EnsemW2S: Enhancing Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Large Language Model Ensembles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21959v2
• Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:02:02 GMT
• Title: EnsemW2S: Enhancing Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Large Language Model Ensembles
• Authors: Aakriti Agrawal, Mucong Ding, Zora Che, Chenghao Deng, Anirudh Satheesh, Bang An, Bayan Bruss, John Langford, Furong Huang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel method aimed at improving weak experts, by training on the same limited human-level data, enabling them to generalize to complex, super-human-level tasks.<n>Our approach, called textbfEnsemW2S, employs a token-level ensemble strategy that iteratively combines multiple weak experts.<n>We extensively evaluate the generalization performance of both the ensemble of weak experts and the subsequent strong student model across in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets.
• Score: 32.189105375228294
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With Large Language Models (LLMs) rapidly approaching and potentially surpassing human-level performance, it has become imperative to develop approaches capable of effectively supervising and enhancing these powerful models using smaller, human-level models exposed to only human-level data. We address this critical weak-to-strong (W2S) generalization challenge by proposing a novel method aimed at improving weak experts, by training on the same limited human-level data, enabling them to generalize to complex, super-human-level tasks. Our approach, called \textbf{EnsemW2S}, employs a token-level ensemble strategy that iteratively combines multiple weak experts, systematically addressing the shortcomings identified in preceding iterations. By continuously refining these weak models, we significantly enhance their collective ability to supervise stronger student models. We extensively evaluate the generalization performance of both the ensemble of weak experts and the subsequent strong student model across in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets. For OOD, we specifically introduce question difficulty as an additional dimension for defining distributional shifts. Our empirical results demonstrate notable improvements, achieving 4\%, and 3.2\% improvements on ID datasets and, upto 6\% and 2.28\% on OOD datasets for experts and student models respectively, underscoring the effectiveness of our proposed method in advancing W2S generalization.

Related papers

• Bagging-Based Model Merging for Robust General Text Embeddings [73.51674133699196]
  General-purpose text embedding models underpin a wide range of NLP and information retrieval applications.<n>We present a systematic study of multi-task training for text embeddings from two perspectives: data scheduling and model merging.<n>We propose Bagging-based rObust mOdel Merging (BOOM), which trains multiple embedding models on sampled subsets and merges them into a single model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T15:45:08Z)
• Exploring Weak-to-Strong Generalization for CLIP-based Classification [22.367331851262875]
  Current methods rely on human supervision but become impractical as model complexity increases.<n>A novel solution proposed recently is using a weaker model to supervise a stronger model.<n>Previous work has shown the effectiveness of weak-to-strong generalization in the context of language-only models.<n>We propose a method, class prototype learning (CPL), which aims to enhance the classification capabilities of the CLIP model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T10:47:25Z)
• Weak-to-Strong Generalization under Distribution Shifts [6.711930932187631]
  We propose RAVEN, a robust weak-to-strong generalization framework.<n>RAVEN learns the optimal combinations of weak models in addition to parameters of the strong model.<n>Our results show that RAVEN assigns higher weights to more accurate weak models, demonstrating its ability to automatically identify trustworthy supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T10:46:50Z)
• The Path of Self-Evolving Large Language Models: Achieving Data-Efficient Learning via Intrinsic Feedback [51.144727949988436]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated potential to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>In this work, we explore improving LLMs through RL with minimal data.<n>To minimize data dependency, we introduce two novel mechanisms grounded in self-awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T06:32:10Z)
• Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Failure Trajectories: A Tree-based Approach to Elicit Optimal Policy in Strong Models [26.393123295267642]
  Weak-to-Strong generalization (W2SG) is a new trend to elicit the full capabilities of a strong model with supervision from a weak model.<n>We fine-tune a strong model with trajectories of intermediate actions generated by a weak model.<n>Our empirical evaluations demonstrate substantial improvements in reasoning and decision-making capabilities across diverse task domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T00:17:09Z)
• Towards Generalized Video Quality Assessment: A Weak-to-Strong Learning Paradigm [76.63001244080313]
  Video quality assessment (VQA) seeks to predict the perceptual quality of a video in alignment with human visual perception.<n>The dominant VQA paradigm relies on supervised training with human-labeled datasets.<n>We explore weak-to-strong (W2S) learning as a new paradigm for advancing VQA without reliance on large-scale human-labeled datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T15:29:32Z)
• Towards Robust Universal Information Extraction: Benchmark, Evaluation, and Solution [66.11004226578771]
  Existing robust benchmark datasets have two key limitations.<n>They generate only a limited range of perturbations for a single Information Extraction (IE) task.<n>Considering the powerful generation capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we introduce a new benchmark dataset for Robust UIE, called RUIE-Bench.<n>We show that training with only textbf15% of the data leads to an average textbf7.5% relative performance improvement across three IE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:39:29Z)
• An Active Learning Framework for Inclusive Generation by Large Language Models [32.16984263644299]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) generate text representative of diverse sub-populations.<n>We propose a novel clustering-based active learning framework, enhanced with knowledge distillation.<n>We construct two new datasets in tandem with model training, showing a performance improvement of 2%-10% over baseline models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T15:09:35Z)
• EnsemW2S: Can an Ensemble of LLMs be Leveraged to Obtain a Stronger LLM? [28.43206274079919]
  We propose an innovative approach to weak-to-strong (w2s) generalization. We show that weak models trained on simpler tasks collaboratively supervise stronger models on more complex tasks. We observe an improvement of up to 14% over existing baselines and average improvements of 5% and 4% for binary classification and generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:06:42Z)
• Semi-Supervised Reward Modeling via Iterative Self-Training [52.48668920483908]
  We propose Semi-Supervised Reward Modeling (SSRM), an approach that enhances RM training using unlabeled data. We demonstrate that SSRM significantly improves reward models without incurring additional labeling costs. Overall, SSRM substantially reduces the dependency on large volumes of human-annotated data, thereby decreasing the overall cost and time involved in training effective reward models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T22:57:58Z)
• Weak-to-Strong Reasoning [33.20094938292376]
  We introduce a progressive learning framework that enables the strong model to autonomously refine its training data. Our method significantly enhances the reasoning capabilities of Llama2-70b using three separate weak models. This work paves the way for a more scalable and sophisticated strategy to enhance AI reasoning powers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T16:25:17Z)
• Vision Superalignment: Weak-to-Strong Generalization for Vision Foundation Models [55.919653720979824]
  This paper focuses on the concept of weak-to-strong generalization, which involves using a weaker model to supervise a stronger one. We introduce a novel and adaptively adjustable loss function for weak-to-strong supervision. Our approach not only exceeds the performance benchmarks set by strong-to-strong generalization but also surpasses the outcomes of fine-tuning strong models with whole datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T06:30:34Z)
• Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling [134.97964938009588]
  We introduce a series of novel methods to mitigate the influence of incorrect and ambiguous preferences in the dataset. We also introduce contrastive learning to enhance the ability of reward models to distinguish between chosen and rejected responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T17:56:59Z)
• Improving Generalization of Alignment with Human Preferences through Group Invariant Learning [56.19242260613749]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) enables the generation of responses more aligned with human preferences. Previous work shows that Reinforcement Learning (RL) often exploits shortcuts to attain high rewards and overlooks challenging samples. We propose a novel approach that can learn a consistent policy via RL across various data groups or domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T13:54:15Z)
• TWINS: A Fine-Tuning Framework for Improved Transferability of Adversarial Robustness and Generalization [89.54947228958494]
  This paper focuses on the fine-tuning of an adversarially pre-trained model in various classification tasks. We propose a novel statistics-based approach, Two-WIng NormliSation (TWINS) fine-tuning framework. TWINS is shown to be effective on a wide range of image classification datasets in terms of both generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:12:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.