The Anatomy of Evidence: An Investigation Into Explainable ICD Coding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01802v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 15:21:29 GMT
• Title: The Anatomy of Evidence: An Investigation Into Explainable ICD Coding
• Authors: Katharina Beckh, Elisa Studeny, Sujan Sai Gannamaneni, Dario Antweiler, Stefan Rüping,
• Abstract summary: We conduct an in-depth analysis of the MDACE dataset and perform plausibility evaluation of current explainable medical coding systems.<n>Our findings reveal that ground truth evidence aligns with code descriptions to a certain degree.<n>An investigation into state-of-the-art approaches shows a high overlap with ground truth evidence.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automatic medical coding has the potential to ease documentation and billing processes. For this task, transparency plays an important role for medical coders and regulatory bodies, which can be achieved using explainability methods. However, the evaluation of these approaches has been mostly limited to short text and binary settings due to a scarcity of annotated data. Recent efforts by Cheng et al. (2023) have introduced the MDACE dataset, which provides a valuable resource containing code evidence in clinical records. In this work, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the MDACE dataset and perform plausibility evaluation of current explainable medical coding systems from an applied perspective. With this, we contribute to a deeper understanding of automatic medical coding and evidence extraction. Our findings reveal that ground truth evidence aligns with code descriptions to a certain degree. An investigation into state-of-the-art approaches shows a high overlap with ground truth evidence. We propose match measures and highlight success and failure cases. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for developing and evaluating explainable medical coding systems.

Related papers

• Explainable ICD Coding via Entity Linking [2.340984737655165]
  Clinical coding is a critical task in healthcare.<n>Traditional methods for automating clinical coding may not provide sufficient explicit evidence for coders in production environments.<n>We propose to reframe the task as an entity linking problem, in which each document is annotated with its set of codes and respective textual evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T12:49:35Z)
• MKE-Coder: Multi-Axial Knowledge with Evidence Verification in ICD Coding for Chinese EMRs [9.615982382826768]
  This paper introduces a novel framework called MKE-Coder: Multi-axial Knowledge with Evidence verification in ICD coding for Chinese EMRs.<n>We identify candidate codes for the diagnosis and categorize each of them into knowledge under four coding axes.<n>We retrieve corresponding clinical evidence from the comprehensive content of EMRs and filter credible evidence through a scoring model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T08:08:53Z)
• MedCodER: A Generative AI Assistant for Medical Coding [3.7153274758003967]
  We introduce MedCodER, a Generative AI framework for automatic medical coding. MedCodER achieves a micro-F1 score of 0.60 on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code prediction. We present a new dataset containing medical records annotated with disease diagnoses, ICD codes, and supporting evidence texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T19:36:33Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Medical Diagnostic Phrase Identification and Grounding [72.18719355481052]
  We introduce a novel task called Medical Report Grounding (MRG)<n>MRG aims to directly identify diagnostic phrases and their corresponding grounding boxes from medical reports in an end-to-end manner.<n>We propose uMedGround, a robust and reliable framework that leverages a multimodal large language model to predict diagnostic phrases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T07:41:35Z)
• MDACE: MIMIC Documents Annotated with Code Evidence [7.200839302089557]
  We introduce a dataset for evidence/rationale extraction on an extreme multi-label classification task over long medical documents. The dataset -- annotated by professional medical coders -- consists of 302 Inpatient charts with 3,934 evidence spans and 52 Profee charts with 5,563 evidence spans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T22:45:59Z)
• Development and validation of a natural language processing algorithm to pseudonymize documents in the context of a clinical data warehouse [53.797797404164946]
  The study highlights the difficulties faced in sharing tools and resources in this domain. We annotated a corpus of clinical documents according to 12 types of identifying entities. We build a hybrid system, merging the results of a deep learning model as well as manual rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T17:17:46Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Can Current Explainability Help Provide References in Clinical Notes to Support Humans Annotate Medical Codes? [53.45585591262433]
  We present an explainable Read, Attend, and Code (xRAC) framework and assess two approaches, attention score-based xRAC-ATTN and model-agnostic knowledge-distillation-based xRAC-KD. We find that the supporting evidence text highlighted by xRAC-ATTN is of higher quality than xRAC-KD whereas xRAC-KD has potential advantages in production deployment scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T04:06:07Z)
• An Analysis of a BERT Deep Learning Strategy on a Technology Assisted Review Task [91.3755431537592]
  Document screening is a central task within Evidenced Based Medicine. I propose a DL document classification approach with BERT or PubMedBERT embeddings and a DL similarity search path. I test and evaluate the retrieval effectiveness of my DL strategy on the 2017 and 2018 CLEF eHealth collections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T19:45:27Z)
• A Meta-embedding-based Ensemble Approach for ICD Coding Prediction [64.42386426730695]
  International Classification of Diseases (ICD) are the de facto codes used globally for clinical coding. These codes enable healthcare providers to claim reimbursement and facilitate efficient storage and retrieval of diagnostic information. Our proposed approach enhances the performance of neural models by effectively training word vectors using routine medical data as well as external knowledge from scientific articles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-26T17:49:58Z)
• Medical Code Assignment with Gated Convolution and Note-Code Interaction [39.079615516043674]
  We propose a novel method, gated convolutional neural networks, and a note-code interaction (GatedCNN-NCI) for automatic medical code assignment. With a novel note-code interaction design and a graph message passing mechanism, we explicitly capture the underlying dependency between notes and codes. Our proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art models in most cases, and our model size is on par with light-weighted baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T11:37:24Z)
• BiteNet: Bidirectional Temporal Encoder Network to Predict Medical Outcomes [53.163089893876645]
  We propose a novel self-attention mechanism that captures the contextual dependency and temporal relationships within a patient's healthcare journey. An end-to-end bidirectional temporal encoder network (BiteNet) then learns representations of the patient's journeys. We have evaluated the effectiveness of our methods on two supervised prediction and two unsupervised clustering tasks with a real-world EHR dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T00:42:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.