Identifiability in Causal Abstractions: A Hierarchy of Criteria

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06213v1
• Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 17:46:08 GMT
• Title: Identifiability in Causal Abstractions: A Hierarchy of Criteria
• Authors: Clément Yvernes, Emilie Devijver, Marianne Clausel, Eric Gaussier,
• Abstract summary: We consider causal abstractions formalized as collections of causal diagrams, and focus on the identifiability of causal queries within such collections.<n>Our main contribution is to organize these criteria into a structured hierarchy, highlighting their relationships.<n>We illustrate our framework through examples from the literature and provide tools to reason about identifiability when full causal knowledge is unavailable.
• Score: 3.5248694676821484
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Identifying the effect of a treatment from observational data typically requires assuming a fully specified causal diagram. However, such diagrams are rarely known in practice, especially in complex or high-dimensional settings. To overcome this limitation, recent works have explored the use of causal abstractions-simplified representations that retain partial causal information. In this paper, we consider causal abstractions formalized as collections of causal diagrams, and focus on the identifiability of causal queries within such collections. We introduce and formalize several identifiability criteria under this setting. Our main contribution is to organize these criteria into a structured hierarchy, highlighting their relationships. This hierarchical view enables a clearer understanding of what can be identified under varying levels of causal knowledge. We illustrate our framework through examples from the literature and provide tools to reason about identifiability when full causal knowledge is unavailable.

Related papers

• ACCESS : A Benchmark for Abstract Causal Event Discovery and Reasoning [47.540945048737434]
  We introduce textttACCESS, a benchmark designed for discovery and reasoning over abstract causal events.<n>We propose a pipeline for identifying abstractions for event generalizations from a large-scale dataset of implicit commonsense causal knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T06:19:02Z)
• Causal Modeling in Multi-Context Systems: Distinguishing Multiple Context-Specific Causal Graphs which Account for Observational Support [12.738813972869528]
  Causal structure learning with data from multiple contexts carries both opportunities and challenges. Here we study the impact of differing observational support between contexts on the identifiability of causal graphs. We propose a framework to model context-specific independence within structural causal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T10:34:58Z)
• New Rules for Causal Identification with Background Knowledge [59.733125324672656]
  We propose two novel rules for incorporating BK, which offer a new perspective to the open problem. We show that these rules are applicable in some typical causality tasks, such as determining the set of possible causal effects with observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T20:21:21Z)
• Identifying while Learning for Document Event Causality Identification [19.44453370306568]
  Event Causality Identification (ECI) aims to detect whether there exists a causal relation between two events in a document. Existing studies adopt a kind of identifying after learning paradigm, where events' representations are first learned and then used for the identification. We take care of the causal direction and propose a new identifying while learning mode for the ECI task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T03:48:00Z)
• Inducing Causal Structure for Abstractive Text Summarization [76.1000380429553]
  We introduce a Structural Causal Model (SCM) to induce the underlying causal structure of the summarization data. We propose a Causality Inspired Sequence-to-Sequence model (CI-Seq2Seq) to learn the causal representations that can mimic the causal factors. Experimental results on two widely used text summarization datasets demonstrate the advantages of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T16:06:36Z)
• Causal schema induction for knowledge discovery [21.295680010103602]
  We present Torquestra, a dataset of text-graph-schema units integrating temporal, event, and causal structures. We benchmark our dataset on three knowledge discovery tasks, building and evaluating models for each. Results show that systems that harness causal structure are effective at identifying texts sharing similar causal meaning components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T16:55:49Z)
• Abstraction between Structural Causal Models: A Review of Definitions and Properties [0.0]
  Structural causal models (SCMs) are a widespread formalism to deal with causal systems. This paper focuses on the formal properties of a map between SCMs, and highlighting the different layers (structural, distributional) at which these properties may be enforced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T13:47:20Z)
• Effect Identification in Cluster Causal Diagrams [51.42809552422494]
  We introduce a new type of graphical model called cluster causal diagrams (for short, C-DAGs) C-DAGs allow for the partial specification of relationships among variables based on limited prior knowledge. We develop the foundations and machinery for valid causal inferences over C-DAGs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T21:27:31Z)
• Typing assumptions improve identification in causal discovery [123.06886784834471]
  Causal discovery from observational data is a challenging task to which an exact solution cannot always be identified. We propose a new set of assumptions that constrain possible causal relationships based on the nature of the variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T14:23:08Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Causal Discovery in Visual Model Based Reinforcement Learning [76.00395335702572]
  A central goal for AI and causality is the joint discovery of abstract representations and causal structure. Existing environments for studying causal induction are poorly suited for this objective because they have complicated task-specific causal graphs. In this work, our goal is to facilitate research in learning representations of high-level variables as well as causal structures among them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T05:44:56Z)
• Structural Causal Models Are (Solvable by) Credal Networks [70.45873402967297]
  Causal inferences can be obtained by standard algorithms for the updating of credal nets. This contribution should be regarded as a systematic approach to represent structural causal models by credal networks. Experiments show that approximate algorithms for credal networks can immediately be used to do causal inference in real-size problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T11:19:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.