Attention Head Embeddings with Trainable Deep Kernels for Hallucination Detection in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09886v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:59:15 GMT
• Title: Attention Head Embeddings with Trainable Deep Kernels for Hallucination Detection in LLMs
• Authors: Rodion Oblovatny, Alexandra Bazarova, Alexey Zaytsev,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel approach for detecting hallucinations in large language models.<n>We find that hallucinated responses exhibit smaller deviations from their prompts compared to grounded responses.<n>We propose a model-intrinsic detection method that uses distributional distances as principled hallucination scores.
• Score: 47.18623962083962
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a novel approach for detecting hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) by analyzing the probabilistic divergence between prompt and response hidden-state distributions. Counterintuitively, we find that hallucinated responses exhibit smaller deviations from their prompts compared to grounded responses, suggesting that hallucinations often arise from superficial rephrasing rather than substantive reasoning. Leveraging this insight, we propose a model-intrinsic detection method that uses distributional distances as principled hallucination scores, eliminating the need for external knowledge or auxiliary models. To enhance sensitivity, we employ deep learnable kernels that automatically adapt to capture nuanced geometric differences between distributions. Our approach outperforms existing baselines, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks. The method remains competitive even without kernel training, offering a robust, scalable solution for hallucination detection.

Related papers

• Counterfactual Probing for Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Large Language Models [0.0]
  We propose Counterfactual Probing, a novel approach for detecting and mitigating hallucinations in large language models.<n>Our method dynamically generates counterfactual statements that appear plausible but contain subtle factual errors, then evaluates the model's sensitivity to these perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T17:29:48Z)
• ICR Probe: Tracking Hidden State Dynamics for Reliable Hallucination Detection in LLMs [50.18087419133284]
  hallucination detection methods leveraging hidden states predominantly focus on static and isolated representations.<n>We introduce a novel metric, the ICR Score, which quantifies the contribution of modules to the hidden states' update.<n>We propose a hallucination detection method, the ICR Probe, which captures the cross-layer evolution of hidden states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T11:44:26Z)
• Shaking to Reveal: Perturbation-Based Detection of LLM Hallucinations [25.18901449626428]
  A widely adopted strategy to detect hallucination, known as self-assessment, relies on the model's own output confidence to estimate the factual accuracy of its answers.<n>We propose Sample-Specific Prompting (SSP), a new framework that improves self-assessment by analyzing perturbation sensitivity at intermediate representations.<n>SSP significantly outperforms prior methods across a range of hallucination detection benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:44:28Z)
• MIRAGE: Assessing Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Chains of MLLM [58.2298313720146]
  Multimodal hallucinations are multi-sourced and arise from diverse causes.<n>Existing benchmarks fail to adequately distinguish between perception-induced hallucinations and reasoning-induced hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T05:54:36Z)
• Learning Auxiliary Tasks Improves Reference-Free Hallucination Detection in Open-Domain Long-Form Generation [78.78421340836915]
  We systematically investigate reference-free hallucination detection in open-domain long-form responses.<n>Our findings reveal that internal states are insufficient for reliably distinguishing between factual and hallucinated content.<n>We introduce a new paradigm, named RATE-FT, that augments fine-tuning with an auxiliary task for the model to jointly learn with the main task of hallucination detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T07:10:03Z)
• Why and How LLMs Hallucinate: Connecting the Dots with Subsequence Associations [82.42811602081692]
  This paper introduces a subsequence association framework to systematically trace and understand hallucinations.<n>Key insight is hallucinations that arise when dominant hallucinatory associations outweigh faithful ones.<n>We propose a tracing algorithm that identifies causal subsequences by analyzing hallucination probabilities across randomized input contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T06:34:45Z)
• Efficient Contrastive Decoding with Probabilistic Hallucination Detection - Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models - [1.2499537119440245]
  Efficient Contrastive Decoding (ECD) is a simple method that leverages probabilistic hallucination detection to shift the output distribution towards contextually accurate answers at inference time.<n>Our experiments show that ECD effectively mitigates hallucinations, outperforming state-of-the-art methods with respect to performance on LVLM benchmarks and computation time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T14:50:25Z)
• Robust Hallucination Detection in LLMs via Adaptive Token Selection [25.21763722332831]
  Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) pose significant safety concerns that impede their broader deployment.<n>We propose HaMI, a novel approach that enables robust detection of hallucinations through adaptive selection and learning of critical tokens.<n>We achieve this robustness by an innovative formulation of the Hallucination detection task as Multiple Instance (HaMI) learning over token-level representations within a sequence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T15:39:10Z)
• Enhancing Hallucination Detection through Noise Injection [9.582929634879932]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are prone to generating plausible yet incorrect responses, known as hallucinations.<n>We show that detection can be improved significantly by taking into account model uncertainty in the Bayesian sense.<n>We propose a very simple and efficient approach that perturbs an appropriate subset of model parameters, or equivalently hidden unit activations, during sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T06:02:20Z)
• Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback [40.930238150365795]
  We propose detecting and mitigating hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) via fine-grained AI feedback.<n>We generate a small-size hallucination annotation dataset by proprietary models.<n>Then, we propose a detect-then-rewrite pipeline to automatically construct preference dataset for training hallucination mitigating model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T14:46:10Z)
• AutoHall: Automated Hallucination Dataset Generation for Large Language Models [56.92068213969036]
  This paper introduces a method for automatically constructing model-specific hallucination datasets based on existing fact-checking datasets called AutoHall. We also propose a zero-resource and black-box hallucination detection method based on self-contradiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T05:20:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.