Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators: A Simulation Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14019v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 21:35:14 GMT
• Title: Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators: A Simulation Approach
• Authors: Jesse Zhou, Geoffrey T. Wodtke,
• Abstract summary: Analyses of causal mediation often involve exposure-induced confounders or, relatedly, multiple mediators.<n>This study introduces a general approach to estimating all these quantities by simulating potential outcomes from a series of distribution models for each mediator and the outcome.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Analyses of causal mediation often involve exposure-induced confounders or, relatedly, multiple mediators. In such applications, researchers aim to estimate a variety of different quantities, including interventional direct and indirect effects, multivariate natural direct and indirect effects, and/or path-specific effects. This study introduces a general approach to estimating all these quantities by simulating potential outcomes from a series of distribution models for each mediator and the outcome. Building on similar methods developed for analyses with only a single mediator (Imai et al. 2010), we first outline how to implement this approach with parametric models. The parametric implementation can accommodate linear and nonlinear relationships, both continuous and discrete mediators, and many different types of outcomes. However, it depends on correct specification of each model used to simulate the potential outcomes. To address the risk of misspecification, we also introduce an alternative implementation using a novel class of nonparametric models, which leverage deep neural networks to approximate the relevant distributions without relying on strict assumptions about functional form. We illustrate both methods by reanalyzing the effects of media framing on attitudes toward immigration (Brader et al. 2008) and the effects of prenatal care on preterm birth (VanderWeele et al. 2014).

Related papers

• Simulation-based inference for stochastic nonlinear mixed-effects models with applications in systems biology [0.29998889086656577]
  We propose a novel methodology for scalable Bayesian inference in hierarchical mixed-effects models.<n>Our framework first constructs amortized approximations of the likelihood and the posterior distribution, which are then rapidly refined for each individual dataset.<n>Our approach proved to be both fast and competitive in terms of statistical accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T15:18:58Z)
• Identifiable Multi-View Causal Discovery Without Non-Gaussianity [63.217175519436125]
  We propose a novel approach to linear causal discovery in the framework of multi-view Structural Equation Models (SEM)<n>We prove the identifiability of all the parameters of the model without any further assumptions on the structure of the SEM other than it being acyclic.<n>The proposed methodology is validated through simulations and application on real data, where it enables the estimation of causal graphs between brain regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T14:06:14Z)
• Federated Causal Inference: Multi-Study ATE Estimation beyond Meta-Analysis [12.896319628045967]
  We study Federated Causal Inference, an approach to estimate treatment effects from decentralized data across centers.<n>We compare three classes of Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimators derived from the Plug-in G-Formula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T10:19:17Z)
• Generative vs. Discriminative modeling under the lens of uncertainty quantification [0.929965561686354]
  In this paper, we undertake a comparative analysis of generative and discriminative approaches. We compare the ability of both approaches to leverage information from various sources in an uncertainty aware inference. We propose a general sampling scheme enabling supervised learning for both approaches, as well as semi-supervised learning when compatible with the considered modeling approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:32:43Z)
• Quantifying & Modeling Multimodal Interactions: An Information Decomposition Framework [89.8609061423685]
  We propose an information-theoretic approach to quantify the degree of redundancy, uniqueness, and synergy relating input modalities with an output task. To validate PID estimation, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic datasets where the PID is known and on large-scale multimodal benchmarks. We demonstrate their usefulness in (1) quantifying interactions within multimodal datasets, (2) quantifying interactions captured by multimodal models, (3) principled approaches for model selection, and (4) three real-world case studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:59:05Z)
• Disentangled Representation for Causal Mediation Analysis [25.114619307838602]
  Causal mediation analysis is a method that is often used to reveal direct and indirect effects. Deep learning shows promise in mediation analysis, but the current methods only assume latent confounders that affect treatment, mediator and outcome simultaneously. We propose the Disentangled Mediation Analysis Variational AutoEncoder (DMAVAE), which disentangles the representations of latent confounders into three types to accurately estimate the natural direct effect, natural indirect effect and total effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T23:37:17Z)
• Bayesian Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction Models using Tensor Regression for Multi-environmental Trials [0.0]
  We propose a Bayesian tensor regression model to accommodate the effect of multiple factors on phenotype prediction. We adopt a set of prior distributions that resolve identifiability issues that may arise between the parameters in the model. We explore the applicability of our model by analysing real-world data related to wheat production across Ireland from 2010 to 2019.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T19:54:50Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• MINIMALIST: Mutual INformatIon Maximization for Amortized Likelihood Inference from Sampled Trajectories [61.3299263929289]
  Simulation-based inference enables learning the parameters of a model even when its likelihood cannot be computed in practice. One class of methods uses data simulated with different parameters to infer an amortized estimator for the likelihood-to-evidence ratio. We show that this approach can be formulated in terms of mutual information between model parameters and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T12:59:16Z)
• Accounting for Unobserved Confounding in Domain Generalization [107.0464488046289]
  This paper investigates the problem of learning robust, generalizable prediction models from a combination of datasets. Part of the challenge of learning robust models lies in the influence of unobserved confounders. We demonstrate the empirical performance of our approach on healthcare data from different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T08:18:06Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)
• Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes [71.44735417472043]
  We show that a posterior approximation distinct from the variational distribution should be used for making decisions. Motivated by these theoretical results, we propose learning several approximate proposals for the best model. In addition to toy examples, we present a full-fledged case study of single-cell RNA sequencing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-17T19:23:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.