RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00789v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 02:42:36 GMT
• Title: RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
• Authors: Yixiao Zeng, Tianyu Cao, Danqing Wang, Xinran Zhao, Zimeng Qiu, Morteza Ziyadi, Tongshuang Wu, Lei Li,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances recency and factuality in answers.<n>Existing evaluations rarely test how well these systems cope with real-world noise, conflicting between internal and external retrieved contexts, or fast-changing facts.<n>We introduce Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation (RARE), a unified framework and large-scale benchmark that jointly stress-test query and document perturbations over dynamic, time-sensitive corpora.
• Score: 35.47591417637136
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances recency and factuality in answers. However, existing evaluations rarely test how well these systems cope with real-world noise, conflicting between internal and external retrieved contexts, or fast-changing facts. We introduce Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation (RARE), a unified framework and large-scale benchmark that jointly stress-tests query and document perturbations over dynamic, time-sensitive corpora. One of the central features of RARE is a knowledge-graph-driven synthesis pipeline (RARE-Get) that automatically extracts single and multi-hop relations from the customized corpus and generates multi-level question sets without manual intervention. Leveraging this pipeline, we construct a dataset (RARE-Set) spanning 400 expert-level time-sensitive finance, economics, and policy documents and 48,322 questions whose distribution evolves as the underlying sources change. To quantify resilience, we formalize retrieval-conditioned robustness metrics (RARE-Met) that capture a model's ability to remain correct or recover when queries, documents, or real-world retrieval results are systematically altered. Our results show that RAG systems exhibit surprising vulnerability to perturbations, with document robustness consistently being the weakest point regardless of generator size or architecture. RAG systems consistently show lower robustness on multi-hop queries than single-hop queries across all domains.

Related papers

• Investigating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the Query Level [4.3028340012580975]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been proposed as a solution that dynamically incorporates external knowledge during inference.<n>Despite its promise, RAG systems face practical challenges-most notably, a strong dependence on the quality of the input query for accurate retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T15:39:17Z)
• Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Data [73.55304268238474]
  We present a new benchmark for evaluating a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>RAG requires source-aware, multi-hop reasoning over diverse, sparsed, but related sources.<n>We build it using a synthetic data pipeline that simulates business across product planning, development, and support stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T08:34:59Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Enhancements, and Robustness Frontiers [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful paradigm to enhance large language models.<n>RAG introduces new challenges in retrieval quality, grounding fidelity, pipeline efficiency, and robustness against noisy or adversarial inputs.<n>This survey aims to consolidate current knowledge in RAG research and serve as a foundation for the next generation of retrieval-augmented language modeling systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T22:57:04Z)
• MIRAGE: A Metric-Intensive Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation [8.950307082012763]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has gained prominence as an effective method for enhancing the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We present MIRAGE, a Question Answering dataset specifically designed for RAG evaluation.<n>MIRAGE consists of 7,560 curated instances mapped to a retrieval pool of 37,800 entries, enabling an efficient and precise evaluation of both retrieval and generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T23:05:46Z)
• MultiConIR: Towards multi-condition Information Retrieval [57.6405602406446]
  We introduce MultiConIR, the first benchmark designed to evaluate retrieval models in multi-condition scenarios.<n>We propose three tasks to assess retrieval and reranking models on multi-condition robustness, monotonic relevance ranking, and query format sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T05:02:03Z)
• Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
  UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)
• Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
  I propose a novel Comparative RAG system that introduces an evaluator module to bridge the gap between probabilistic RAG systems and deterministically verifiable responses.<n>This framework paves the way for more reliable and scalable question-answering applications in domains requiring high precision and verifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:52:06Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Scalable and Stable RAG Systems [51.171355532527365]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances language models by integrating external knowledge.<n>RAGGED is a framework for systematically evaluating RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T02:26:31Z)
• CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [49.16989035566899]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources. This paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:25:32Z)
• Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation [36.04062963574603]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies heavily on relevance of retrieved documents, raising concerns about how the model behaves if retrieval goes wrong. We propose the Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) to improve the robustness of generation. CRAG is plug-and-play and can be seamlessly coupled with various RAG-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T04:36:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.