The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on the Cloud Computing Risk Landscape

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20104v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:32:36 GMT
• Title: The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on the Cloud Computing Risk Landscape
• Authors: Malikussaid, Sutiyo,
• Abstract summary: The Russian invasion of Ukraine has fundamentally altered the information technology (IT) risk landscape, particularly in cloud computing environments.<n>This paper examines how this geopolitical conflict has accelerated data sovereignty concerns, transformed cybersecurity paradigms, and reshaped cloud infrastructure strategies worldwide.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The Russian invasion of Ukraine has fundamentally altered the information technology (IT) risk landscape, particularly in cloud computing environments. This paper examines how this geopolitical conflict has accelerated data sovereignty concerns, transformed cybersecurity paradigms, and reshaped cloud infrastructure strategies worldwide. Through an analysis of documented cyber operations, regulatory responses, and organizational adaptations between 2022 and early 2025, this research demonstrates how the conflict has served as a catalyst for a broader reassessment of IT risk. The research reveals that while traditional IT risk frameworks offer foundational guidance, their standard application may inadequately address the nuances of state-sponsored threats, conflicting data governance regimes, and the weaponization of digital dependencies without specific geopolitical augmentation. The contribution of this paper lies in its focused synthesis and strategic adaptation of existing best practices into a multi-layered approach. This approach uniquely synergizes resilient cloud architectures (including sovereign and hybrid models), enhanced data-centric security strategies (such as advanced encryption and privacy-enhancing technologies), and geopolitically-informed governance to build digital resilience. The interplay between these layers, emphasizing how geopolitical insights directly shape architectural and security choices beyond standard best practices-particularly by integrating the human element, including personnel vulnerabilities and expertise, as a core consideration in technical design and operational management-offers a more robust defense against the specific, multifaceted risks arising from geopolitical conflict in increasingly fractured digital territories.

Related papers

• Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5 [61.787178868669265]
  This technical report presents an updated and granular assessment of five critical dimensions: cyber offense, persuasion and manipulation, strategic deception, uncontrolled AI R&D, and self-replication.<n>This work reflects our current understanding of AI frontier risks and urges collective action to mitigate these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T04:30:06Z)
• Integrating Public Input and Technical Expertise for Effective Cybersecurity Policy Formulation [0.14323566945483496]
  This paper aims to explore strategies used to balance technical expertise and public input to develop effective cybersecurity policies.<n>A lack of a holistic approach and collaborative efforts to cybersecurity can hinder the effectiveness of cybersecurity policies.<n>Findings suggest that inclusive, flexible governance strategies that integrate public input at every stage are necessary for future cybersecurity policy research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T13:14:40Z)
• AI Regulation in Telecommunications: A Cross-Jurisdictional Legal Study [0.6117371161379207]
  This paper conducts a comparative legal study of policy instruments across ten countries.<n>It examines how telecom, cybersecurity, data protection, and AI laws approach AI-related risks in infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T08:30:12Z)
• Bubble, Bubble, AI's Rumble: Why Global Financial Regulatory Incident Reporting is Our Shield Against Systemic Stumbles [29.86669983369923]
  Current AI incident databases, reliant on crowdsourcing or news scraping, systematically over-look capital market anomalies.<n>We propose a regulatory-grade global database that synthesises post-trade reporting frameworks with proven incident documentation models from healthcare and aviation.<n>We call for immediate action to strengthen risk management and foster resilience in AI-driven financial markets against the volatile "cauldron" of AI-driven systemic risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T12:01:25Z)
• A Global Analysis of Cyber Threats to the Energy Sector: "Currents of Conflict" from a Geopolitical Perspective [0.764671395172401]
  This paper explores the intersection of geopolitical dynamics, cyber threat intelligence analysis, and advanced detection technologies.<n>We leverage generative artificial intelligence to extract and structure information from raw cyber threat descriptions.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of cybersecurity tools in detecting indicators of compromise for energy-targeted attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T12:45:29Z)
• Digital Sovereignty Control Framework for Military AI-based Cyber Security [0.0]
  This article aims to define and assess digital sovereign control of data and AI-based models for military cyber security.<n>Grounded on the concepts of digital sovereignty and data sovereignty, the framework aims to protect sensitive defence assets.<n>At the same time, the framework addresses interoperability challenges among allied forces, strategic and legal considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T13:29:26Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Generative AI-Empowered Secure Communications in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks: A Survey and Tutorial [107.26005706569498]
  Space-air-ground integrated networks (SAGINs) face unprecedented security challenges due to their inherent characteristics.<n>Generative AI (GAI) is a transformative approach that can safeguard SAGIN security by synthesizing data, understanding semantics, and making autonomous decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T01:42:57Z)
• Towards Safety and Security Testing of Cyberphysical Power Systems by Shape Validation [42.350737545269105]
  complexity of cyberphysical power systems leads to larger attack surfaces to be exploited by malicious actors.<n>We propose to meet those risks with a declarative approach to describe cyber power systems and automatically evaluate security and safety controls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T12:07:44Z)
• Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey [25.73174314007904]
  Traditional cybersecurity approaches are struggling to adapt to the rapidly evolving nature of modern cyberattacks.<n>The emergence of Large Language Model (LLM) provides an innovative solution to cope with the increasingly severe cyber threats.<n> exploring how to effectively use LLM to defend against cyberattacks has become a hot topic in the current research field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T06:28:08Z)
• Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape [42.771086928042315]
  This paper presents an in-depth analysis of frontier AI's impact on cybersecurity.<n>We first define and categorize the marginal risks of frontier AI in cybersecurity.<n>We then systemically analyze the current and future impacts of frontier AI in cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T18:25:18Z)
• A Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses in Distributed Computing Environments [55.60375624503877]
  Model Extraction Attacks (MEAs) threaten modern machine learning systems by enabling adversaries to steal models, exposing intellectual property and training data.<n>This survey is motivated by the urgent need to understand how the unique characteristics of cloud, edge, and federated deployments shape attack vectors and defense requirements.<n>We systematically examine the evolution of attack methodologies and defense mechanisms across these environments, demonstrating how environmental factors influence security strategies in critical sectors such as autonomous vehicles, healthcare, and financial services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T03:46:50Z)
• Simulation of Multi-Stage Attack and Defense Mechanisms in Smart Grids [2.0766068042442174]
  We introduce a simulation environment that replicates the power grid's infrastructure and communication dynamics.<n>The framework generates diverse, realistic attack data to train machine learning algorithms for detecting and mitigating cyber threats.<n>It also provides a controlled, flexible platform to evaluate emerging security technologies, including advanced decision support systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T07:07:17Z)
• CTINexus: Automatic Cyber Threat Intelligence Knowledge Graph Construction Using Large Language Models [49.657358248788945]
  Textual descriptions in cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports are rich sources of knowledge about cyber threats.<n>Current CTI knowledge extraction methods lack flexibility and generalizability.<n>We propose CTINexus, a novel framework for data-efficient CTI knowledge extraction and high-quality cybersecurity knowledge graph (CSKG) construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T14:18:32Z)
• Integrative Approaches in Cybersecurity and AI [0.0]
  We identify key trends, challenges, and future directions that hold the potential to revolutionize the way organizations protect, analyze, and leverage their data. Our findings highlight the necessity of cross-disciplinary strategies that incorporate AI-driven automation, real-time threat detection, and advanced data analytics to build more resilient and adaptive security architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T01:37:06Z)
• Privacy Risks of General-Purpose AI Systems: A Foundation for Investigating Practitioner Perspectives [47.17703009473386]
  Powerful AI models have led to impressive leaps in performance across a wide range of tasks. Privacy concerns have led to a wealth of literature covering various privacy risks and vulnerabilities of AI models. We conduct a systematic review of these survey papers to provide a concise and usable overview of privacy risks in GPAIS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T07:49:48Z)
• Beyond Accidents and Misuse: Decoding the Structural Risk Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  This paper advances the concept of structural risk by introducing a framework grounded in complex systems research.<n>We classify structural risks into three categories: antecedent structural causes, antecedent AI system causes, and deleterious feedback loops.<n>To anticipate and govern these dynamics, the paper proposes a methodological agenda incorporating scenario mapping, simulation, and exploratory foresight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T05:44:50Z)
• The MESA Security Model 2.0: A Dynamic Framework for Mitigating Stealth Data Exfiltration [0.0]
  Stealth Data Exfiltration is a significant cyber threat characterized by covert infiltration, extended undetectability, and unauthorized dissemination of confidential data. Our findings reveal that conventional defense-in-depth strategies often fall short in combating these sophisticated threats. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is crucial to anticipate potential threats and continually update our defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T16:14:45Z)
• Generative AI for Secure Physical Layer Communications: A Survey [80.0638227807621]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) stands at the forefront of AI innovation, demonstrating rapid advancement and unparalleled proficiency in generating diverse content. In this paper, we offer an extensive survey on the various applications of GAI in enhancing security within the physical layer of communication networks. We delve into the roles of GAI in addressing challenges of physical layer security, focusing on communication confidentiality, authentication, availability, resilience, and integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T06:22:41Z)
• Navigating the complex nexus: cybersecurity in political landscapes [0.0]
  This study explores the evolving landscape of cyberattacks, their impact on political stability, and strategies for bolstering digital resilience. The research illuminates the intricate network of technological vulnerabilities, geopolitical dynamics, and ethical concerns that shape the dynamic evolution of cybersecurity in politics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T19:37:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.