Adaptive Termination for Multi-round Parallel Reasoning: An Universal Semantic Entropy-Guided Framework
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06829v1
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 13:28:35 GMT
- Title: Adaptive Termination for Multi-round Parallel Reasoning: An Universal Semantic Entropy-Guided Framework
- Abstract summary: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated progress toward artificial general intelligence.<n>We aim to design a flexible test-time collaborative inference framework that exploits the complementary strengths of both sequential and parallel reasoning paradigms.
- Score: 12.361554676966552
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated progress toward artificial general intelligence, with inference-time scaling emerging as a key technique. Contemporary approaches leverage either sequential reasoning (iteratively extending chains of thought) or parallel reasoning (generating multiple solutions simultaneously) to scale inference. However, both paradigms face fundamental limitations: sequential scaling typically relies on arbitrary token budgets for termination, leading to inefficiency or premature cutoff; while parallel scaling often lacks coordination among parallel branches and requires intrusive fine-tuning to perform effectively. In light of these challenges, we aim to design a flexible test-time collaborative inference framework that exploits the complementary strengths of both sequential and parallel reasoning paradigms. Towards this goal, the core challenge lies in developing an efficient and accurate intrinsic quality metric to assess model responses during collaborative inference, enabling dynamic control and early termination of the reasoning trace. To address this challenge, we introduce semantic entropy (SE), which quantifies the semantic diversity of parallel model responses and serves as a robust indicator of reasoning quality due to its strong negative correlation with accuracy...
Related papers
- Variational-Ising-Attention (VIA):TailoredAttentionMattersfor Science [3.744103474408833]
We propose Variational-Ising-Attention, which augments softmax normalization with an interacting Ising model.<n>Experiments show that VIA consistently and substantially outperforms standard softmax attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-26T12:44:36Z) - RuPLaR : Efficient Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning Chains with Rule-Based Priors From Multi-Step to One-Step [7.647393987025467]
We introduce One-Model One-Step, a novel compression framework for Latent Reasoning with Rule-Based Priors.<n>Our method trains an LLM to autonomously generate latent reasoning tokens in a single training stage.<n>Experiments show that our framework improves accuracy by 11.1% over existing latent CoT methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T05:55:07Z) - Early Decisions Matter: Proximity Bias and Initial Trajectory Shaping in Non-Autoregressive Diffusion Language Models [54.16797570104461]
Diffusion-based language models (dLLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive language models.<n>We investigate non-autoregressive decoding in dLLMs by systematically analyzing its inference dynamics along the temporal axis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-12T10:26:41Z) - DiSCTT: Consensus-Guided Self-Curriculum for Efficient Test-Time Adaptation in Reasoning [0.5371337604556311]
TestTT is a difficulty-aware, consensus-guided self-curriculum framework that allocates test-time optimization strategies.<n>We show that TestTT consistently outperforms strong computation baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T16:38:50Z) - Anti-Length Shift: Dynamic Outlier Truncation for Training Efficient Reasoning Models [29.56923793047279]
We introduce Dynamic Outlier Truncation (DOT), a training-time intervention that selectively suppresses redundant tokens.<n>DOT targets only the extreme tail of response lengths within fully correct rollout groups while preserving long-horizon reasoning capabilities.<n>Our method reduces inference token usage by 78% while simultaneously increasing accuracy compared to the initial policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T14:31:07Z) - Arbitrage: Efficient Reasoning via Advantage-Aware Speculation [71.45710345765528]
Speculative Decoding accelerates inference by employing a fast but inaccurate draft model to autoregressively propose tokens.<n>But due to unnecessary rejections caused by token mismatches in semantically equivalent steps, traditional token-level Speculative Decoding struggles in reasoning tasks.<n>We propose Arbitrage, a novel step-level speculative generation framework that routes generation dynamically based on the relative advantage between draft and target models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-04T17:50:53Z) - ThreadWeaver: Adaptive Threading for Efficient Parallel Reasoning in Language Models [99.6720868215076]
We introduce ThreadWeaver, a framework for adaptive parallel reasoning.<n> ThreadWeaver achieves accuracy on par with popular sequential reasoning models of comparable size.<n>We show that ThreadWeaver delivers up to 1.53x average speedup in token latency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-24T18:55:59Z) - SpiralThinker: Latent Reasoning through an Iterative Process with Text-Latent Interleaving [4.732347368043908]
SpiralThinker is a unified framework that performs iterative updates over latent representations.<n>A progressive alignment objective combined with structured annotations maintains coherence between latent and textual reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T05:05:42Z) - A Survey on Parallel Reasoning [58.66122129692264]
We first present a formal definition of parallel reasoning and clarify its distinction from related concepts like Chain-of-Thought.<n>We then organize and discuss advanced techniques based on a novel taxonomy, including non-interactive reasoning, interactive reasoning, and efficiency-focused decoding strategies.<n>We highlight the core challenges of parallel reasoning and suggest potential directions for future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-14T05:42:19Z) - ConciseHint: Boosting Efficient Reasoning via Continuous Concise Hints during Generation [53.149817480019834]
Recent advancements in large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved notable performance enhancements on complex reasoning tasks by scaling up the generation length by Chain-of-Thought (CoT)<n>We propose a framework dubbed ConciseHint, which continuously encourages the reasoning model to speak concisely by injecting the textual hint during the token generation of the reasoning process.<n>Experiments on the state-of-the-art LRMs, including DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen-3 series, demonstrate that our method can effectively produce concise reasoning processes while maintaining performance well.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T16:20:44Z) - AdapThink: Adaptive Thinking Preferences for Reasoning Language Model [32.47427081297578]
Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based post-training has significantly advanced the complex reasoning capabilities of language models.<n>However, this slow thinking'' paradigm presents a critical challenge to reasoning efficiency.<n>We propose AdapThink, an adaptive post-training framework designed to induce more efficient thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T02:06:04Z) - Fractional Reasoning via Latent Steering Vectors Improves Inference Time Compute [57.16286134405821]
We propose Fractional Reasoning, a framework that enables continuous control over reasoning intensity at inference time.<n>Our method operates by extracting the latent steering vector associated with deeper reasoning and reapplying it with a tunable scaling factor.<n> Experiments on GSM8K, MATH500, and GPQA demonstrate that Fractional Reasoning consistently improves performance across diverse reasoning tasks and models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T21:15:59Z) - Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [20.901961243513835]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting plays an indispensable role in endowing large language models (LLMs) with complex reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose a causal framework that characterizes CoT reasoning through the dual lenses of sufficiency and necessity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-11T15:22:09Z) - Neural Network Reprogrammability: A Unified Theme on Model Reprogramming, Prompt Tuning, and Prompt Instruction [55.914891182214475]
We introduce neural network reprogrammability as a unifying framework for model adaptation.<n>We present a taxonomy that categorizes such information manipulation approaches across four key dimensions.<n>We also analyze remaining technical challenges and ethical considerations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T05:42:27Z) - Inference Acceleration of Autoregressive Normalizing Flows by Selective Jacobi Decoding [12.338918067455436]
Normalizing flows are promising generative models with advantages such as theoretical rigor, analytical log-likelihood, and end-to-end training.<n>Recent advancements utilize autoregressive modeling, significantly enhancing expressive power and generation quality.<n>We propose a selective Jacobi decoding (SeJD) strategy that accelerates autoregressive inference through parallel iterative optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T16:53:15Z) - PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning [70.32510083790069]
PixelThink is a simple yet effective scheme that integrates externally estimated task difficulty and internally measured model uncertainty.<n>It learns to compress reasoning length in accordance with scene complexity and predictive confidence.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves both reasoning efficiency and overall segmentation performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T17:55:49Z) - a1: Steep Test-time Scaling Law via Environment Augmented Generation [45.19240207975418]
Environment Augmented Generation (EAG) is a framework that enhances large language models' reasoning through real-time environmental feedback.<n>EAG enables deliberate backtracking and strategic replanning through tight integration of execution feedback and branching exploration.<n>A1-32B model achieves state-of-the-art performance among similar-sized models across all benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-20T12:55:59Z) - Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage.<n>Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes.<n> causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z) - Rethinking Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Training [10.722453877596998]
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as an effective approach for activating latent capabilities in LLMs.<n>We propose a novel CoT framework to improve reasoning performance.<n>Our framework integrates two key components: (i) a task-specific prompt module that optimize the initial reasoning process, and (ii) an adaptive reasoning module that dynamically refines the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-14T13:12:50Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.