Beyond Task Completion: An Assessment Framework for Evaluating Agentic AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12791v2
• Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 08:07:38 GMT
• Title: Beyond Task Completion: An Assessment Framework for Evaluating Agentic AI Systems
• Authors: Sreemaee Akshathala, Bassam Adnan, Mahisha Ramesh, Karthik Vaidhyanathan, Basil Muhammed, Kannan Parthasarathy,
• Abstract summary: Recent advances in agentic AI have shifted the focus from standalone Large Language Models to integrated systems.<n>We propose an end-to-end Agent Assessment Framework with four evaluation pillars encompassing LLMs, Memory, Tools, and Environment.<n>We validate the framework on a representative Autonomous CloudOps use case, where experiments reveal behavioral deviations by conventional metrics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in agentic AI have shifted the focus from standalone Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrated systems that combine LLMs with tools, memory, and other agents to perform complex tasks. These multi-agent architectures enable coordinated reasoning, planning, and execution across diverse domains, allowing agents to collaboratively automate complex workflows. Despite these advances, evaluation and assessment of LLM agents and the multi-agent systems they constitute remain a fundamental challenge. Although various approaches have been proposed in the software engineering literature for evaluating conventional software components, existing methods for AI-based systems often overlook the non-deterministic nature of models. This non-determinism introduces behavioral uncertainty during execution, yet existing evaluations rely on binary task completion metrics that fail to capture it. Evaluating agentic systems therefore requires examining additional dimensions, including the agent ability to invoke tools, ingest and retrieve memory, collaborate with other agents, and interact effectively with its environment. These challenges emerged during our ongoing industry collaboration with MontyCloud Inc., when we deployed an agentic system in production. These limitations surfaced during deployment, highlighting practical gaps in the current evaluation methods and the need for a systematic assessment of agent behavior beyond task outcomes. Informed by these observations and established definitions of agentic systems, we propose an end-to-end Agent Assessment Framework with four evaluation pillars encompassing LLMs, Memory, Tools, and Environment. We validate the framework on a representative Autonomous CloudOps use case, where experiments reveal behavioral deviations overlooked by conventional metrics, demonstrating its effectiveness in capturing runtime uncertainties.

Related papers

• AEMA: Verifiable Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy and Controlled Agentic LLM Systems [0.28055179094637683]
  AEMA plans, executes, and aggregates multistep evaluations across heterogeneous agentic under human oversight.<n>Compared to a single LLM-as-a-Judge, AEMA achieves greater stability, human alignment, and traceable records that support accountable automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T04:09:02Z)
• SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
  SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z)
• LoCoBench-Agent: An Interactive Benchmark for LLM Agents in Long-Context Software Engineering [90.84806758077536]
  We introduce textbfLoCoBench-Agent, a comprehensive evaluation framework specifically designed to assess large language models (LLMs) agents in realistic, long-context software engineering.<n>Our framework extends LoCoBench's 8,000 scenarios into interactive agent environments, enabling systematic evaluation of multi-turn conversations.<n>Our framework provides agents with 8 specialized tools (file operations, search, code analysis) and evaluates them across context lengths ranging from 10K to 1M tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T23:57:24Z)
• A Survey on Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models [84.18778056010629]
  We present a comprehensive survey on Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models (Agentic MLLMs)<n>We explore the emerging paradigm of agentic MLLMs, delineating their conceptual foundations and distinguishing characteristics from conventional MLLM-based agents.<n>To further accelerate research in this area for the community, we compile open-source training frameworks, training and evaluation datasets for developing agentic MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T04:07:01Z)
• Agentic Systems in Radiology: Design, Applications, Evaluation, and Challenges [13.53016942028838]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of using natural language to integrate information, follow instructions, and perform forms of "reasoning" and planning.<n>With its multimodal data streams and orchestrated spanning multiple systems, radiology is uniquely suited to benefit from agents that can adapt to context and automate repetitive yet complex tasks.<n>This review examines the design of such LLM agentic systems, highlights key applications, discusses evaluation methods for planning and tool use, and outlines challenges such as error cascades, tool-use efficiency, and health IT integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T13:56:27Z)
• Fundamentals of Building Autonomous LLM Agents [64.39018305018904]
  This paper reviews the architecture and implementation methods of agents powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>The research aims to explore patterns to develop "agentic" LLMs that can automate complex tasks and bridge the performance gap with human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T10:32:39Z)
• AgentCompass: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Agentic Workflows in Production [4.031479494871582]
  We present Agent, the first evaluation framework designed specifically for post-deployment monitoring and reasoning of agentic pipeline.<n>Agent achieves state-of-the-art results on key metrics, while uncovering critical issues missed in human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T05:59:04Z)
• AI Agentic Programming: A Survey of Techniques, Challenges, and Opportunities [8.086360127362815]
  Large language model (LLM)-based coding agents autonomously plan, execute, and interact with tools such as compilers, debuggers, and version control systems.<n>Unlike conventional code generation, these agents decompose goals, coordinate multi-step processes, and adapt based on feedback, reshaping software development practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T00:14:31Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
  Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z)
• PIPA: A Unified Evaluation Protocol for Diagnosing Interactive Planning Agents [12.052972947563424]
  Existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate agent performance based on task completion as a proxy for overall effectiveness.<n>We propose PIPA, a unified evaluation protocol that conceptualizes the behavioral process of interactive task planning agents.<n>Our analyses show that agents excel in different behavioral stages, with user satisfaction shaped by both outcomes and intermediate behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T21:27:10Z)
• AIOpsLab: A Holistic Framework to Evaluate AI Agents for Enabling Autonomous Clouds [12.464941027105306]
  AI for IT Operations (AIOps) aims to automate complex operational tasks, such as fault localization and root cause analysis, to reduce human workload and minimize customer impact.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents are revolutionizing AIOps by enabling end-to-end and multitask automation.<n>We present AIOPSLAB, a framework that deploys microservice cloud environments, injects faults, generates workloads, and exports telemetry data but also orchestrates these components and provides interfaces for interacting with and evaluating agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T04:17:39Z)
• Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents [61.33974108405561]
  We introduce the Agent-as-a-Judge framework, wherein agentic systems are used to evaluate agentic systems. This is an organic extension of the LLM-as-a-Judge framework, incorporating agentic features that enable intermediate feedback for the entire task-solving process. We present DevAI, a new benchmark of 55 realistic automated AI development tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:57:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.