TimeHC-RL: Temporal-aware Hierarchical Cognitive Reinforcement Learning for Enhancing LLMs' Social Intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24500v1
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 12:01:06 GMT
- Title: TimeHC-RL: Temporal-aware Hierarchical Cognitive Reinforcement Learning for Enhancing LLMs' Social Intelligence
- Authors: Guiyang Hou, Xing Gao, Yuchuan Wu, Xiang Huang, Wenqi Zhang, Zhe Zheng, Yongliang Shen, Jialu Du, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li, Weiming Lu,
- Abstract summary: We introduce Temporal-aware Hierarchical Cognitive Reinforcement Learning (TimeHC-RL) for enhancing Large Language Models' social intelligence.<n> Experimental results reveal the superiority of our proposed TimeHC-RL method compared to the widely adopted System 2 RL method.<n>It gives the 7B backbone model wings, enabling it to rival the performance of advanced models like DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI-O3.
- Score: 62.21106561772784
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in IQ-related domains that require careful thinking, such as mathematics and coding. However, enhancing LLMs' cognitive development in social domains, particularly from a post-training perspective, remains underexplored. Recognizing that the social world follows a distinct timeline and requires a richer blend of cognitive modes (from intuitive reactions (System 1) and surface-level thinking to deliberate thinking (System 2)) than mathematics, which primarily relies on System 2 cognition (careful, step-by-step reasoning), we introduce Temporal-aware Hierarchical Cognitive Reinforcement Learning (TimeHC-RL) for enhancing LLMs' social intelligence. In our experiments, we systematically explore improving LLMs' social intelligence and validate the effectiveness of the TimeHC-RL method, through five other post-training paradigms and two test-time intervention paradigms on eight datasets with diverse data patterns. Experimental results reveal the superiority of our proposed TimeHC-RL method compared to the widely adopted System 2 RL method. It gives the 7B backbone model wings, enabling it to rival the performance of advanced models like DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI-O3. Additionally, the systematic exploration from post-training and test-time interventions perspectives to improve LLMs' social intelligence has uncovered several valuable insights.
Related papers
- Decoupling Knowledge and Reasoning in LLMs: An Exploration Using Cognitive Dual-System Theory [2.8952499264943445]
Large language models (LLMs) leverage both knowledge and reasoning during inference.<n>We propose a cognition attribution framework to decouple the contribution of knowledge and reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-24T08:24:52Z) - Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities [62.05713042908654]
This paper provides a review of advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>We highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data and discuss the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-17T14:22:24Z) - A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z) - R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z) - From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models [72.99519859756602]
Foundational Large Language Models excel at fast decision-making but lack depth for complex reasoning.<n>OpenAI's o1/o3 and DeepSeek's R1 have demonstrated expert-level performance in fields such as mathematics and coding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-24T18:50:52Z) - CogniDual Framework: Self-Training Large Language Models within a Dual-System Theoretical Framework for Improving Cognitive Tasks [39.43278448546028]
Kahneman's dual-system theory elucidates the human decision-making process, distinguishing between the rapid, intuitive System 1 and the deliberative, rational System 2.
Recent advancements have positioned large language Models (LLMs) as formidable tools nearing human-level proficiency in various cognitive tasks.
This study introduces the textbfCogniDual Framework for LLMs (CFLLMs), designed to assess whether LLMs can, through self-training, evolve from deliberate deduction to intuitive responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T09:33:24Z) - Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making.
Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations.
Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.