Discrete Minds in a Continuous World: Do Language Models Know Time Passes?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05790v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 06:37:01 GMT
• Title: Discrete Minds in a Continuous World: Do Language Models Know Time Passes?
• Authors: Minghan Wang, Ye Bai, Thuy-Trang Vu, Ehsan Shareghi, Gholamreza Haffari,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at temporal reasoning tasks like event ordering and duration estimation.<n>We investigate whether LLMs perceive the passage of time and adapt their decision-making accordingly.
• Score: 44.46759661130471
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at temporal reasoning tasks like event ordering and duration estimation, their ability to perceive the actual passage of time remains unexplored. We investigate whether LLMs perceive the passage of time and adapt their decision-making accordingly through three complementary experiments. First, we introduce the Token-Time Hypothesis, positing that LLMs can map discrete token counts to continuous wall-clock time, and validate this through a dialogue duration judgment task. Second, we demonstrate that LLMs could use this awareness to adapt their response length while maintaining accuracy when users express urgency in question answering tasks. Finally, we develop BombRush, an interactive navigation challenge that examines how LLMs modify behavior under progressive time pressure in dynamic environments. Our findings indicate that LLMs possess certain awareness of time passage, enabling them to bridge discrete linguistic tokens and continuous physical time, though this capability varies with model size and reasoning abilities. This work establishes a theoretical foundation for enhancing temporal awareness in LLMs for time-sensitive applications.

Related papers

• TransientTables: Evaluating LLMs' Reasoning on Temporally Evolving Semi-structured Tables [47.85408648193376]
  Large language models (LLMs) are typically trained on static datasets, limiting their ability to perform effective temporal reasoning.<n>We present the TRANSIENTTABLES dataset, which comprises 3,971 questions derived from over 14,000 tables, spanning 1,238 entities across multiple time periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T16:34:43Z)
• A Study into Investigating Temporal Robustness of LLMs [19.067901534284395]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) encapsulate a surprising amount of factual world knowledge.<n>We aim to measure precisely how robust LLMs are for question answering based on their ability to process temporal information.<n>We show how a selection of these eight tests can be used automatically to judge a model's temporal robustness for user questions on the fly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T11:56:17Z)
• Position: Empowering Time Series Reasoning with Multimodal LLMs [49.73647759532127]
  We argue that multimodal language models (MLLMs) can enable more powerful and flexible reasoning for time series analysis.<n>We call on researchers and practitioners to leverage this potential by developing strategies that prioritize trust, interpretability, and robust reasoning in MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T16:10:48Z)
• Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning? [70.19200858203388]
  Temporal reasoning is fundamental for large language models to comprehend the world. CoTempQA is a benchmark containing four co-temporal scenarios. Our experiments reveal a significant gap between the performance of current LLMs and human-level reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T12:56:21Z)
• The Strong Pull of Prior Knowledge in Large Language Models and Its Impact on Emotion Recognition [74.04775677110179]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLM) We show that LLMs have strong yet inconsistent priors in emotion recognition that ossify their predictions. Our results suggest that caution is needed when using ICL with larger LLMs for affect-centered tasks outside their pre-training domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:07:32Z)
• Temporal Blind Spots in Large Language Models [20.631107338678234]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently gained significant attention due to their unparalleled ability to perform various natural language processing tasks. This study investigates the underlying limitations of general-purpose LLMs when deployed for tasks that require a temporal understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T16:20:14Z)
• Towards Robust Temporal Reasoning of Large Language Models via a Multi-Hop QA Dataset and Pseudo-Instruction Tuning [73.51314109184197]
  It is crucial for large language models (LLMs) to understand the concept of temporal knowledge. We propose a complex temporal question-answering dataset Complex-TR that focuses on multi-answer and multi-hop temporal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T11:49:29Z)
• Temporal Knowledge Question Answering via Abstract Reasoning Induction [32.08799860090592]
  This study addresses the challenge of enhancing temporal knowledge reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose Abstract Reasoning Induction (ARI) framework, which divides temporal reasoning into two distinct phases: Knowledge-agnostic and Knowledge-based. Our approach achieves remarkable improvements, with relative gains of 29.7% and 9.27% on two temporal QA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T17:46:39Z)
• MenatQA: A New Dataset for Testing the Temporal Comprehension and Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models [17.322480769274062]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown nearly saturated performance on many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This paper constructs Multiple Sensitive Factors Time QA (MenatQA) with total 2,853 samples for evaluating the time comprehension and reasoning abilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T13:19:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.