UAVBench: An Open Benchmark Dataset for Autonomous and Agentic AI UAV Systems via LLM-Generated Flight Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11252v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 12:51:48 GMT
• Title: UAVBench: An Open Benchmark Dataset for Autonomous and Agentic AI UAV Systems via LLM-Generated Flight Scenarios
• Abstract summary: UAVBench is an open benchmarking benchmark for UAV flight scenarios generated through large language models (LLMs)<n>We present UAVBench_MCQ, a reasoning-oriented extension containing 50,000 multiple-choice questions spanning ten cognitive and ethical reasoning styles.<n>We evaluate 32 state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-5, ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Q3wenwenB, and ERNIE 4.5 300B, and find strong performance in perception and policy reasoning but persistent challenges in ethics-aware and resource-constrained decision-making.
• Score: 3.099103925863002
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous aerial systems increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) for mission planning, perception, and decision-making, yet the lack of standardized and physically grounded benchmarks limits systematic evaluation of their reasoning capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce UAVBench, an open benchmark dataset comprising 50,000 validated UAV flight scenarios generated through taxonomy-guided LLM prompting and multi-stage safety validation. Each scenario is encoded in a structured JSON schema that includes mission objectives, vehicle configuration, environmental conditions, and quantitative risk labels, providing a unified representation of UAV operations across diverse domains. Building on this foundation, we present UAVBench_MCQ, a reasoning-oriented extension containing 50,000 multiple-choice questions spanning ten cognitive and ethical reasoning styles, ranging from aerodynamics and navigation to multi-agent coordination and integrated reasoning. This framework enables interpretable and machine-checkable assessment of UAV-specific cognition under realistic operational contexts. We evaluate 32 state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-5, ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Qwen3 235B, and ERNIE 4.5 300B, and find strong performance in perception and policy reasoning but persistent challenges in ethics-aware and resource-constrained decision-making. UAVBench establishes a reproducible and physically grounded foundation for benchmarking agentic AI in autonomous aerial systems and advancing next-generation UAV reasoning intelligence. To support open science and reproducibility, we release the UAVBench dataset, the UAVBench_MCQ benchmark, evaluation scripts, and all related materials on GitHub at https://github.com/maferrag/UAVBench

Related papers

• AeroGround: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Aerial-Ground Collaborative Reasoning [28.18995637655191]
  We introduce AeroGround, a benchmark for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) in aerial-ground collaborative reasoning.<n>AeroGround is built upon a simulated aerial-ground dataset containing approximately 29,000 multimodal observation groups from diverse open environments.<n>Experiments reveal a substantial gap between current models and human performance: the best model achieves an average accuracy of 54.4%, whereas humans reach 93.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T07:31:15Z)
• Advancing MLLM-based UAV Image Understanding and Reasoning: A Benchmark and a Training-Free Multi-Agent System [21.596261657771]
  UAV-MAS is a training-free multi-agent system for MLLM-based UAV aerial image understanding and reasoning.<n>It achieves 77.0% overall accuracy on UAVQA-Bench, surpassing Gemini 3 Pro by 4.0%, while the 8B variant improves 8.7% over its base model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T07:25:32Z)
• ATBench: A Diverse and Realistic Agent Trajectory Benchmark for Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis [96.92417622318267]
  ATBench is a trajectory-level benchmark for structured, diverse, and realistic evaluation of agent safety.<n>It organizes agentic risk along three dimensions: risk source, failure mode, and real-world harm.<n>It contains 1,000 trajectories (503 safe and 497 unsafe), averaging 9.01 turns and 3.95k tokens, with 1,954 invoked tools drawn from pools spanning 2,084 available tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T13:26:20Z)
• HUGE-Bench: A Benchmark for High-Level UAV Vision-Language-Action Tasks [73.62053624331227]
  Huge-Bench is a benchmark for High-Level UAV Vision-Language-Action tasks.<n>It comprises 4 real-world digital twin scenes, 8 high-level tasks, and 2.56M meters of trajectories.<n>We introduce process-oriented and collision-aware metrics to assess process fidelity, terminal accuracy, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T10:08:42Z)
• From Indoor to Open World: Revealing the Spatial Reasoning Gap in MLLMs [65.04549036809557]
  We introduce a benchmark built from pedestrian-perspective videos captured with synchronized stereo cameras, LiDAR, and IMU/GPS sensors.<n>This dataset provides metrically precise 3D information, enabling the automatic generation of spatial reasoning questions.<n> Evaluations reveal that the performance gains observed in structured indoor benchmarks vanish in open-world settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T18:58:12Z)
• AerialMind: Towards Referring Multi-Object Tracking in UAV Scenarios [64.51320327698231]
  We introduce AerialMind, the first large-scale RMOT benchmark in UAV scenarios.<n>We develop an innovative semi-automated collaborative agent-based labeling assistant framework.<n>We also propose HawkEyeTrack, a novel method that collaboratively enhances vision-language representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T04:44:27Z)
• A Tri-Modal Dataset and a Baseline System for Tracking Unmanned Aerial Vehicles [74.8162337823142]
  MM-UAV is the first large-scale benchmark for Multi-Modal UAV Tracking.<n>The dataset spans over 30 challenging scenarios, with 1,321 synchronised multi-modal sequences, and more than 2.8 million annotated frames.<n>Accompanying the dataset, we provide a novel multi-modal multi-UAV tracking framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T08:42:17Z)
• Is your VLM Sky-Ready? A Comprehensive Spatial Intelligence Benchmark for UAV Navigation [38.19842131198389]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) leveraging their powerful visual perception and reasoning capabilities have been widely applied in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) tasks.<n>However, the spatial intelligence capabilities of existing VLMs in UAV scenarios remain largely unexplored.<n>We introduce SpatialSky-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the spatial intelligence capabilities of VLMs in UAV navigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T11:39:20Z)
• Agentic UAVs: LLM-Driven Autonomy with Integrated Tool-Calling and Cognitive Reasoning [3.4643961367503575]
  Existing UAV frameworks lack context-aware reasoning, autonomous decision-making, and ecosystem-level integration.<n>This paper introduces the Agentic UAVs framework, a five-layer architecture (Perception, Reasoning, Action, Integration, Learning)<n>A ROS2 and Gazebo-based prototype integrates YOLOv11 object detection with GPT-4 reasoning and local Gemma-3 deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-14T08:46:40Z)
• STRIDE-QA: Visual Question Answering Dataset for Spatiotemporal Reasoning in Urban Driving Scenes [5.685235562999083]
  STRIDE-QA is the largest visual question answering dataset fortemporal reasoning in urban driving.<n>It supports both object-centric and ego-centric reasoning through spatial localization and temporal prediction.<n>Our benchmarks demonstrate that existing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) struggle to achieve near-zero scores on prediction consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T07:57:06Z)
• STSBench: A Spatio-temporal Scenario Benchmark for Multi-modal Large Language Models in Autonomous Driving [16.602141801221364]
  STSBench is a framework to benchmark holistic understanding of vision-language models (VLMs) for autonomous driving.<n>The benchmark features 43 diverse scenarios spanning multiple views, resulting in 971 human-verified multiple-choice questions.<n>A thorough evaluation uncovers shortcomings in existing models' ability to reason about fundamental traffic dynamics in complex environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T16:25:22Z)
• ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks [64.86209459039313]
  ThinkGeo is an agentic benchmark designed to evaluate tool-augmented agents on remote sensing tasks via structured tool use and multi-step planning.<n>We implement a ReAct-style interaction loop and evaluate both open and closed-source LLMs on 486 structured agentic tasks with 1,773 expert-verified reasoning steps.<n>Our analysis reveals notable disparities in tool accuracy and planning consistency across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:59:38Z)
• BEDI: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Embodied Agents on UAVs [3.239200269731315]
  Embodied Agents based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have shown significant potential in autonomous tasks.<n>Current evaluation methods for UAV-Embodied Agents (UAV-EAs) remain constrained by the lack of standardized benchmarks.<n>We propose BEDI (Benchmark for Embodied Drone Intelligence), a systematic and standardized benchmark designed for evaluating UAV-EAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T12:14:00Z)
• Are Vision LLMs Road-Ready? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Safety-Critical Driving Video Understanding [10.242043337117005]
  Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in general visual tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering.<n>However, their effectiveness in specialized, safety-critical domains like autonomous driving remains largely unexplored.<n>We introduce DVBench, a pioneering benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of VLLMs in understanding safety-critical driving videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T07:50:44Z)
• EmbodiedEval: Evaluate Multimodal LLMs as Embodied Agents [57.4686961979566]
  EmbodiedEval is a comprehensive and interactive evaluation benchmark for MLLMs with embodied tasks.<n>It covers a broad spectrum of existing embodied AI tasks with significantly enhanced diversity.<n>We evaluated the state-of-the-art MLLMs on EmbodiedEval and found that they have a significant shortfall compared to human level on embodied tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T03:22:10Z)
• MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains [54.117238759317004]
  Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark features comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T00:58:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.