TELSAFE: Security Gap Quantitative Risk Assessment Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06497v1
• Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 02:45:00 GMT
• Title: TELSAFE: Security Gap Quantitative Risk Assessment Framework
• Authors: Sarah Ali Siddiqui, Chandra Thapa, Derui Wang, Rayne Holland, Wei Shao, Seyit Camtepe, Hajime Suzuki, Rajiv Shah,
• Abstract summary: Gaps between established security standards and their practical implementation have the potential to introduce vulnerabilities.<n>We introduce a new hybrid risk assessment framework called TELSAFE, which employs probabilistic modeling for quantitative risk assessment.
• Score: 9.16098821053237
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Gaps between established security standards and their practical implementation have the potential to introduce vulnerabilities, possibly exposing them to security risks. To effectively address and mitigate these security and compliance challenges, security risk management strategies are essential. However, it must adhere to well-established strategies and industry standards to ensure consistency, reliability, and compatibility both within and across organizations. In this paper, we introduce a new hybrid risk assessment framework called TELSAFE, which employs probabilistic modeling for quantitative risk assessment and eliminates the influence of expert opinion bias. The framework encompasses both qualitative and quantitative assessment phases, facilitating effective risk management strategies tailored to the unique requirements of organizations. A specific use case utilizing Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)-related data demonstrates the framework's applicability and implementation in real-world scenarios, such as in the telecommunications industry.

Related papers

• Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systems [79.31011047593492]
  Embodied AI systems are increasingly prevalent across various applications.<n> Ensuring their safety in complex operating environments remains a major challenge.<n>We introduce provable probabilistic safety, which aims to ensure that the residual risk of large-scale deployment remains below a predefined threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T15:46:25Z)
• Beyond Safe Answers: A Benchmark for Evaluating True Risk Awareness in Large Reasoning Models [29.569220030102986]
  We introduce textbfBeyond Safe Answers (BSA) bench, a novel benchmark comprising 2,000 challenging instances organized into three distinct SSA scenario types.<n> Evaluations of 19 state-of-the-art LRMs demonstrate the difficulty of this benchmark, with top-performing models achieving only 38.0% accuracy in correctly identifying risk rationales.<n>Our work provides a comprehensive assessment tool for evaluating and improving safety reasoning fidelity in LRMs, advancing the development of genuinely risk-aware and reliably safe AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T08:49:19Z)
• From nuclear safety to LLM security: Applying non-probabilistic risk management strategies to build safe and secure LLM-powered systems [49.1574468325115]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer unprecedented and growing capabilities, but also introduce complex safety and security challenges.<n>Previous research found that risk management in various fields of engineering such as nuclear or civil engineering is often solved by generic (i.e. field-agnostic) strategies.<n>Here we show how emerging risks in LLM-powered systems could be met with 100+ of these non-probabilistic strategies to risk management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:07:41Z)
• Adapting Probabilistic Risk Assessment for AI [0.0]
  General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems present an urgent risk management challenge.<n>Current methods often rely on selective testing and undocumented assumptions about risk priorities.<n>This paper introduces the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for AI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T17:59:14Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability.<n>The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• A Frontier AI Risk Management Framework: Bridging the Gap Between Current AI Practices and Established Risk Management [0.0]
  The recent development of powerful AI systems has highlighted the need for robust risk management frameworks.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive risk management framework for the development of frontier AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T16:47:00Z)
• A Formal Framework for Assessing and Mitigating Emergent Security Risks in Generative AI Models: Bridging Theory and Dynamic Risk Mitigation [0.3413711585591077]
  As generative AI systems, including large language models (LLMs) and diffusion models, advance rapidly, their growing adoption has led to new and complex security risks. This paper introduces a novel formal framework for categorizing and mitigating these emergent security risks. We identify previously under-explored risks, including latent space exploitation, multi-modal cross-attack vectors, and feedback-loop-induced model degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T02:51:32Z)
• AssessITS: Integrating procedural guidelines and practical evaluation metrics for organizational IT and Cybersecurity risk assessment [0.0]
  'AssessITS' aims to enable organizations to enhance their IT security strength actionable based on internationally recognized standards. 'AssessITS' aims to enable organizations to enhance their IT security strength actionable based on internationally recognized standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T17:01:59Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Safe Inputs but Unsafe Output: Benchmarking Cross-modality Safety Alignment of Large Vision-Language Model [73.8765529028288]
  We introduce a novel safety alignment challenge called Safe Inputs but Unsafe Output (SIUO) to evaluate cross-modality safety alignment.<n>To empirically investigate this problem, we developed the SIUO, a cross-modality benchmark encompassing 9 critical safety domains, such as self-harm, illegal activities, and privacy violations.<n>Our findings reveal substantial safety vulnerabilities in both closed- and open-source LVLMs, underscoring the inadequacy of current models to reliably interpret and respond to complex, real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T16:14:15Z)
• AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security [185.68738503122114]
  We argue that stakeholders in AI risk management should be aware of the nuances, synergies, and interplay between safety and security. We introduce a unified reference framework to clarify the differences and interplay between AI safety and AI security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T21:00:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.