A Survey of Continual Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21872v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 03:10:20 GMT
• Title: A Survey of Continual Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Chaofan Pan, Xin Yang, Yanhua Li, Wei Wei, Tianrui Li, Bo An, Jiye Liang,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is an important machine learning paradigm for solving sequential decision-making problems.<n>RL's limited ability to generalize across tasks restricts its applicability in dynamic and real-world environments.<n>Continual Reinforcement Learning (CRL) has emerged as a promising research direction to address these limitations.
• Score: 37.12149196139624
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is an important machine learning paradigm for solving sequential decision-making problems. Recent years have witnessed remarkable progress in this field due to the rapid development of deep neural networks. However, the success of RL currently relies on extensive training data and computational resources. In addition, RL's limited ability to generalize across tasks restricts its applicability in dynamic and real-world environments. With the arisen of Continual Learning (CL), Continual Reinforcement Learning (CRL) has emerged as a promising research direction to address these limitations by enabling agents to learn continuously, adapt to new tasks, and retain previously acquired knowledge. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive examination of CRL, focusing on its core concepts, challenges, and methodologies. Firstly, we conduct a detailed review of existing works, organizing and analyzing their metrics, tasks, benchmarks, and scenario settings. Secondly, we propose a new taxonomy of CRL methods, categorizing them into four types from the perspective of knowledge storage and/or transfer. Finally, our analysis highlights the unique challenges of CRL and provides practical insights into future directions.

Related papers

• Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities [62.05713042908654]
  This paper provides a review of advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>We highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data and discuss the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T14:22:24Z)
• Advancements and Challenges in Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Review [23.42371049953867]
  The paper delves into fundamental aspects of continual reinforcement learning, exploring key concepts, significant challenges, and novel methodologies.<n>Special emphasis is placed on recent advancements in continual reinforcement learning within robotics, along with a succinct overview of evaluation environments utilized in prominent research.<n>The review concludes with a discussion on limitations and promising future directions, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners alike.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T04:36:05Z)
• Improving RL Exploration for LLM Reasoning through Retrospective Replay [45.00643118030677]
  We propose a novel algorithm named Retrospective Replay-based Reinforcement Learning (RRL), which introduces a dynamic replay mechanism throughout the training process.<n>RRL enables the model to revisit promising states identified in the early stages, thereby improving its efficiency and effectiveness in exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T17:40:04Z)
• Towards Sample-Efficiency and Generalization of Transfer and Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Literature Review [50.67937325077047]
  This paper is devoted to a comprehensive review of realizing the sample efficiency and generalization of RL algorithms through transfer and inverse reinforcement learning (T-IRL) Our findings denote that a majority of recent research works have dealt with the aforementioned challenges by utilizing human-in-the-loop and sim-to-real strategies. Under the IRL structure, training schemes that require a low number of experience transitions and extension of such frameworks to multi-agent and multi-intention problems have been the priority of researchers in recent years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T15:18:57Z)
• Ensemble Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [43.17635633600716]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a highly effective technique for addressing various scientific and applied problems. In response, ensemble reinforcement learning (ERL), a promising approach that combines the benefits of both RL and ensemble learning (EL), has gained widespread popularity. ERL leverages multiple models or training algorithms to comprehensively explore the problem space and possesses strong generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-05T09:26:44Z)
• A Tutorial on Meta-Reinforcement Learning [69.76165430793571]
  We cast the development of better RL algorithms as a machine learning problem itself in a process called meta-RL.<n>We discuss how, at a high level, meta-RL research can be clustered based on the presence of a task distribution and the learning budget available for each individual task.<n>We conclude by presenting the open problems on the path to making meta-RL part of the standard toolbox for a deep RL practitioner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T12:01:41Z)
• Pretraining in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [17.38360092869849]
  Pretraining has shown to be effective in acquiring transferable knowledge. Due to the nature of reinforcement learning, pretraining in this field is faced with unique challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T02:17:54Z)
• When does return-conditioned supervised learning work for offline reinforcement learning? [51.899892382786526]
  We study the capabilities and limitations of return-conditioned supervised learning. We find that RCSL returns the optimal policy under a set of assumptions stronger than those needed for the more traditional dynamic programming-based algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-02T15:05:42Z)
• Task-Agnostic Continual Reinforcement Learning: Gaining Insights and Overcoming Challenges [27.474011433615317]
  Continual learning (CL) enables the development of models and agents that learn from a sequence of tasks. We investigate the factors that contribute to the performance differences between task-agnostic CL and multi-task (MTL) agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T17:59:00Z)
• Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives [69.48324517535549]
  We aim to provide a literature review of different formulations and approaches to continual reinforcement learning (RL) While still in its early days, the study of continual RL has the promise to develop better incremental reinforcement learners. These include applications such as those in the fields of healthcare, education, logistics, and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-25T02:35:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.