Lazarus Group Targets Crypto-Wallets and Financial Data while employing new Tradecrafts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21725v2
• Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 19:42:53 GMT
• Title: Lazarus Group Targets Crypto-Wallets and Financial Data while employing new Tradecrafts
• Authors: Alessio Di Santo,
• Abstract summary: This report presents a comprehensive analysis of a malicious software sample, detailing its architecture, behavioral characteristics, and underlying intent.<n>The malware core functionalities, including persistence mechanisms, command-and-control communication, and data exfiltration routines, are identified.<n>This malware analysis report not only reconstructs past adversary actions but also establishes a robust foundation for anticipating and mitigating future attacks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This report presents a comprehensive analysis of a malicious software sample, detailing its architecture, behavioral characteristics, and underlying intent. Through static and dynamic examination, the malware core functionalities, including persistence mechanisms, command-and-control communication, and data exfiltration routines, are identified and its supporting infrastructure is mapped. By correlating observed indicators of compromise with known techniques, tactics, and procedures, this analysis situates the sample within the broader context of contemporary threat campaigns and infers the capabilities and motivations of its likely threat actor. Building on these findings, actionable threat intelligence is provided to support proactive defenses. Threat hunting teams receive precise detection hypotheses for uncovering latent adversarial presence, while monitoring systems can refine alert logic to detect anomalous activity in real time. Finally, the report discusses how this structured intelligence enhances predictive risk assessments, informs vulnerability prioritization, and strengthens organizational resilience against advanced persistent threats. By integrating detailed technical insights with strategic threat landscape mapping, this malware analysis report not only reconstructs past adversary actions but also establishes a robust foundation for anticipating and mitigating future attacks.

Related papers

• Beyond Vulnerabilities: A Survey of Adversarial Attacks as Both Threats and Defenses in Computer Vision Systems [5.787505062263962]
  Adversarial attacks against computer vision systems have emerged as a critical research area that challenges the fundamental assumptions about neural network robustness and security.<n>This comprehensive survey examines the evolving landscape of adversarial techniques, revealing their dual nature as both sophisticated security threats and valuable defensive tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T17:02:05Z)
• Preliminary Investigation into Uncertainty-Aware Attack Stage Classification [81.28215542218724]
  This work addresses the problem of attack stage inference under uncertainty.<n>We propose a classification approach based on Evidential Deep Learning (EDL), which models predictive uncertainty by outputting parameters of a Dirichlet distribution over possible stages.<n>Preliminary experiments in a simulated environment demonstrate that the proposed model can accurately infer the stage of an attack with confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T06:58:00Z)
• CLIProv: A Contrastive Log-to-Intelligence Multimodal Approach for Threat Detection and Provenance Analysis [6.680853786327484]
  This paper introduces CLIProv, a novel approach for detecting threat behaviors in a host system.<n>By leveraging attack pattern information in threat intelligence, CLIProv identifies TTPs and generates complete and concise attack scenarios.<n>Compared to state-of-the-art methods, CLIProv achieves higher precision and significantly improved detection efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T04:20:00Z)
• A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models [55.60375624503877]
  Model extraction attacks pose significant security threats to deployed language models.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive taxonomy of extraction attacks and defenses, categorizing attacks into functionality extraction, training data extraction, and prompt-targeted attacks.<n>We examine defense mechanisms organized into model protection, data privacy protection, and prompt-targeted strategies, evaluating their effectiveness across different deployment scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T22:02:01Z)
• Real-Time Detection of Insider Threats Using Behavioral Analytics and Deep Evidential Clustering [0.0]
  We propose a novel framework for real-time detection of insider threats using behavioral analytics combined with deep evidential clustering.<n>Our system captures and analyzes user activities, applies context-rich behavioral features, and classifies potential threats.<n>We evaluate our framework on benchmark insider threat datasets such as CERT and TWOS, achieving an average detection accuracy of 94.7% and a 38% reduction in false positives compared to traditional clustering methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T11:21:33Z)
• Autonomous Identity-Based Threat Segmentation in Zero Trust Architectures [4.169915659794567]
  Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) fundamentally redefine network security by adopting a "trust nothing, verify everything" approach.<n>This research applies the proposed AI-driven, autonomous, identity-based threat segmentation in ZTA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T15:35:02Z)
• A Survey and Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks for Object Detection [11.48212060875543]
  Deep learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples that can deceive them into making confident but incorrect predictions.<n>This vulnerability pose significant risks in high-stakes applications such as autonomous vehicles, security surveillance, and safety-critical inspection systems.<n>This paper presents a novel taxonomic framework for categorizing adversarial attacks specific to object detection architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-04T05:22:08Z)
• The Adversarial Implications of Variable-Time Inference [47.44631666803983]
  We present an approach that exploits a novel side channel in which the adversary simply measures the execution time of the algorithm used to post-process the predictions of the ML model under attack. We investigate leakage from the non-maximum suppression (NMS) algorithm, which plays a crucial role in the operation of object detectors. We demonstrate attacks against the YOLOv3 detector, leveraging the timing leakage to successfully evade object detection using adversarial examples, and perform dataset inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T11:53:17Z)
• On the Security Risks of Knowledge Graph Reasoning [71.64027889145261]
  We systematize the security threats to KGR according to the adversary's objectives, knowledge, and attack vectors. We present ROAR, a new class of attacks that instantiate a variety of such threats. We explore potential countermeasures against ROAR, including filtering of potentially poisoning knowledge and training with adversarially augmented queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T18:47:42Z)
• Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Machine Learning-Powered Networks: A Contemporary Survey [114.17568992164303]
  Adrial attacks and defenses in machine learning and deep neural network have been gaining significant attention. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in the field of adversarial attack and defense techniques. New avenues of attack are also explored, including search-based, decision-based, drop-based, and physical-world attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-11T04:19:31Z)
• Untargeted Backdoor Attack against Object Detection [69.63097724439886]
  We design a poison-only backdoor attack in an untargeted manner, based on task characteristics. We show that, once the backdoor is embedded into the target model by our attack, it can trick the model to lose detection of any object stamped with our trigger patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T17:05:45Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.