PhyBlock: A Progressive Benchmark for Physical Understanding and Planning via 3D Block Assembly

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08708v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:46:06 GMT
• Title: PhyBlock: A Progressive Benchmark for Physical Understanding and Planning via 3D Block Assembly
• Authors: Liang Ma, Jiajun Wen, Min Lin, Rongtao Xu, Xiwen Liang, Bingqian Lin, Jun Ma, Yongxin Wang, Ziming Wei, Haokun Lin, Mingfei Han, Meng Cao, Bokui Chen, Ivan Laptev, Xiaodan Liang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce PhyBlock, a progressive benchmark to assess vision-language models (VLMs) on physical understanding and planning.<n>PhyBlock integrates a novel four-level cognitive hierarchy assembly task alongside targeted Visual Question Answering (VQA) samples.<n>We benchmark 21 state-of-the-art VLMs, highlighting their strengths and limitations in physically grounded, multi-step planning.
• Score: 77.33429729761596
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated promising capabilities in reasoning and planning for embodied agents, their ability to comprehend physical phenomena, particularly within structured 3D environments, remains severely limited. To close this gap, we introduce PhyBlock, a progressive benchmark designed to assess VLMs on physical understanding and planning through robotic 3D block assembly tasks. PhyBlock integrates a novel four-level cognitive hierarchy assembly task alongside targeted Visual Question Answering (VQA) samples, collectively aimed at evaluating progressive spatial reasoning and fundamental physical comprehension, including object properties, spatial relationships, and holistic scene understanding. PhyBlock includes 2600 block tasks (400 assembly tasks, 2200 VQA tasks) and evaluates models across three key dimensions: partial completion, failure diagnosis, and planning robustness. We benchmark 21 state-of-the-art VLMs, highlighting their strengths and limitations in physically grounded, multi-step planning. Our empirical findings indicate that the performance of VLMs exhibits pronounced limitations in high-level planning and reasoning capabilities, leading to a notable decline in performance for the growing complexity of the tasks. Error analysis reveals persistent difficulties in spatial orientation and dependency reasoning. Surprisingly, chain-of-thought prompting offers minimal improvements, suggesting spatial tasks heavily rely on intuitive model comprehension. We position PhyBlock as a unified testbed to advance embodied reasoning, bridging vision-language understanding and real-world physical problem-solving.

Related papers

• DeepPHY: Benchmarking Agentic VLMs on Physical Reasoning [23.41054475390841]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) exhibit strong perceptual abilities and impressive visual reasoning.<n>They struggle with attention to detail and precise action planning in complex, dynamic environments.<n>DeepPHY is a novel benchmark framework designed to evaluate these capabilities in real-world scenarios.<n>Our evaluation finds that even state-of-the-art VLMs struggle to translate physical knowledge into precise, predictive control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T13:58:19Z)
• VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models [66.833085504228]
  We introduce V4DLM, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate visual language models (VLMs)<n>Our benchmark comprises diverse real-world and synthetic videos accompanied by carefully curated question-answer pairs.<n>We identify significant performance gaps compared to human baselines, highlighting fundamental deficiencies in existing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:06:06Z)
• Spatial Understanding from Videos: Structured Prompts Meet Simulation Data [79.52833996220059]
  We present a unified framework for enhancing 3D spatial reasoning in pre-trained vision-language models without modifying their architecture.<n>This framework combines SpatialMind, a structured prompting strategy that decomposes complex scenes and questions into interpretable reasoning steps, with ScanForgeQA, a scalable question-answering dataset built from diverse 3D simulation scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T07:36:33Z)
• Jigsaw-Puzzles: From Seeing to Understanding to Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [6.569837864665502]
  We introduce Jigsaw-Puzzles, a novel benchmark consisting of 1,100 carefully curated real-world images with high spatial complexity.<n>Based on this dataset, we design five tasks to rigorously evaluate vision-language models' spatial perception, structural understanding, and reasoning capabilities.<n>Results show that even the strongest model, Gemini-2.5-Pro, achieves only 77.14% overall accuracy and performs particularly poorly on the Order Generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T05:17:41Z)
• SpatialScore: Towards Unified Evaluation for Multimodal Spatial Understanding [64.15606979785355]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive success in question-answering tasks, yet their capabilities for spatial understanding are less explored.<n>This work investigates a critical question: do existing MLLMs possess 3D spatial perception and understanding abilities?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T17:59:03Z)
• Seeing is Believing: Belief-Space Planning with Foundation Models as Uncertainty Estimators [34.28879194786174]
  Generalizable robotic mobile manipulation in open-world environments poses significant challenges due to long horizons, complex goals, and partial observability.<n>A promising approach to address these challenges involves planning with a library of parameterized skills, where a task planner sequences these skills to achieve goals specified in structured languages.<n>This paper introduces a novel framework that leverages vision-language models to estimate uncertainty and facilitate symbolic grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T07:48:53Z)
• Beyond Semantics: Rediscovering Spatial Awareness in Vision-Language Models [10.792834356227118]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at identifying and describing objects but struggle with spatial reasoning.<n>Inspired by the dual-pathway (ventral-dorsal) model of human vision, we investigate why VLMs fail spatial tasks despite strong object recognition capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:51:14Z)
• iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMs [4.381263829108405]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are known to struggle with spatial reasoning and visual alignment.<n>We introduce iVISPAR, an interactive multi-modal benchmark designed to evaluate the spatial reasoning capabilities of VLMs acting as agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T14:29:01Z)
• VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMs [102.36953558562436]
  Vision language models (VLMs) are an exciting emerging class of language models (LMs) One understudied capability inVLMs is visual spatial planning. Our study introduces a benchmark that evaluates the spatial planning capability in these models in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T00:24:01Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.