Beyond Semantics: Rediscovering Spatial Awareness in Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17349v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:51:14 GMT
• Title: Beyond Semantics: Rediscovering Spatial Awareness in Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Jianing Qi, Jiawei Liu, Hao Tang, Zhigang Zhu,
• Abstract summary: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at identifying and describing objects but struggle with spatial reasoning.<n>Inspired by the dual-pathway (ventral-dorsal) model of human vision, we investigate why VLMs fail spatial tasks despite strong object recognition capabilities.
• Score: 10.792834356227118
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at identifying and describing objects but struggle with spatial reasoning such as accurately understanding the relative positions of objects. Inspired by the dual-pathway (ventral-dorsal) model of human vision, we investigate why VLMs fail spatial tasks despite strong object recognition capabilities. Our interpretability-driven analysis reveals a critical underlying cause: vision embeddings in VLMs are treated primarily as semantic ``bag-of-tokens," overshadowing subtle yet crucial positional cues due to their disproportionately large embedding norms. We validate this insight through extensive diagnostic experiments, demonstrating minimal performance impact when token orders or fine-grained spatial details are removed. Guided by these findings, we propose simple, interpretable interventions, including normalizing vision embedding norms and extracting mid-layer spatially rich features, to restore spatial awareness. Empirical results on both our synthetic data and standard benchmarks demonstrate improved spatial reasoning capabilities, highlighting the value of interpretability-informed design choices. Our study not only uncovers fundamental limitations in current VLM architectures but also provides actionable insights for enhancing structured perception of visual scenes.

Related papers

• VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models [66.833085504228]
  We introduce V4DLM, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate visual language models (VLMs)<n>Our benchmark comprises diverse real-world and synthetic videos accompanied by carefully curated question-answer pairs.<n>We identify significant performance gaps compared to human baselines, highlighting fundamental deficiencies in existing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:06:06Z)
• Response Wide Shut? Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities [54.94982467313341]
  Vision-language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general-purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems.<n>We set out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks by constructing a series of tests that probe which components of design, specifically, may be lacking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T15:26:41Z)
• Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Interwoven Thinking and Visual Drawing [62.447497430479174]
  Drawing to reason in space is a novel paradigm that enables LVLMs to reason through elementary drawing operations in the visual space.<n>Our model, named VILASR, consistently outperforms existing methods across diverse spatial reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T17:41:50Z)
• ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models [47.237216851265316]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and reasoning about visual content.<n>Current VLMs excel primarily at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective) but fail to generalize to allocentric viewpoints.<n>We introduce ViewSpatial-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for multi-viewpoint spatial localization recognition evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:59:26Z)
• Caption This, Reason That: VLMs Caught in the Middle [3.4820139118440676]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable progress in visual understanding in recent years.<n>They still lag behind human capabilities in specific visual tasks such as counting or relational reasoning.<n>We analyze VLM performance along core cognitive axes: Perception, Attention, and Memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T14:25:48Z)
• Unveiling the Lack of LVLM Robustness to Fundamental Visual Variations: Why and Path Forward [1.7971686967440696]
  V$2$R-Bench is a benchmark framework for evaluating Visual Variation Robustness of LVLMs.<n>We show that advanced models that excel at complex vision-language tasks significantly underperform on simple tasks such as object recognition.<n>These vulnerabilities stem from error accumulation in the pipeline architecture and inadequate multimodal alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T14:01:32Z)
• A Call for New Recipes to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs [85.67171333213301]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in general vision-language tasks. Recent studies have exposed critical limitations in their spatial reasoning capabilities. This deficiency in spatial reasoning significantly constrains MLLMs' ability to interact effectively with the physical world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:48:39Z)
• Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
  We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning. We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z)
• Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas [52.478956204238315]
  We study the spatial reasoning challenge from the lens of mechanistic interpretability.<n>We observe that successful spatial reasoning correlates strongly with the model's ability to align its attention with actual object locations.<n>Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:57:03Z)
• SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical Evaluation [7.659514491338669]
  Current vision-language models may grasp basic spatial cues but struggle with the multi-dimensional spatial reasoning necessary for human-like understanding and real-world applications.<n>We develop SPHERE, a hierarchical evaluation framework supported by a new human-annotated dataset.<n> Benchmark evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals significant deficiencies, especially in reasoning about distance and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T09:10:55Z)
• Beyond Sight: Towards Cognitive Alignment in LVLM via Enriched Visual Knowledge [24.538839144639653]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) integrate separately pre-trained vision and language components. These models frequently encounter a core issue of "cognitive misalignment" between the vision encoder (VE) and the large language model (LLM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T18:33:14Z)
• Sparkle: Mastering Basic Spatial Capabilities in Vision Language Models Elicits Generalization to Spatial Reasoning [19.399925987942204]
  Vision language models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of downstream tasks.<n>Most tasks rely on the core spatial reasoning capabilities in two-dimensional (2D) environments.<n>We introduce Sparkle: a framework that uses synthetic data generation to provide targeted supervision for vision language models (VLMs) in three basic spatial capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T16:26:09Z)
• Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models [61.899791071654654]
  We introduce a benchmark, Q-Spatial Bench, with 271 questions across five categories designed for quantitative spatial reasoning. We investigate the performance of state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) on this task. We develop a zero-shot prompting technique, SpatialPrompt, that encourages VLMs to answer quantitative spatial questions using reference objects as visual cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T16:45:42Z)
• VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMs [102.36953558562436]
  Vision language models (VLMs) are an exciting emerging class of language models (LMs) One understudied capability inVLMs is visual spatial planning. Our study introduces a benchmark that evaluates the spatial planning capability in these models in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T00:24:01Z)
• VALOR-EVAL: Holistic Coverage and Faithfulness Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models [57.43276586087863]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination issues, wherein the models generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect outputs. Existing benchmarks are often limited in scope, focusing mainly on object hallucinations. We introduce a multi-dimensional benchmark covering objects, attributes, and relations, with challenging images selected based on associative biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T04:49:22Z)
• Hierarchical Invariance for Robust and Interpretable Vision Tasks at Larger Scales [54.78115855552886]
  We show how to construct over-complete invariants with a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)-like hierarchical architecture. With the over-completeness, discriminative features w.r.t. the task can be adaptively formed in a Neural Architecture Search (NAS)-like manner. For robust and interpretable vision tasks at larger scales, hierarchical invariant representation can be considered as an effective alternative to traditional CNN and invariants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T16:50:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.