EnsemW2S: Can an Ensemble of LLMs be Leveraged to Obtain a Stronger LLM?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04571v1
• Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 18:06:42 GMT
• Title: EnsemW2S: Can an Ensemble of LLMs be Leveraged to Obtain a Stronger LLM?
• Authors: Aakriti Agrawal, Mucong Ding, Zora Che, Chenghao Deng, Anirudh Satheesh, John Langford, Furong Huang,
• Abstract summary: We propose an innovative approach to weak-to-strong (w2s) generalization. We show that weak models trained on simpler tasks collaboratively supervise stronger models on more complex tasks. We observe an improvement of up to 14% over existing baselines and average improvements of 5% and 4% for binary classification and generative tasks.
• Score: 28.43206274079919
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: How can we harness the collective capabilities of multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) to create an even more powerful model? This question forms the foundation of our research, where we propose an innovative approach to weak-to-strong (w2s) generalization-a critical problem in AI alignment. Our work introduces an easy-to-hard (e2h) framework for studying the feasibility of w2s generalization, where weak models trained on simpler tasks collaboratively supervise stronger models on more complex tasks. This setup mirrors real-world challenges, where direct human supervision is limited. To achieve this, we develop a novel AdaBoost-inspired ensemble method, demonstrating that an ensemble of weak supervisors can enhance the performance of stronger LLMs across classification and generative tasks on difficult QA datasets. In several cases, our ensemble approach matches the performance of models trained on ground-truth data, establishing a new benchmark for w2s generalization. We observe an improvement of up to 14% over existing baselines and average improvements of 5% and 4% for binary classification and generative tasks, respectively. This research points to a promising direction for enhancing AI through collective supervision, especially in scenarios where labeled data is sparse or insufficient.

Related papers

• MoRE: Unlocking Scalability in Reinforcement Learning for Quadruped Vision-Language-Action Models [34.138699712315]
  This paper introduces a novel vision--action (VLA) model, mixture of robotic experts (MoRE) for quadruped robots. MoRE integrates multiple low-rank adaptation modules as distinct experts within a dense multi-modal large language model. Experiments demonstrate that MoRE outperforms all baselines across six different skills and exhibits superior generalization capabilities in out-of-distribution scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T03:13:45Z)
• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks. However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback. We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search [57.28671084993782]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse domains. Recent studies have shown that increasing test-time computation enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities. We propose a two-stage training paradigm: 1) a small-scale format tuning stage to internalize the COAT reasoning format and 2) a large-scale self-improvement stage leveraging reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T17:26:58Z)
• Unconstrained Model Merging for Enhanced LLM Reasoning [42.079040543428036]
  We explore the potential of merging multiple expert models into a single large language model. We propose an unconstrained model merging framework that accommodates both homogeneous and heterogeneous model architectures. Across 7 benchmarks and 9 reasoning-optimized LLMs, we reveal key findings that reasoning emerges from merging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T16:04:07Z)
• NVLM: Open Frontier-Class Multimodal LLMs [64.00053046838225]
  We introduce NVLM 1.0, a family of frontier-class multimodal large language models (LLMs) that achieve state-of-the-art results on vision-language tasks. We propose a novel architecture that enhances both training efficiency and multimodal reasoning capabilities. We develop production-grade multimodality for the NVLM-1.0 models, enabling them to excel in vision-language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T17:59:06Z)
• Weak-to-Strong Reasoning [33.20094938292376]
  We introduce a progressive learning framework that enables the strong model to autonomously refine its training data. Our method significantly enhances the reasoning capabilities of Llama2-70b using three separate weak models. This work paves the way for a more scalable and sophisticated strategy to enhance AI reasoning powers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T16:25:17Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• A General Framework for Learning from Weak Supervision [93.89870459388185]
  This paper introduces a general framework for learning from weak supervision (GLWS) with a novel algorithm. Central to GLWS is an Expectation-Maximization (EM) formulation, adeptly accommodating various weak supervision sources. We also present an advanced algorithm that significantly simplifies the EM computational demands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T21:48:50Z)
• Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Scalable Oversight and Ensemble Learning [21.401598876308345]
  This paper presents a follow-up study to OpenAI's recent superalignment work on Weak-to-Strong Generalization (W2SG) Superalignment focuses on ensuring that high-level AI systems remain consistent with human values and intentions when dealing with complex, high-risk tasks. Our study simulates two phases of superalignment under the W2SG framework: the development of general superhuman models and the progression towards superintelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T15:30:19Z)
• Improving Generalization of Alignment with Human Preferences through Group Invariant Learning [56.19242260613749]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) enables the generation of responses more aligned with human preferences. Previous work shows that Reinforcement Learning (RL) often exploits shortcuts to attain high rewards and overlooks challenging samples. We propose a novel approach that can learn a consistent policy via RL across various data groups or domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T13:54:15Z)
• SALMON: Self-Alignment with Instructable Reward Models [80.83323636730341]
  This paper presents a novel approach, namely SALMON, to align base language models with minimal human supervision. We develop an AI assistant named Dromedary-2 with only 6 exemplars for in-context learning and 31 human-defined principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T17:56:53Z)
• Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
  Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.