MOSLIM:Align with diverse preferences in prompts through reward classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20336v1
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 12:22:21 GMT
• Title: MOSLIM:Align with diverse preferences in prompts through reward classification
• Authors: Yu Zhang, Wanli Jiang, Zhengyu Yang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel multi-objective alignment method, MOSLIM, which utilizes a single reward model and policy model to address diverse objectives.<n> MOSLIM provides a flexible way to control these objectives through prompting and does not require preference training during SFT phase.<n>We demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method across several multi-objective benchmarks and conduct ablation studies on various reward model sizes and policy optimization methods.
• Score: 6.6431471703308915
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The multi-objective alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for ensuring foundational models conform to diverse human preferences. Current research in this field typically involves either multiple policies or multiple reward models customized for various preferences, or the need to train a preference-specific supervised fine-tuning (SFT) model. In this work, we introduce a novel multi-objective alignment method, MOSLIM, which utilizes a single reward model and policy model to address diverse objectives. MOSLIM provides a flexible way to control these objectives through prompting and does not require preference training during SFT phase, allowing thousands of off-the-shelf models to be directly utilized within this training framework. MOSLIM leverages a multi-head reward model that classifies question-answer pairs instead of scoring them and then optimize policy model with a scalar reward derived from a mapping function that converts classification results from reward model into reward scores. We demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method across several multi-objective benchmarks and conduct ablation studies on various reward model sizes and policy optimization methods. The MOSLIM method outperforms current multi-objective approaches in most results while requiring significantly fewer GPU computing resources compared with existing policy optimization methods.

Related papers

• Preference-based Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning [5.031225669460861]
  This paper introduces preference-based MORL (Pb-MORL), which formalizes the integration of preferences into the MORL framework.<n>To guide policy optimization using preferences, our method constructs a multi-objective reward model that aligns with the given preferences.<n>Experiments in benchmark multi-objective tasks, a multi-energy management task, and an autonomous driving task on a multi-line highway show that our method performs competitively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T16:43:04Z)
• Activation Reward Models for Few-Shot Model Alignment [77.37511364793515]
  We introduce Activation Reward Models (Activation RMs)<n>Activation RMs leverage activation steering to construct well-aligned reward signals using minimal supervision and no additional model finetuning.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of Activation RMs in mitigating reward hacking behaviors, highlighting their utility for safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T05:10:29Z)
• AMoPO: Adaptive Multi-objective Preference Optimization without Reward Models and Reference Models [18.249363312256722]
  AMoPO is a novel framework that achieves dynamic balance across preference dimensions.<n>We introduce the multi-objective optimization paradigm to use the dimension-aware generation metrics as implicit rewards.<n> Empirical results demonstrate that AMoPO outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 28.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T14:31:06Z)
• Unifying Multimodal Large Language Model Capabilities and Modalities via Model Merging [103.98582374569789]
  Model merging aims to combine multiple expert models into a single model, thereby reducing storage and serving costs.<n>Previous studies have primarily focused on merging visual classification models or Large Language Models (LLMs) for code and math tasks.<n>We introduce the model merging benchmark for MLLMs, which includes multiple tasks such as VQA, Geometry, Chart, OCR, and Grounding, providing both LoRA and full fine-tuning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:23:14Z)
• Decision Flow Policy Optimization [53.825268058199825]
  We show that generative models can effectively model complex multi-modal action distributions and achieve superior robotic control in continuous action spaces.<n>Previous methods usually adopt the generative models as behavior models to fit state-conditioned action distributions from datasets.<n>We propose Decision Flow, a unified framework that integrates multi-modal action distribution modeling and policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T03:42:20Z)
• Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPO [6.434799451791957]
  Multi-objective preference alignment is critical for developing AI systems that are personalizable, helpful, and safe.<n>Existing approaches are either computationally expensive to train or do not sufficiently steer model behaviors.<n>This paper introduces the Multi-Objective Online DPO algorithm, designed to robustly and efficiently align model behaviors with multiple, potentially conflicting human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T02:01:49Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications.<n> Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge.<n>We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• Diversified Batch Selection for Training Acceleration [68.67164304377732]
  A prevalent research line, known as online batch selection, explores selecting informative subsets during the training process. vanilla reference-model-free methods involve independently scoring and selecting data in a sample-wise manner. We propose Diversified Batch Selection (DivBS), which is reference-model-free and can efficiently select diverse and representative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T12:12:20Z)
• Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment [46.44464839353993]
  We introduce Rewards-in-Context (RiC), which conditions the response of a foundation model on multiple rewards in its prompt context. RiC only requires supervised fine-tuning of a single foundation model and supports dynamic adjustment for user preferences during inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T18:58:31Z)
• Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization [76.09576643028362]
  We present Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization (MODPO) for multiple alignment objectives. MODPO folds language modeling directly into reward modeling, training language models as implicit collective reward models. It theoretically yields the same optimal solutions as MORLHF but is practically more stable and efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T17:35:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.