Racism, Resistance, and Reddit: How Popular Culture Sparks Online Reckonings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21016v1
• Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 10:49:17 GMT
• Title: Racism, Resistance, and Reddit: How Popular Culture Sparks Online Reckonings
• Authors: Sherry Mason, Tawfiq Ammari,
• Abstract summary: This study examines how Reddit users engaged with the racial narratives of Lovecraft Country and Watchmen.<n>We identify three dynamic social roles advocates, adversaries, and adaptives.<n>Findings reveal how Reddits pseudonymous affordances shape role fluidity, opinion leadership, and moral engagement.
• Score: 1.9567015559455132
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study examines how Reddit users engaged with the racial narratives of Lovecraft Country and Watchmen, two television series that reimagine historical racial trauma. Drawing on narrative persuasion and multistep flow theory, we analyze 3,879 Reddit comments using topic modeling and critical discourse analysis. We identify three dynamic social roles advocates, adversaries, and adaptives and explore how users move between them in response to racial discourse. Findings reveal how Reddits pseudonymous affordances shape role fluidity, opinion leadership, and moral engagement. While adversaries minimized or rejected racism as exaggerated, advocates shared standpoint experiences and historical resources to challenge these claims. Adaptive users shifted perspectives over time, demonstrating how online publics can foster critical racial learning. This research highlights how popular culture and participatory platforms intersect in shaping collective meaning making around race and historical memory.

Related papers

• Cultural Awareness in Vision-Language Models: A Cross-Country Exploration [5.921976812527759]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in diverse cultural contexts.<n>We propose a novel framework to evaluate how VLMs encode cultural differences and biases related to race, gender, and physical traits across countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T18:47:52Z)
• Examining Racial Stereotypes in YouTube Autocomplete Suggestions [1.297210402524609]
  We examine what YouTube autocompletes suggest to users seeking information about race on the platform.<n>Using critical discourse analysis, we identify five major sociocultural contexts in which racial information appears.<n>We call for innovations in content moderation policy design and enforcement to address existing racial harms in YouTube search outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T02:53:25Z)
• The Factuality Tax of Diversity-Intervened Text-to-Image Generation: Benchmark and Fact-Augmented Intervention [61.80236015147771]
  We quantify the trade-off between using diversity interventions and preserving demographic factuality in T2I models. Experiments on DoFaiR reveal that diversity-oriented instructions increase the number of different gender and racial groups. We propose Fact-Augmented Intervention (FAI) to reflect on verbalized or retrieved factual information about gender and racial compositions of generation subjects in history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T09:09:42Z)
• Machines Do See Color: A Guideline to Classify Different Forms of Racist Discourse in Large Corpora [0.0]
  Current methods to identify and classify racist language in text rely on small-n qualitative approaches or large-n approaches focusing exclusively on overt forms of racist discourse. This article provides a step-by-step generalizable guideline to identify and classify different forms of racist discourse in large corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T16:57:18Z)
• Disinformation Echo-Chambers on Facebook [0.27195102129095]
  This chapter introduces a computational method designed to identify coordinated inauthentic behavior within Facebook groups. The method focuses on analyzing posts, URLs, and images, revealing that certain Facebook groups engage in orchestrated campaigns. These groups simultaneously share identical content, which may expose users to repeated encounters with false or misleading narratives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T14:33:16Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries. We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News Discussion on Reddit [9.875731068651561]
  We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context. We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T11:37:12Z)
• Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
  We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity. The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z)
• Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
  We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations. We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity. Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z)
• Whose Opinions Matter? Perspective-aware Models to Identify Opinions of Hate Speech Victims in Abusive Language Detection [6.167830237917662]
  We present an in-depth study to model polarized opinions coming from different communities. We believe that by relying on this information, we can divide the annotators into groups sharing similar perspectives. We propose a novel resource, a multi-perspective English language dataset annotated according to different sub-categories relevant for characterising online abuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T08:35:49Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis [51.39895377836919]
  COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T21:58:09Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.