Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09853v3
• Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:01:55 GMT
• Title: Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
• Abstract summary: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting plays an indispensable role in endowing large language models (LLMs) with complex reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose a causal framework that characterizes CoT reasoning through the dual lenses of sufficiency and necessity.
• Score: 22.885363238296858
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting plays an indispensable role in endowing large language models (LLMs) with complex reasoning capabilities. However, CoT currently faces two fundamental challenges: (1) Sufficiency, which ensures that the generated intermediate inference steps comprehensively cover and substantiate the final conclusion; and (2) Necessity, which identifies the inference steps that are truly indispensable for the soundness of the resulting answer. We propose a causal framework that characterizes CoT reasoning through the dual lenses of sufficiency and necessity. Incorporating causal Probability of Sufficiency and Necessity allows us not only to determine which steps are logically sufficient or necessary to the prediction outcome, but also to quantify their actual influence on the final reasoning outcome under different intervention scenarios, thereby enabling the automated addition of missing steps and the pruning of redundant ones. Extensive experimental results on various mathematical and commonsense reasoning benchmarks confirm substantial improvements in reasoning efficiency and reduced token usage without sacrificing accuracy. Our work provides a promising direction for improving LLM reasoning performance and cost-effectiveness.

Related papers

• SuCo: Sufficiency-guided Continuous Adaptive Reasoning [59.17222918775686]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often generate excessively long Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT)<n>Existing efforts to mitigate this inefficiency typically rely on discrete reasoning modes or fixed budget tiers.<n>We introduce Minimal Sufficient CoT (MSC), defined as the shortest prefix of a CoT trajectory which is adequate for producing the correct answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T08:52:15Z)
• Unlocking Fine-Grained Translation Quality Estimation in LRMs through Synergistically Evolving Implicit and Explicit Reasoning [40.63257408300584]
  RIEQE (Reasoning both Implicitly and Explicitly for QE) is a two-stage training framework that enables the co-evolution of implicit and explicit reasoning capabilities.<n>Results demonstrate that implicit and explicit reasoning co-evolve under our framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T14:47:49Z)
• When Is Thinking Enough? Early Exit via Sufficiency Assessment for Efficient Reasoning [52.21239821135325]
  We introduce Dynamic Thought Sufficiency in Reasoning (DTSR), a novel framework for efficient reasoning.<n>Inspired by human metacognition, DTSR operates in two stages: Reflection Signal Monitoring, and Thought Sufficiency Check.<n>DTSR reduces reasoning length by 28.9%-34.9% with minimal performance loss, effectively mitigating overthinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T07:56:28Z)
• CoTJudger: A Graph-Driven Framework for Automatic Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought Efficiency and Redundancy in LRMs [46.51345659234088]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance by producing extended Chain-of-Thought traces before answering.<n>Existing evaluations largely emphasize final accuracy or coarse token counts, and lack automated tools to separate essential logic from structural redundancy.<n>We introduce CoTJudger, a graph-driven framework that quantifies reasoning efficiency by converting free-form CoTs into directed dependency graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T07:18:58Z)
• Effective Reasoning Chains Reduce Intrinsic Dimensionality [53.24264007741698]
  Intrinsic dimensionality is a measure of the minimum number of model dimensions needed to reach a given accuracy threshold.<n>We show that effective reasoning strategies consistently reduce the intrinsic dimensionality of the task.<n>Our findings suggest that effective reasoning chains facilitate learning by better compressing the task using fewer parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T23:32:12Z)
• Capabilities and Fundamental Limits of Latent Chain-of-Thought [9.586079816543178]
  Latent Chain-of-Thought (Latent CoT) models promise efficient reasoning via continuous representations, yet exhibit puzzling performance inconsistencies.<n>We reveal that this trade-off is governed by decisional certainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T10:46:00Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Reasoning: From Single-Model to Multi-Agent Paradigms [20.241519889633285]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as reasoning systems, where reasoning paradigms play a critical role.<n>We conduct a comprehensive and unified evaluation of reasoning paradigms, spanning direct single-model generation, CoT-augmented single-model reasoning, and representative MAS.<n>We introduce MIMeBench, a new open-ended benchmark that targets two foundational yet underexplored semantic capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T17:23:45Z)
• Structured Reasoning for Large Language Models [59.215789462977206]
  We propose Structured Reasoning (SCR), a framework that decouples reasoning trajectories into explicit, evaluable, and trainable components.<n>SCR substantially improves reasoning efficiency and self-verification.<n>Compared with existing reasoning paradigms, it reduces output token length by up to 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T04:04:01Z)
• Adaptive Termination for Multi-round Parallel Reasoning: An Universal Semantic Entropy-Guided Framework [12.361554676966552]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated progress toward artificial general intelligence.<n>We aim to design a flexible test-time collaborative inference framework that exploits the complementary strengths of both sequential and parallel reasoning paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T13:28:35Z)
• Lost at the Beginning of Reasoning [82.18834329384514]
  We show that the first reasoning step exerts a disproportionately large influence on the final prediction.<n>We propose an efficient sampling strategy that leverages a reward model to identify and retain high-quality first reasoning steps.<n>We introduce a new benchmark specifically constructed with deliberately flawed first reasoning steps to systematically evaluate model self-correction capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T09:53:57Z)
• ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning [75.1101108949743]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) perform strongly in complex reasoning tasks via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting.<n>LRMs often suffer from verbose outputs caused by redundant content, increasing computational overhead, and degrading user experience.<n>We propose ConCISE, a framework that simplifies reasoning chains by reinforcing the model's confidence during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T01:40:40Z)
• Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models [51.85792055455284]
  Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks.<n>System 1 reasoning is computationally efficient but leads to suboptimal performance.<n>System 2 reasoning often incurs substantial computational costs due to its slow thinking nature and inefficient or unnecessary reasoning behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:58:07Z)
• Efficient Inference for Large Reasoning Models: A Survey [42.61170621552432]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) significantly improve the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) by learning to reason.<n>However, their deliberative reasoning process leads to inefficiencies in token usage, memory consumption, and inference time.<n>This survey provides a review of efficient inference methods designed specifically for LRMs, focusing on mitigating token inefficiency while preserving the reasoning quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T13:27:46Z)
• Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models [54.04678363287392]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex tasks.<n>Recent advancements in OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have further improved performance in System-2 reasoning domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T17:59:38Z)
• Stepwise Perplexity-Guided Refinement for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [56.37421741507468]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly enhanced the performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose a method to identify critical reasoning steps using perplexity as a measure of their importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T20:04:51Z)
• Rethinking Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Training [10.722453877596998]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as an effective approach for activating latent capabilities in LLMs.<n>We propose a novel CoT framework to improve reasoning performance.<n>Our framework integrates two key components: (i) a task-specific prompt module that optimize the initial reasoning process, and (ii) an adaptive reasoning module that dynamically refines the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-14T13:12:50Z)
• CSCE: Boosting LLM Reasoning by Simultaneous Enhancing of Causal Significance and Consistency [11.144164626192904]
  Chain-based methods like chain of thought (CoT) play a rising role in solving reasoning tasks for large language models (LLMs)<n>This paper proposes a non-chain-based reasoning framework for simultaneous consideration of causal significance and consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T08:28:23Z)
• Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters [82.84696222087396]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can dramatically improve the multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) We show that CoT reasoning is possible even with invalid demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T05:20:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.