Natural Language Processing in Support of Evidence-based Medicine: A Scoping Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22280v1
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:17:01 GMT
• Title: Natural Language Processing in Support of Evidence-based Medicine: A Scoping Review
• Abstract summary: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is at the forefront of modern healthcare, emphasizing the use of the best available scientific evidence to guide clinical decisions.<n>There is a critical need to investigate Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods to identify, appraise, synthesize, summarize, and disseminate evidence in EBM.<n>This survey presents an in-depth review of 129 research studies on leveraging NLP for EBM, illustrating its pivotal role in enhancing clinical decision-making processes.
• Score: 20.806546651936408
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is at the forefront of modern healthcare, emphasizing the use of the best available scientific evidence to guide clinical decisions. Due to the sheer volume and rapid growth of medical literature and the high cost of curation, there is a critical need to investigate Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods to identify, appraise, synthesize, summarize, and disseminate evidence in EBM. This survey presents an in-depth review of 129 research studies on leveraging NLP for EBM, illustrating its pivotal role in enhancing clinical decision-making processes. The paper systematically explores how NLP supports the five fundamental steps of EBM -- Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Apply, and Assess. The review not only identifies current limitations within the field but also proposes directions for future research, emphasizing the potential for NLP to revolutionize EBM by refining evidence extraction, evidence synthesis, appraisal, summarization, enhancing data comprehensibility, and facilitating a more efficient clinical workflow.

Related papers

• EHRBench: An Automated and Reliable EHR-based Benchmark for Clinical Decision Making with LLMs [51.129595320595094]
  Clinical decision-making (CDM) is central to real-world clinical, where clinicians infer diagnoses, select treatments, or anticipate future health outcomes under incomplete evidence.<n>LLM models are increasingly used to support these decisions due to strong language capabilities, broad biomedical knowledge, and efficiency.<n>The reliability of LLMs on real-world clinical decision tasks remains insufficiently understood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T22:38:26Z)
• PubMed Reasoner: Dynamic Reasoning-based Retrieval for Evidence-Grounded Biomedical Question Answering [12.717987334814692]
  We introduce PubMed Reasoner, a biomedical QA agent composed of three stages.<n>Self-critic query refinement evaluates MeSH terms for coverage, alignment, and redundancy to enhance PubMed queries.<n> reflective retrieval processes articles in batches until sufficient evidence is gathered.<n>Evidence-grounded response generation produces answers with explicit citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T16:41:57Z)
• Medical Reasoning with Large Language Models: A Survey and MR-Bench [41.12833582419578]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on medical exam-style tasks.<n>Clinical decision-making is inherently safety-critical, context-dependent, and conducted under evolving evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T09:03:09Z)
• META-RAG: Meta-Analysis-Inspired Evidence-Re-Ranking Method for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Evidence-Based Medicine [44.29858241971534]
  Evidence-based medicine (EBM) holds a crucial role in clinical application.<n>RAG applications in EBM struggle to efficiently distinguish high-quality evidence.<n>We provide a new method to re-rank and filter the medical evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T02:18:09Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• GEMeX-RMCoT: An Enhanced Med-VQA Dataset for Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [60.03671205298294]
  Medical visual question answering aims to support clinical decision-making by enabling models to answer natural language questions based on medical images.<n>Current methods still suffer from limited answer reliability and poor interpretability.<n>This work first proposes a Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought dataset, in which the process of producing an answer is preceded by a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T08:09:58Z)
• Systematic Literature Review on Clinical Trial Eligibility Matching [0.24554686192257422]
  Review highlights how explainable AI and standardized ontology can bolster clinician trust and broaden adoption.<n>Further research into advanced semantic and temporal representations, expanded data integration, and rigorous prospective evaluations is necessary to fully realize the transformative potential of NLP in clinical trial recruitment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T11:45:50Z)
• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• Explainable Biomedical Hypothesis Generation via Retrieval Augmented Generation enabled Large Language Models [46.05020842978823]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools to navigate this complex data landscape. RAGGED is a comprehensive workflow designed to support investigators with knowledge integration and hypothesis generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T07:44:18Z)
• Automated Scoring of Clinical Patient Notes using Advanced NLP and Pseudo Labeling [2.711804338865226]
  This research introduces an approach leveraging state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Our methodology enhances efficiency and effectiveness, significantly reducing training time without compromising performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T05:17:18Z)
• Emulating Human Cognitive Processes for Expert-Level Medical Question-Answering with Large Language Models [0.23463422965432823]
  BooksMed is a novel framework based on a Large Language Model (LLM) It emulates human cognitive processes to deliver evidence-based and reliable responses. We present ExpertMedQA, a benchmark comprised of open-ended, expert-level clinical questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T13:39:26Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• An Analysis of a BERT Deep Learning Strategy on a Technology Assisted Review Task [91.3755431537592]
  Document screening is a central task within Evidenced Based Medicine. I propose a DL document classification approach with BERT or PubMedBERT embeddings and a DL similarity search path. I test and evaluate the retrieval effectiveness of my DL strategy on the 2017 and 2018 CLEF eHealth collections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T19:45:27Z)
• CREATe: Clinical Report Extraction and Annotation Technology [53.731999072534876]
  Clinical case reports are written descriptions of the unique aspects of a particular clinical case. There has been no attempt to develop an end-to-end system to annotate, index, or otherwise curate these reports. We propose a novel computational resource platform, CREATe, for extracting, indexing, and querying the contents of clinical case reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-28T16:50:14Z)
• A Systematic Review of Natural Language Processing for Knowledge Management in Healthcare [0.6193838300896449]
  The objective of this paper is to identify the potential of NLP, especially, how NLP is used to support the knowledge management process in the healthcare domain. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art NLP research with a particular focus on how knowledge is created, captured, shared, and applied in the healthcare domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T17:50:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.