Flattery in Motion: Benchmarking and Analyzing Sycophancy in Video-LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07180v1
• Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2025 15:00:21 GMT
• Title: Flattery in Motion: Benchmarking and Analyzing Sycophancy in Video-LLMs
• Authors: Wenrui Zhou, Shu Yang, Qingsong Yang, Zikun Guo, Lijie Hu, Di Wang,
• Abstract summary: Video large language models (Video-LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world applications that demand grounded multimodal reasoning.<n>Sycophancy, the tendency of these models to align with user input even when it contradicts the visual evidence, undermines their trustworthiness in such contexts.<n>We propose VISE (Video-LLM Sycophancy Benchmarking and Evaluation), the first dedicated benchmark designed to evaluate sycophantic behavior in state-of-the-art Video-LLMs.
• Score: 6.527988482383714
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As video large language models (Video-LLMs) become increasingly integrated into real-world applications that demand grounded multimodal reasoning, ensuring their factual consistency and reliability is of critical importance. However, sycophancy, the tendency of these models to align with user input even when it contradicts the visual evidence, undermines their trustworthiness in such contexts. Current sycophancy research has largely overlooked its specific manifestations in the video-language domain, resulting in a notable absence of systematic benchmarks and targeted evaluations to understand how Video-LLMs respond under misleading user input. To fill this gap, we propose VISE (Video-LLM Sycophancy Benchmarking and Evaluation), the first dedicated benchmark designed to evaluate sycophantic behavior in state-of-the-art Video-LLMs across diverse question formats, prompt biases, and visual reasoning tasks. Specifically, VISE pioneeringly brings linguistic perspectives on sycophancy into the visual domain, enabling fine-grained analysis across multiple sycophancy types and interaction patterns. In addition, we explore key-frame selection as an interpretable, training-free mitigation strategy, which reveals potential paths for reducing sycophantic bias by strengthening visual grounding.

Related papers

• HV-MMBench: Benchmarking MLLMs for Human-Centric Video Understanding [79.06209664703258]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant advances in visual understanding tasks involving both images and videos.<n>Existing human-centric benchmarks predominantly emphasize video generation quality and action recognition, while overlooking essential perceptual and cognitive abilities required in human-centered scenarios.<n>We propose a rigorously curated benchmark designed to provide a more holistic evaluation of MLLMs in human-centric video understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T11:52:24Z)
• From Sight to Insight: Unleashing Eye-Tracking in Weakly Supervised Video Salient Object Detection [60.11169426478452]
  This paper aims to introduce fixation information to assist the detection of salient objects under weak supervision.<n>We propose a Position and Semantic Embedding (PSE) module to provide location and semantic guidance during the feature learning process.<n>An Intra-Inter Mixed Contrastive (MCII) model improves thetemporal modeling capabilities under weak supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T05:01:40Z)
• ImplicitQA: Going beyond frames towards Implicit Video Reasoning [36.65883181090953]
  ImplicitQA is a novel benchmark designed to test models on implicit reasoning.<n>It comprises 1K meticulously annotated QA pairs derived from 320+ high-quality creative video clips.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T19:53:54Z)
• Interpreting Social Bias in LVLMs via Information Flow Analysis and Multi-Round Dialogue Evaluation [1.7997395646080083]
  Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in multimodal tasks, yet they also exhibit notable social biases.<n>We propose an explanatory framework that combines information flow analysis with multi-round dialogue evaluation.<n>Experiments reveal that LVLMs exhibit systematic disparities in information usage when processing images of different demographic groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T12:28:44Z)
• SurveillanceVQA-589K: A Benchmark for Comprehensive Surveillance Video-Language Understanding with Large Models [8.402075279942256]
  SurveillanceVQA-589K is the largest open-ended video question answering benchmark tailored to the surveillance domain.<n>The dataset comprises 589,380 QA pairs spanning 12 cognitively diverse question types.<n>Our benchmark provides a practical and comprehensive resource for advancing video-language understanding in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T00:57:04Z)
• Exploring Implicit Visual Misunderstandings in Multimodal Large Language Models through Attention Analysis [21.869968563545736]
  We define implicit visual misunderstanding (IVM), where MLLMs provide correct answers without fully comprehending the visual input.<n>We introduce a scale-agnostic metric, textitattention accuracy, and a novel benchmark for quantifying IVMs.<n>We extend our approach to finer granularities and demonstrate its effectiveness in unimodal scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T17:52:40Z)
• VACT: A Video Automatic Causal Testing System and a Benchmark [55.53300306960048]
  VACT is an **automated** framework for modeling, evaluating, and measuring the causal understanding of VGMs in real-world scenarios.<n>We introduce multi-level causal evaluation metrics to provide a detailed analysis of the causal performance of VGMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T10:54:42Z)
• Retrieval-Based Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought in Real-World Driving Scenarios [69.00444996464662]
  We propose RIV-CoT, a Retrieval-Based Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought method that enables vision-language models to reason using visual crops corresponding to relevant entities.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that RIV-CoT improves answer accuracy by 3.1% and reasoning accuracy by 4.6% over vanilla CoT prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T18:31:16Z)
• Improving Dynamic Object Interactions in Text-to-Video Generation with AI Feedback [130.090296560882]
  We investigate the use of feedback to enhance the object dynamics in text-to-video models.<n>We show that our method can effectively optimize a wide variety of rewards, with binary AI feedback driving the most significant improvements in video quality for dynamic interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T17:44:23Z)
• Object-Centric Temporal Consistency via Conditional Autoregressive Inductive Biases [69.46487306858789]
  Conditional Autoregressive Slot Attention (CA-SA) is a framework that enhances the temporal consistency of extracted object-centric representations in video-centric vision tasks. We present qualitative and quantitative results showing that our proposed method outperforms the considered baselines on downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:44:44Z)
• Prompting Video-Language Foundation Models with Domain-specific Fine-grained Heuristics for Video Question Answering [71.62961521518731]
  HeurVidQA is a framework that leverages domain-specific entity-actions to refine pre-trained video-language foundation models. Our approach treats these models as implicit knowledge engines, employing domain-specific entity-action prompters to direct the model's focus toward precise cues that enhance reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T06:22:23Z)
• Sycophancy in Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis and an Inference-Time Mitigation Framework [18.54098084470481]
  We analyze sycophancy across vision-language benchmarks and propose an inference-time mitigation framework.<n>Our framework effectively mitigates sycophancy across all evaluated models, while maintaining performance on neutral prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T01:03:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.