Membership Inference Attacks for Unseen Classes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06488v2
• Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 21:13:10 GMT
• Title: Membership Inference Attacks for Unseen Classes
• Authors: Pratiksha Thaker, Neil Kale, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Virginia Smith,
• Abstract summary: We show that attacks relying on shadow models can fail catastrophically on critical AI safety applications.<n>Although this problem seems intractable within the shadow model paradigm, we find that quantile regression attacks are a promising approach.
• Score: 34.7456021961386
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The state-of-the-art for membership inference attacks on machine learning models is a class of attacks based on shadow models that mimic the behavior of the target model on subsets of held-out nonmember data. However, we find that this class of attacks is fundamentally limited because of a key assumption -- that the shadow models can replicate the target model's behavior on the distribution of interest. As a result, we show that attacks relying on shadow models can fail catastrophically on critical AI safety applications where data access is restricted due to legal, ethical, or logistical constraints, so that the shadow models have no reasonable signal on the query examples. Although this problem seems intractable within the shadow model paradigm, we find that quantile regression attacks are a promising approach in this setting, as these models learn features of member examples that can generalize to unseen classes. We demonstrate this both empirically and theoretically, showing that quantile regression attacks achieve up to 11x the TPR of shadow model-based approaches in practice, and providing a theoretical model that outlines the generalization properties required for this approach to succeed. Our work identifies an important failure mode in existing MIAs and provides a cautionary tale for practitioners that aim to directly use existing tools for real-world applications of AI safety.

Related papers

• On Transfer-based Universal Attacks in Pure Black-box Setting [94.92884394009288]
  We study the role of prior knowledge of the target model data and number of classes in attack performance.<n>We also provide several interesting insights based on our analysis, and demonstrate that priors cause overestimation in transferability scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T10:41:20Z)
• Membership Inference Attacks on Diffusion Models via Quantile Regression [30.30033625685376]
  We demonstrate a privacy vulnerability of diffusion models through amembership inference (MI) attack. Our proposed MI attack learns quantile regression models that predict (a quantile of) the distribution of reconstruction loss on examples not used in training. We show that our attack outperforms the prior state-of-the-art attack while being substantially less computationally expensive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T16:21:24Z)
• Defense Against Model Extraction Attacks on Recommender Systems [53.127820987326295]
  We introduce Gradient-based Ranking Optimization (GRO) to defend against model extraction attacks on recommender systems. GRO aims to minimize the loss of the protected target model while maximizing the loss of the attacker's surrogate model. Results show GRO's superior effectiveness in defending against model extraction attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T03:30:42Z)
• SecurityNet: Assessing Machine Learning Vulnerabilities on Public Models [74.58014281829946]
  We analyze the effectiveness of several representative attacks/defenses, including model stealing attacks, membership inference attacks, and backdoor detection on public models. Our evaluation empirically shows the performance of these attacks/defenses can vary significantly on public models compared to self-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T11:49:22Z)
• OMG-ATTACK: Self-Supervised On-Manifold Generation of Transferable Evasion Attacks [17.584752814352502]
  Evasion Attacks (EA) are used to test the robustness of trained neural networks by distorting input data. We introduce a self-supervised, computationally economical method for generating adversarial examples. Our experiments consistently demonstrate the method is effective across various models, unseen data categories, and even defended models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T17:34:47Z)
• Scalable Membership Inference Attacks via Quantile Regression [35.33158339354343]
  Membership inference attacks are designed to determine, using black box access to trained models, whether a particular example was used in training or not. We introduce a new class of attacks based on performing quantile regression on the distribution of confidence scores induced by the model under attack on points that are not used in training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T16:07:00Z)
• Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectory [19.900473800648243]
  We propose a new attack method, called system, which can exploit the membership information from the whole training process of the target model. Our attack achieves at least 6$times$ higher true-positive rate at a low false-positive rate of 0.1% than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T16:02:26Z)
• An Efficient Subpopulation-based Membership Inference Attack [11.172550334631921]
  We introduce a fundamentally different MI attack approach which obviates the need to train hundreds of shadow models. We achieve the state-of-the-art membership inference accuracy while significantly reducing the training cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T00:52:06Z)
• Towards A Conceptually Simple Defensive Approach for Few-shot classifiers Against Adversarial Support Samples [107.38834819682315]
  We study a conceptually simple approach to defend few-shot classifiers against adversarial attacks. We propose a simple attack-agnostic detection method, using the concept of self-similarity and filtering. Our evaluation on the miniImagenet (MI) and CUB datasets exhibit good attack detection performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T05:46:03Z)
• Training Meta-Surrogate Model for Transferable Adversarial Attack [98.13178217557193]
  We consider adversarial attacks to a black-box model when no queries are allowed. In this setting, many methods directly attack surrogate models and transfer the obtained adversarial examples to fool the target model. We show we can obtain a Meta-Surrogate Model (MSM) such that attacks to this model can be easier transferred to other models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-05T03:27:46Z)
• Thief, Beware of What Get You There: Towards Understanding Model Extraction Attack [13.28881502612207]
  In some scenarios, AI models are trained proprietarily, where neither pre-trained models nor sufficient in-distribution data is publicly available. We find the effectiveness of existing techniques significantly affected by the absence of pre-trained models. We formulate model extraction attacks into an adaptive framework that captures these factors with deep reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-13T03:46:59Z)
• "What's in the box?!": Deflecting Adversarial Attacks by Randomly Deploying Adversarially-Disjoint Models [71.91835408379602]
  adversarial examples have been long considered a real threat to machine learning models. We propose an alternative deployment-based defense paradigm that goes beyond the traditional white-box and black-box threat models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T20:07:13Z)
• ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models [64.03398193325572]
  Inference attacks against Machine Learning (ML) models allow adversaries to learn about training data, model parameters, etc. We concentrate on four attacks - namely, membership inference, model inversion, attribute inference, and model stealing. Our analysis relies on a modular re-usable software, ML-Doctor, which enables ML model owners to assess the risks of deploying their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T11:35:13Z)
• Two Sides of the Same Coin: White-box and Black-box Attacks for Transfer Learning [60.784641458579124]
  We show that fine-tuning effectively enhances model robustness under white-box FGSM attacks. We also propose a black-box attack method for transfer learning models which attacks the target model with the adversarial examples produced by its source model. To systematically measure the effect of both white-box and black-box attacks, we propose a new metric to evaluate how transferable are the adversarial examples produced by a source model to a target model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-25T15:04:32Z)
• Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposures [10.875144776014533]
  We propose decision-based membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In particular, we develop two types of decision-based attacks, namely transfer attack, and boundary attack. We also present new insights on the success of membership inference based on quantitative and qualitative analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-30T15:27:55Z)
• Leveraging Siamese Networks for One-Shot Intrusion Detection Model [0.0]
  Supervised Machine Learning (ML) to enhance Intrusion Detection Systems has been the subject of significant research. retraining the models in-situ renders the network susceptible to attacks owing to the time-window required to acquire a sufficient volume of data. Here, a complementary approach referred to as 'One-Shot Learning', whereby a limited number of examples of a new attack-class is used to identify a new attack-class. A Siamese Network is trained to differentiate between classes based on pairs similarities, rather than features, allowing to identify new and previously unseen attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T11:40:01Z)
• Orthogonal Deep Models As Defense Against Black-Box Attacks [71.23669614195195]
  We study the inherent weakness of deep models in black-box settings where the attacker may develop the attack using a model similar to the targeted model. We introduce a novel gradient regularization scheme that encourages the internal representation of a deep model to be orthogonal to another. We verify the effectiveness of our technique on a variety of large-scale models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T08:29:05Z)
• Boosting Black-Box Attack with Partially Transferred Conditional Adversarial Distribution [83.02632136860976]
  We study black-box adversarial attacks against deep neural networks (DNNs) We develop a novel mechanism of adversarial transferability, which is robust to the surrogate biases. Experiments on benchmark datasets and attacking against real-world API demonstrate the superior attack performance of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T16:45:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.