Distortion Search, A Web Search Privacy Heuristic
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08330v1
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 01:35:16 GMT
- Title: Distortion Search, A Web Search Privacy Heuristic
- Authors: Kato Mivule, Kenneth Hopkinson,
- Abstract summary: Search engines have vast technical capabilities to retain Internet search logs for each user.<n>Many web search privacy enhancing tools require that the user trusts a third party.<n>We suggest a user-centric, Distortion Search, a web search query privacy methodology.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Search engines have vast technical capabilities to retain Internet search logs for each user and thus present major privacy vulnerabilities to both individuals and organizations in revealing user intent. Additionally, many of the web search privacy enhancing tools available today require that the user trusts a third party, which make confidentiality of user intent even more challenging. The user is left at the mercy of the third party without the control over his or her own privacy. In this article, we suggest a user-centric heuristic, Distortion Search, a web search query privacy methodology that works by the formation of obfuscated search queries via the permutation of query keyword categories, and by strategically applying k-anonymised web navigational clicks on URLs and Ads to generate a distorted user profile and thus providing specific user intent and query confidentiality. We provide empirical results via the evaluation of distorted web search queries in terms of retrieved search results and the resulting web ads from search engines. Preliminary experimental results indicate that web search query and specific user intent privacy might be achievable from the user side without the involvement of the search engine or other third parties.
Related papers
- Hiding in Plain Sight: Query Obfuscation via Random Multilingual Searches [1.3654846342364308]
personalization can enhance relevance, it introduces privacy risks and can lead to filter bubbles.<n>This paper proposes and evaluates a lightweight, client-side query obfuscation strategy using randomly generated multilingual search queries.<n>Our findings show that while displayed search results remain largely stable, the search engine's identified user interests shift significantly under obfuscation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T12:38:08Z) - Content Moderation in TV Search: Balancing Policy Compliance, Relevance, and User Experience [2.0201819034973933]
We introduce an additional monitoring layer using Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance content moderation.<n>This additional layer flags content if the user did not intend to search for it.<n>This approach serves as a baseline for product quality assurance, with collected feedback used to refine the initial retrieval mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T18:32:39Z) - NExT-Search: Rebuilding User Feedback Ecosystem for Generative AI Search [108.42163676745085]
We envision NExT-Search, a next-generation paradigm designed to reintroduce fine-grained, process-level feedback into generative AI search.<n> NExT-Search integrates two complementary modes: User Debug Mode, which allows engaged users to intervene at key stages; and Shadow User Mode, where a personalized user agent simulates user preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T17:59:13Z) - Digital Gatekeeping: An Audit of Search Engine Results shows tailoring of queries on the Israel-Palestine Conflict [3.9633322041283665]
We focus on the Israel-Palestine conflict and developed a privacy-protecting tool to audit the behavior of three search engines: DuckDuckGo, Google and Yahoo.<n>Our findings revealed significant customization based on location and browsing preferences, unlike previous studies that found only mild personalization for general topics.<n> queries related to the conflict were more customized than unrelated queries, and the results were not neutral concerning the conflict's portrayal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-06T18:05:30Z) - Fingerprinting and Tracing Shadows: The Development and Impact of Browser Fingerprinting on Digital Privacy [55.2480439325792]
Browser fingerprinting is a growing technique for identifying and tracking users online without traditional methods like cookies.
This paper gives an overview by examining the various fingerprinting techniques and analyzes the entropy and uniqueness of the collected data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T20:32:31Z) - Evaluating Robustness of Generative Search Engine on Adversarial Factual Questions [89.35345649303451]
Generative search engines have the potential to transform how people seek information online.
But generated responses from existing large language models (LLMs)-backed generative search engines may not always be accurate.
Retrieval-augmented generation exacerbates safety concerns, since adversaries may successfully evade the entire system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T11:22:19Z) - User Attitudes to Content Moderation in Web Search [49.1574468325115]
We examine the levels of support for different moderation practices applied to potentially misleading and/or potentially offensive content in web search.
We find that the most supported practice is informing users about potentially misleading or offensive content, and the least supported one is the complete removal of search results.
More conservative users and users with lower levels of trust in web search results are more likely to be against content moderation in web search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T10:57:15Z) - Understanding the Privacy Risks of Popular Search Engine Advertising
Systems [9.706547522469666]
We study the impact of clicking on search ads on three popular private search engines which have advertising-based business models: StartPage, Qwant, and DuckDuckGo.
We investigate the possibility of third parties tracking users when clicking on ads by analyzing first-party storage, redirection domain paths, and requests sent before, when, and after the clicks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-29T13:53:42Z) - Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem.
We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required.
Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z) - Exposing Query Identification for Search Transparency [69.06545074617685]
We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems.
We derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-14T20:19:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.