E-LDA: Toward Interpretable LDA Topic Models with Strong Guarantees in Logarithmic Parallel Time

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07747v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 07:05:48 GMT
• Title: E-LDA: Toward Interpretable LDA Topic Models with Strong Guarantees in Logarithmic Parallel Time
• Authors: Adam Breuer,
• Abstract summary: We provide the first practical algorithms with provable guarantees for the problem of inferring the topics assigned to each document in an LDA topic model.<n>This is the primary inference problem for many applications of topic models in social science, data exploration, and causal inference settings.
• Score: 2.810160553339817
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we provide the first practical algorithms with provable guarantees for the problem of inferring the topics assigned to each document in an LDA topic model. This is the primary inference problem for many applications of topic models in social science, data exploration, and causal inference settings. We obtain this result by showing a novel non-gradient-based, combinatorial approach to estimating topic models. This yields algorithms that converge to near-optimal posterior probability in logarithmic parallel computation time (adaptivity) -- exponentially faster than any known LDA algorithm. We also show that our approach can provide interpretability guarantees such that each learned topic is formally associated with a known keyword. Finally, we show that unlike alternatives, our approach can maintain the independence assumptions necessary to use the learned topic model for downstream causal inference methods that allow researchers to study topics as treatments. In terms of practical performance, our approach consistently returns solutions of higher semantic quality than solutions from state-of-the-art LDA algorithms, neural topic models, and LLM-based topic models across a diverse range of text datasets and evaluation parameters.

Related papers

• Position: We Need An Algorithmic Understanding of Generative AI [7.425924654036041]
  This position paper proposes AlgEval: a framework for systematic research into the algorithms that LLMs learn and use.<n>AlgEval aims to uncover algorithmic primitives, reflected in latent representations, attention, and inference-time compute, and their algorithmic composition to solve task-specific problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T08:38:47Z)
• Asymptotically Optimal Linear Best Feasible Arm Identification with Fixed Budget [55.938644481736446]
  We introduce a novel algorithm for best feasible arm identification that guarantees an exponential decay in the error probability.<n>We validate our algorithm through comprehensive empirical evaluations across various problem instances with different levels of complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T02:56:26Z)
• Absolute Ranking: An Essential Normalization for Benchmarking Optimization Algorithms [0.0]
  evaluating performance across optimization algorithms on many problems presents a complex challenge due to the diversity of numerical scales involved. This paper extensively explores the problem, making a compelling case to underscore the issue and conducting a thorough analysis of its root causes. Building on this research, this paper introduces a new mathematical model called "absolute ranking" and a sampling-based computational method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T00:55:03Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• SEGO: Sequential Subgoal Optimization for Mathematical Problem-Solving [64.38649623473626]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven substantial progress in artificial intelligence. We propose a novel framework called textbfSEquential subtextbfGoal textbfOptimization (SEGO) to enhance LLMs' ability to solve mathematical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T17:56:40Z)
• Geometry-Aware Approaches for Balancing Performance and Theoretical Guarantees in Linear Bandits [5.847084649531299]
  Thompson sampling and Greedy demonstrate promising empirical performance, yet this contrasts with their pessimistic theoretical regret bounds.<n>We propose a new data-driven technique that tracks the geometric properties of the uncertainty ellipsoid around the main problem parameter.<n>This methodology enables us to formulate a data-driven frequentist regret bound, which incorporates the geometric information, for a broad class of base algorithms, including Greedy, OFUL, and Thompson sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T17:38:45Z)
• A Deep Unrolling Model with Hybrid Optimization Structure for Hyperspectral Image Deconvolution [50.13564338607482]
  We propose a novel optimization framework for the hyperspectral deconvolution problem, called DeepMix.<n>It consists of three distinct modules, namely, a data consistency module, a module that enforces the effect of the handcrafted regularizers, and a denoising module.<n>This work proposes a context aware denoising module designed to sustain the advancements achieved by the cooperative efforts of the other modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-10T08:25:16Z)
• Multivariate Systemic Risk Measures and Computation by Deep Learning Algorithms [63.03966552670014]
  We discuss the key related theoretical aspects, with a particular focus on the fairness properties of primal optima and associated risk allocations. The algorithms we provide allow for learning primals, optima for the dual representation and corresponding fair risk allocations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T22:16:49Z)
• Learning to Bound Counterfactual Inference in Structural Causal Models from Observational and Randomised Data [64.96984404868411]
  We derive a likelihood characterisation for the overall data that leads us to extend a previous EM-based algorithm. The new algorithm learns to approximate the (unidentifiability) region of model parameters from such mixed data sources. It delivers interval approximations to counterfactual results, which collapse to points in the identifiable case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T12:42:11Z)
• Neural Improvement Heuristics for Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems [49.85111302670361]
  We introduce a novel Neural Improvement (NI) model capable of handling graph-based problems where information is encoded in the nodes, edges, or both. The presented model serves as a fundamental component for hill-climbing-based algorithms that guide the selection of neighborhood operations for each.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T10:35:29Z)
• Exploring Viable Algorithmic Options for Learning from Demonstration (LfD): A Parameterized Complexity Approach [0.0]
  In this paper, we show how such a systematic exploration of algorithmic options can be done using parameterized complexity analysis. We show that none of our problems can be solved efficiently either in general or relative to a number of (often simultaneous) restrictions on environments, demonstrations, and policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T15:54:06Z)
• Instance-Dependent Confidence and Early Stopping for Reinforcement Learning [99.57168572237421]
  Various algorithms for reinforcement learning (RL) exhibit dramatic variation in their convergence rates as a function of problem structure. This research provides guarantees that explain textitex post the performance differences observed. A natural next step is to convert these theoretical guarantees into guidelines that are useful in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T04:25:35Z)
• An Information-Theoretic Framework for Unifying Active Learning Problems [44.758281991246825]
  This paper presents an information-theoretic framework for unifying active learning problems. We first introduce a novel active learning criterion that subsumes an existing LSE algorithm. By exploiting the relationship between LSE and BO, we design a competitive information-theoretic acquisition function for BO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T14:22:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.