Exposing Hidden Backdoors in NFT Smart Contracts: A Static Security Analysis of Rug Pull Patterns

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07974v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 17:49:04 GMT
• Title: Exposing Hidden Backdoors in NFT Smart Contracts: A Static Security Analysis of Rug Pull Patterns
• Authors: Chetan Pathade, Shweta Hooli,
• Abstract summary: rug pulls are schemes where developers exploit trust and smart contract privileges to drain user funds or invalidate asset ownership.<n>We present a large-scale static analysis of 49,940 verified NFT smart contracts using Slither, a static analysis framework.<n>Our results reveal how malicious patterns often missed by simple reviews can be surfaced through static analysis at scale.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The explosive growth of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) has revolutionized digital ownership by enabling the creation, exchange, and monetization of unique assets on blockchain networks. However, this surge in popularity has also given rise to a disturbing trend: the emergence of rug pulls - fraudulent schemes where developers exploit trust and smart contract privileges to drain user funds or invalidate asset ownership. Central to many of these scams are hidden backdoors embedded within NFT smart contracts. Unlike unintentional bugs, these backdoors are deliberately coded and often obfuscated to bypass traditional audits and exploit investor confidence. In this paper, we present a large-scale static analysis of 49,940 verified NFT smart contracts using Slither, a static analysis framework, to uncover latent vulnerabilities commonly linked to rug pulls. We introduce a custom risk scoring model that classifies contracts into high, medium, or low risk tiers based on the presence and severity of rug pull indicators. Our dataset was derived from verified contracts on the Ethereum mainnet, and we generate multiple visualizations to highlight red flag clusters, issue prevalence, and co-occurrence of critical vulnerabilities. While we do not perform live exploits, our results reveal how malicious patterns often missed by simple reviews can be surfaced through static analysis at scale. We conclude by offering mitigation strategies for developers, marketplaces, and auditors to enhance smart contract security. By exposing how hidden backdoors manifest in real-world smart contracts, this work contributes a practical foundation for detecting and mitigating NFT rug pulls through scalable automated analysis.

Related papers

• Decompiling Smart Contracts with a Large Language Model [51.49197239479266]
  Despite Etherscan's 78,047,845 smart contracts deployed on (as of May 26, 2025), a mere 767,520 ( 1%) are open source.<n>This opacity necessitates the automated semantic analysis of on-chain smart contract bytecode.<n>We introduce a pioneering decompilation pipeline that transforms bytecode into human-readable and semantically faithful Solidity code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T13:42:59Z)
• EthCluster: An Unsupervised Static Analysis Method for Ethereum Smart Contract [1.1923665587866032]
  We train a model using unsupervised learning to identify vulnerabilities in the Solidity source code of smart contracts.<n>To address the challenges associated with real-world smart contracts, our training data is derived from actual vulnerability samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T08:36:21Z)
• To Think or Not to Think: Exploring the Unthinking Vulnerability in Large Reasoning Models [56.19026073319406]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are designed to solve complex tasks by generating explicit reasoning traces before producing final answers.<n>We reveal a critical vulnerability in LRMs -- termed Unthinking -- wherein the thinking process can be bypassed by manipulating special tokens.<n>In this paper, we investigate this vulnerability from both malicious and beneficial perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T10:45:56Z)
• Versioned Analysis of Software Quality Indicators and Self-admitted Technical Debt in Ethereum Smart Contracts with Ethstractor [2.052808596154225]
  This paper proposes Ethstractor, the first smart contract collection tool for gathering a dataset of versioned smart contracts. The collected dataset is then used to evaluate the reliability of code metrics as indicators of vulnerabilities in smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T18:27:29Z)
• LookAhead: Preventing DeFi Attacks via Unveiling Adversarial Contracts [15.071155232677643]
  Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has resulted in financial losses exceeding 3 billion US dollars.<n>Current detection tools face significant challenges in identifying attack activities effectively.<n>We propose LookAhead, a new framework for detecting DeFi attacks via unveiling adversarial contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T11:39:33Z)
• G$^2$uardFL: Safeguarding Federated Learning Against Backdoor Attacks through Attributed Client Graph Clustering [116.4277292854053]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers collaborative model training without data sharing. FL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where poisoned model weights lead to compromised system integrity. We present G$2$uardFL, a protective framework that reinterprets the identification of malicious clients as an attributed graph clustering problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:15:04Z)
• Definition and Detection of Defects in NFT Smart Contracts [34.359991158202796]
  Defects in NFT smart contracts could be exploited by attackers to harm the security and reliability of the NFT ecosystem. In this paper, we introduce 5 defects in NFT smart contracts and propose a tool named NFTGuard to detect these defects. We find that 1,331 contracts contain at least one of the 5 defects, and the overall precision achieved by our tool is 92.6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T08:17:05Z)
• An Automated Vulnerability Detection Framework for Smart Contracts [18.758795474791427]
  We propose a framework to automatically detect vulnerabilities in smart contracts on the blockchain. More specifically, first, we utilize novel feature vector generation techniques from bytecode of smart contract. Next, the collected vectors are fed into our novel metric learning-based deep neural network(DNN) to get the detection result.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-20T23:16:04Z)
• Untargeted Backdoor Attack against Object Detection [69.63097724439886]
  We design a poison-only backdoor attack in an untargeted manner, based on task characteristics. We show that, once the backdoor is embedded into the target model by our attack, it can trick the model to lose detection of any object stamped with our trigger patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T17:05:45Z)
• Check Your Other Door! Establishing Backdoor Attacks in the Frequency Domain [80.24811082454367]
  We show the advantages of utilizing the frequency domain for establishing undetectable and powerful backdoor attacks. We also show two possible defences that succeed against frequency-based backdoor attacks and possible ways for the attacker to bypass them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-12T12:44:52Z)
• Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: From Pure Neural Network to Interpretable Graph Feature and Expert Pattern Fusion [48.744359070088166]
  Conventional smart contract vulnerability detection methods heavily rely on fixed expert rules. Recent deep learning approaches alleviate this issue but fail to encode useful expert knowledge. We develop automatic tools to extract expert patterns from the source code. We then cast the code into a semantic graph to extract deep graph features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T07:12:13Z)
• ESCORT: Ethereum Smart COntRacTs Vulnerability Detection using Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning [80.85273827468063]
  Existing machine learning-based vulnerability detection methods are limited and only inspect whether the smart contract is vulnerable. We propose ESCORT, the first Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based vulnerability detection framework for smart contracts. We show that ESCORT achieves an average F1-score of 95% on six vulnerability types and the detection time is 0.02 seconds per contract.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T15:04:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.