Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News
Discussion on Reddit
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07598v2
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 10:37:53 GMT
- Title: Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News
Discussion on Reddit
- Authors: Corrado Monti, Jacopo D'Ignazi, Michele Starnini, Gianmarco De
Francisci Morales
- Abstract summary: We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context.
We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit.
- Score: 9.875731068651561
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic
groups in a typical opinion formation context: online discussions of current
news. We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on
Reddit, one of the most visited websites in the United States. Then, we
estimate demographic and ideological attributes of these users. Thanks to a
comparison with a carefully-crafted network null model, we establish which
pairs of attributes foster interactions and which ones inhibit them.
Individuals prefer to engage with the opposite ideological side, which
contradicts the echo chamber narrative. Instead, demographic groups are
homophilic, as individuals tend to interact within their own group - even in an
online setting where such attributes are not directly observable. In
particular, we observe age and income segregation consistently across years:
users tend to avoid interactions when belonging to different groups. These
results persist after controlling for the degree of interest by each
demographic group in different news topics. Our findings align with the theory
that affective polarization - the difficulty in socializing across political
boundaries-is more connected with an increasingly divided society, rather than
ideological echo chambers on social media.
We publicly release our anonymized data set and all the code to reproduce our
results: https://github.com/corradomonti/demographic-homophily
Related papers
- Navigating Multidimensional Ideologies with Reddit's Political Compass:
Economic Conflict and Social Affinity [3.850666668546735]
We analyze social interactions on Reddit under the lens of a multi-dimensional ideological framework: the political compass.
By leveraging their self-declarations, we disentangle the ideological dimensions of users into economic (left-right) and social (libertarian richness-authoritarian) axes.
We find significant homophily for interactions along the social axis of the political compass and demographic attributes.
In contrast, we uncover a significant heterophily along the economic axis: left/right interactions exceed expectations by 10%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T18:49:19Z) - Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users [0.0]
We show that the evolution of online platform-wide opinion groups is driven by the desire to hold popular opinions.
We focus on two social media: Twitter and Parler, on which we tracked the political biases of their users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-27T19:39:07Z) - Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect? [88.35520051971538]
We investigate the opinions reflected by language models (LMs) by leveraging high-quality public opinion polls and their associated human responses.
We find substantial misalignment between the views reflected by current LMs and those of US demographic groups.
Our analysis confirms prior observations about the left-leaning tendencies of some human feedback-tuned LMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-30T17:17:08Z) - Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers
and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years.
We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z) - Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics
on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity.
The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Exploring Polarization of Users Behavior on Twitter During the 2019
South American Protests [15.065938163384235]
We explore polarization on Twitter in a different context, namely the protest that paralyzed several countries in the South American region in 2019.
By leveraging users' endorsement of politicians' tweets and hashtag campaigns with defined stances towards the protest (for or against), we construct a weakly labeled stance dataset with millions of users.
We find empirical evidence of the "filter bubble" phenomenon during the event, as we not only show that the user bases are homogeneous in terms of stance, but the probability that a user transitions from media of different clusters is low.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-05T07:13:18Z) - Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment:
the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic.
We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content.
Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.