Model Discovery and Graph Simulation: A Lightweight Gateway to Chaos Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11176v2
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 13:34:13 GMT
• Title: Model Discovery and Graph Simulation: A Lightweight Gateway to Chaos Engineering
• Authors: Anatoly A. Krasnovsky,
• Abstract summary: Chaos engineering reveals resilience risks but is expensive and operationally risky to run broadly and often.<n>We claim that a simple connectivity-only topological model can provide fast, low-risk availability estimates under fail-stop faults.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Chaos engineering reveals resilience risks but is expensive and operationally risky to run broadly and often. Model-based analyses can estimate dependability, yet in practice they are tricky to build and keep current because models are typically handcrafted. We claim that a simple connectivity-only topological model - just the service-dependency graph plus replica counts - can provide fast, low-risk availability estimates under fail-stop faults. To make this claim practical without hand-built models, we introduce model discovery: an automated step that can run in CI/CD or as an observability-platform capability, synthesizing an explicit, analyzable model from artifacts teams already have (e.g., distributed traces, service-mesh telemetry, configs/manifests) - providing an accessible gateway for teams to begin resilience testing. As a proof by instance on the DeathStarBench Social Network, we extract the dependency graph from Jaeger and estimate availability across two deployment modes and five failure rates. The discovered model closely tracks live fault-injection results; with replication, median error at mid-range failure rates is near zero, while no-replication shows signed biases consistent with excluded mechanisms. These results create two opportunities: first, to triage and reduce the scope of expensive chaos experiments in advance, and second, to generate real-time signals on the system's resilience posture as its topology evolves, preserving live validation for the most critical or ambiguous scenarios.

Related papers

• ProbeLLM: Automating Principled Diagnosis of LLM Failures [89.44131968886184]
  We propose ProbeLLM, a benchmark-agnostic automated probing framework that elevates weakness discovery from individual failures to structured failure modes.<n>By restricting probing to verifiable test cases and leveraging tool-augmented generation and verification, ProbeLLM grounds failure discovery in reliable evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T14:33:13Z)
• Towards Causal Market Simulators [0.0]
  We propose a Time-series Neural Causal Model VAE that combines variational autoencoders with structural causal models to generate counterfactual financial time series.<n>Our approach enforces causal constraints through directed acyclic graphs in the decoder architecture and employs the causal Wasserstein distance for training.<n>The model enables financial stress testing, scenario analysis, and enhanced backtesting by generating plausible counterfactual market trajectories that respect underlying causal mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T15:44:07Z)
• Failure Prediction at Runtime for Generative Robot Policies [6.375597233389154]
  Early failure prediction during runtime is essential for deploying robots in human-centered and safety-critical environments.<n>We propose FIPER, a framework for failure prediction for generative robot policies that does not require failure data.<n>Our results demonstrate that FIPER better distinguishes actual failures from benign OOD situations and predicts failures more accurately and earlier than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T15:09:27Z)
• ResAD: Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling for End-to-End Autonomous Driving [64.42138266293202]
  ResAD is a Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling framework.<n>It reframes the learning task to predict the residual deviation from an inertial reference.<n>On the NAVSIM benchmark, ResAD achieves a state-of-the-art PDMS of 88.6 using a vanilla diffusion policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:59:36Z)
• Retrieval Augmented Anomaly Detection (RAAD): Nimble Model Adjustment Without Retraining [3.037546128667634]
  We introduce Retrieval Augmented Anomaly Detection, a novel method taking inspiration from Retrieval Augmented Generation.<n>Human annotated examples are sent to a vector store, which can modify model outputs on the very next processed batch for model inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T20:17:16Z)
• Calibrating Deep Neural Network using Euclidean Distance [5.3612053942581275]
  In machine learning, Focal Loss is commonly used to reduce misclassification rates by emphasizing hard-to-classify samples.<n>High calibration error indicates a misalignment between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes, affecting model reliability.<n>This research introduces a novel loss function called Focal Loss (FCL), designed to improve probability calibration while retaining the advantages of Focal Loss in handling difficult samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T23:06:50Z)
• A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks [1.622320874892682]
  We propose using accelerated failure time models to measure the effect of hardware choice, batch size, number of epochs, and test-set accuracy. We evaluate several GPU types and use the Tree Parzen Estimator to maximize model robustness and minimize model run-time simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T20:43:59Z)
• Real-Time Anomaly Detection and Reactive Planning with Large Language Models [18.57162998677491]
  Foundation models, e.g., large language models (LLMs), trained on internet-scale data possess zero-shot capabilities. We present a two-stage reasoning framework that incorporates the judgement regarding potential anomalies into a safe control framework. This enables our monitor to improve the trustworthiness of dynamic robotic systems, such as quadrotors or autonomous vehicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T17:59:22Z)
• Root Causing Prediction Anomalies Using Explainable AI [3.970146574042422]
  We present a novel application of explainable AI (XAI) for root-causing performance degradation in machine learning models. A single feature corruption can cause cascading feature, label and concept drifts. We have successfully applied this technique to improve the reliability of models used in personalized advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T19:38:50Z)
• Model Collapse Demystified: The Case of Regression [12.115359951879462]
  We study the phenomenon of "model collapse" in the era of proliferation of large language and image generation models. We obtain analytic formulae which quantitatively outline this phenomenon in a broad range of regimes. We propose a simple strategy based on adaptive regularization to mitigate model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T15:26:01Z)
• A Pseudo-Semantic Loss for Autoregressive Models with Logical Constraints [87.08677547257733]
  Neuro-symbolic AI bridges the gap between purely symbolic and neural approaches to learning. We show how to maximize the likelihood of a symbolic constraint w.r.t the neural network's output distribution. We also evaluate our approach on Sudoku and shortest-path prediction cast as autoregressive generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T20:58:07Z)
• Graph Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Controllable Data Augmentation [51.17476258673232]
  Graph Neural Network (GNN) has demonstrated extraordinary performance in classifying graph properties. Due to the selection bias of training and testing data, distribution deviation is widespread. We propose OOD calibration to measure the distribution deviation of virtual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T13:10:27Z)
• A Graph-Enhanced Click Model for Web Search [67.27218481132185]
  We propose a novel graph-enhanced click model (GraphCM) for web search. We exploit both intra-session and inter-session information for the sparsity and cold-start problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T08:32:43Z)
• Tracking the risk of a deployed model and detecting harmful distribution shifts [105.27463615756733]
  In practice, it may make sense to ignore benign shifts, under which the performance of a deployed model does not degrade substantially. We argue that a sensible method for firing off a warning has to both (a) detect harmful shifts while ignoring benign ones, and (b) allow continuous monitoring of model performance without increasing the false alarm rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T17:21:41Z)
• Contextual Dropout: An Efficient Sample-Dependent Dropout Module [60.63525456640462]
  Dropout has been demonstrated as a simple and effective module to regularize the training process of deep neural networks. We propose contextual dropout with an efficient structural design as a simple and scalable sample-dependent dropout module. Our experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms baseline methods in terms of both accuracy and quality of uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-06T19:30:32Z)
• Anomaly Detection of Time Series with Smoothness-Inducing Sequential Variational Auto-Encoder [59.69303945834122]
  We present a Smoothness-Inducing Sequential Variational Auto-Encoder (SISVAE) model for robust estimation and anomaly detection of time series. Our model parameterizes mean and variance for each time-stamp with flexible neural networks. We show the effectiveness of our model on both synthetic datasets and public real-world benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-02T06:15:15Z)
• Firearm Detection via Convolutional Neural Networks: Comparing a Semantic Segmentation Model Against End-to-End Solutions [68.8204255655161]
  Threat detection of weapons and aggressive behavior from live video can be used for rapid detection and prevention of potentially deadly incidents. One way for achieving this is through the use of artificial intelligence and, in particular, machine learning for image analysis. We compare a traditional monolithic end-to-end deep learning model and a previously proposed model based on an ensemble of simpler neural networks detecting fire-weapons via semantic segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T15:19:29Z)
• Know Where To Drop Your Weights: Towards Faster Uncertainty Estimation [7.605814048051737]
  Estimating uncertainty of models used in low-latency applications is a challenge due to the computationally demanding nature of uncertainty estimation techniques. We propose Select-DC which uses a subset of layers in a neural network to model uncertainty with MCDC. We show a significant reduction in the GFLOPS required to model uncertainty, compared to Monte Carlo DropConnect, with marginal trade-off in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T02:56:27Z)
• Model-based Policy Optimization with Unsupervised Model Adaptation [37.09948645461043]
  We investigate how to bridge the gap between real and simulated data due to inaccurate model estimation for better policy optimization. We propose a novel model-based reinforcement learning framework AMPO, which introduces unsupervised model adaptation. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of sample efficiency on a range of continuous control benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T14:19:42Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replication [102.92137353938388]
  We study a replication of the ImageNet dataset on which models exhibit a significant (11-14%) drop in accuracy. After correcting for the identified statistical bias, only an estimated $3.6% pm 1.5%$ of the original $11.7% pm 1.0%$ accuracy drop remains unaccounted for.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-19T17:48:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.