When Models Reason in Your Language: Controlling Thinking Trace Language Comes at the Cost of Accuracy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22888v1
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 21:44:12 GMT
• Title: When Models Reason in Your Language: Controlling Thinking Trace Language Comes at the Cost of Accuracy
• Authors: Jirui Qi, Shan Chen, Zidi Xiong, Raquel Fernández, Danielle S. Bitterman, Arianna Bisazza,
• Abstract summary: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) with thinking traces have shown strong performance on English reasoning tasks.<n>This capability is as important as answer accuracy for real world applications because users may find the reasoning trace useful for oversight only when it is expressed in their own language.<n>We evaluate two leading families of LRMs on our XReasoning benchmark and find that even the most advanced models often revert to English or produce fragmented reasoning in other languages.
• Score: 9.021965237274244
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) with thinking traces have shown strong performance on English reasoning tasks. However, their ability to think in other languages is less studied. This capability is as important as answer accuracy for real world applications because users may find the reasoning trace useful for oversight only when it is expressed in their own language. We comprehensively evaluate two leading families of LRMs on our XReasoning benchmark and find that even the most advanced models often revert to English or produce fragmented reasoning in other languages, revealing a substantial gap in multilingual reasoning. Prompt based interventions that force models to reason in the users language improve readability and oversight but reduce answer accuracy, exposing an important trade off. We further show that targeted post training on just 100 examples mitigates this mismatch, though some accuracy loss remains. Our results highlight the limited multilingual reasoning capabilities of current LRMs and outline directions for future work. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Betswish/mCoT-XReasoning.

Related papers

• Learn Globally, Speak Locally: Bridging the Gaps in Multilingual Reasoning [38.52080213211765]
  We introduce GeoFact-X, a geography-based multilingual factual reasoning benchmark with annotated reasoning traces in five languages.<n>We propose BRIDGE, a novel training method that guides supervised fine-tuning and test-time reinforcement learning.<n>Our results show that BRIDGE significantly enhances multilingual reasoning fidelity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T19:04:36Z)
• EfficientXLang: Towards Improving Token Efficiency Through Cross-Lingual Reasoning [12.511775058257328]
  We investigate whether English is the most token-efficient language for reasoning.<n>We find that reasoning in non-English languages not only reduces token usage, but also preserves accuracy.<n>The extent of improvement depends on the models multilingual strength.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T20:29:52Z)
• Cross-lingual Collapse: How Language-Centric Foundation Models Shape Reasoning in Large Language Models [44.94287386776289]
  We identify textbfCross-lingual Collapse, a systematic drift in which a multilingual language model reverts to its dominant pre-training language.<n>Our experiments reveal three key findings: (i) GRPO rapidly amplifies pre-training language imbalances, leading to the erosion of low-resource languages within just a few hundred updates; (ii) language consistency reward mitigates this drift but does so at the expense of an almost 5 - 10 pp drop in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T08:08:48Z)
• Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall Pipeline [36.2731426595852]
  We find that multilingual large language models (LLMs) exhibit significantly better performance in factual recall tasks in English than in other languages.<n>We identify two primary sources of error: insufficient engagement of the reliable English-centric mechanism for factual recall, and incorrect translation from English back into the target language.<n>Our interventions combined increase the recall accuracy by over 35 percent for the lowest-performing language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T22:20:45Z)
• MMATH: A Multilingual Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning [94.05289799605957]
  We introduce MMATH, a benchmark for multilingual complex reasoning spanning 374 high-quality math problems across 10 typologically diverse languages.<n>We observe that even advanced models like DeepSeek R1 exhibit substantial performance disparities across languages and suffer from a critical off-target issue-generating responses in unintended languages.<n>Our findings offer new insights and practical strategies for advancing the multilingual reasoning capabilities of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T12:47:39Z)
• Language Matters: How Do Multilingual Input and Reasoning Paths Affect Large Reasoning Models? [59.970391602080205]
  Despite multilingual training, LRMs tend to default to reasoning in high-resource languages at test time.<n>Cultural reasoning degrades performance on reasoning tasks but benefits cultural tasks, while safety evaluations exhibit language-specific behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T02:46:18Z)
• When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners [111.50503126693444]
  We show that language-specific ablation consistently boosts multilingual reasoning performance.<n>Compared to post-training, our training-free ablation achieves comparable or superior results with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T08:35:05Z)
• Language Mixing in Reasoning Language Models: Patterns, Impact, and Internal Causes [49.770097731093216]
  Reasoning language models (RLMs) excel at complex tasks by leveraging a chain-of-thought process to generate structured intermediate steps.<n> Language mixing, i.e., reasoning steps containing tokens from languages other than the prompt, has been observed in their outputs and shown to affect performance.<n>We present the first systematic study of language mixing in RLMs, examining its patterns, impact, and internal causes across 15 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T18:26:53Z)
• Crosslingual Reasoning through Test-Time Scaling [51.55526326294275]
  We find that scaling up inference compute for English-centric reasoning language models (RLMs) improves multilingual mathematical reasoning across many languages.<n>While English-centric RLM's CoTs are naturally predominantly English, they consistently follow a quote-and-think pattern to reason about quoted non-English inputs.<n>We observe poor out-of-domain reasoning generalization, in particular from STEM to cultural commonsense knowledge, even for English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T16:50:06Z)
• Demystifying Multilingual Chain-of-Thought in Process Reward Modeling [71.12193680015622]
  We tackle the challenge of extending process reward models (PRMs) to multilingual settings.<n>We train multilingual PRMs on a dataset spanning seven languages, which is translated from English.<n>Our results highlight the sensitivity of multilingual PRMs to both the number of training languages and the volume of English data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T09:11:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.