Issue Tracking Ecosystems: Context and Best Practices
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06704v1
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 09:57:13 GMT
- Title: Issue Tracking Ecosystems: Context and Best Practices
- Authors: Lloyd Montgomery,
- Abstract summary: GitHub and Jira are popular tools that support Software Engineering (SE) organisations through the management of issues''<n>An Issue Tracking Ecosystem (ITE) is the aggregate of the central ITS and the related SE artefacts, stakeholders, and processes.<n>I undertake the challenge of understanding ITEs at a broader level, addressing these questions regarding complexity and diversity.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Issue Tracking Systems (ITSs), such as GitHub and Jira, are popular tools that support Software Engineering (SE) organisations through the management of ``issues'', which represent different SE artefacts such as requirements, development tasks, and maintenance items. ITSs also support internal linking between issues, and external linking to other tools and information sources. This provides SE organisations key forms of documentation, including forwards and backwards traceability (e.g., Feature Requests linked to sprint releases and code commits linked to Bug Reports). An Issue Tracking Ecosystem (ITE) is the aggregate of the central ITS and the related SE artefacts, stakeholders, and processes -- with an emphasis on how these contextual factors interact with the ITS. The quality of ITEs is central to the success of these organisations and their software products. There are challenges, however, within ITEs, including complex networks of interlinked artefacts and diverse workflows. While ITSs have been the subject of study in SE research for decades, ITEs as a whole need further exploration. In this thesis, I undertake the challenge of understanding ITEs at a broader level, addressing these questions regarding complexity and diversity. I interviewed practitioners and performed archival analysis on a diverse set of ITSs. These analyses revealed the context-dependent nature of ITE problems, highlighting the need for context-specific ITE research. While previous work has produced many solutions to specific ITS problems, these solutions are not consistently framed in a context-rich and comparable way, leading to a desire for more aligned solutions across research and practice. To address this emergent information and lack of alignment, I created the Best Practice Ontology for ITEs. <... truncated due to arXiv abstract character limit ...>
Related papers
- Benchmarking Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning for ESG Tasks [56.350173737493215]
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports are essential for evaluating sustainability practices, ensuring regulatory compliance, and promoting financial transparency.<n>MMESGBench is a first-of-its-kind benchmark dataset to evaluate multimodal understanding and complex reasoning across structurally diverse and multi-source ESG documents.<n>MMESGBench comprises 933 validated QA pairs derived from 45 ESG documents, spanning across seven distinct document types and three major ESG source categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-25T03:58:07Z) - What is a Feature, Really? Toward a Unified Understanding Across SE Disciplines [0.7125007887148752]
In software engineering, the concept of a feature'' is inconsistently defined across disciplines such as requirements engineering (RE) and software product lines (SPL)<n>This paper proposes an empirical, data-driven approach to explore how features are described, implemented, and managed across real-world projects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T09:08:53Z) - An Empirical Investigation on the Challenges in Scientific Workflow Systems Development [6.920993703034064]
This study examines interactions between developers and researchers on Stack Overflow (SO) and GitHub.<n>By analyzing issues, we identified 13 topics (e.g., Errors and Bug Fixing, Documentation, Dependencies) and discovered that data structures and operations is the most difficult.<n>We also found common topics between SO and GitHub, such as data structures and operations, task management, and workflow scheduling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-16T21:14:11Z) - Transformers Utilization in Chart Understanding: A Review of Recent Advances & Future Trends [1.124958340749622]
This paper reviews prominent research in Understanding (CU)
It focuses on State-of-The-Art (SoTA) frameworks that employ transformers within End-to-End (E2E) solutions.
This article identifies key challenges and outlines promising future directions for advancing CU solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-05T16:26:44Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Underwater Image Enhancement Based on Deep Learning [51.7818820745221]
Underwater image enhancement (UIE) presents a significant challenge within computer vision research.
Despite the development of numerous UIE algorithms, a thorough and systematic review is still absent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T04:46:40Z) - Mining Issue Trackers: Concepts and Techniques [6.99674326582747]
Internal and external stakeholders report, manage, and discuss "issues"
An issue tracker is a software tool used by organisations to interact with users and manage various aspects of the software development lifecycle.
This chapter discusses four major use cases for algorithmically analysing issue data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T23:02:41Z) - A Systematic Literature Review on Explainability for Machine/Deep Learning-based Software Engineering Research [23.273934717819795]
This paper presents a systematic literature review of approaches that aim to improve the explainability of AI models within the context of Software Engineering.<n>We aim to summarize the SE tasks where XAI techniques have shown success to date; (2) classify and analyze different XAI techniques; and (3) investigate existing evaluation approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-26T03:20:40Z) - AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities
and Challenges [60.56413461109281]
Artificial Intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) aims to combine the power of AI with the big data generated by IT Operations processes.
We discuss in depth the key types of data emitted by IT Operations activities, the scale and challenges in analyzing them, and where they can be helpful.
We categorize the key AIOps tasks as - incident detection, failure prediction, root cause analysis and automated actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-10T15:38:12Z) - Environment Generation for Zero-Shot Compositional Reinforcement
Learning [105.35258025210862]
Compositional Design of Environments (CoDE) trains a Generator agent to automatically build a series of compositional tasks tailored to the agent's current skill level.
We learn to generate environments composed of multiple pages or rooms, and train RL agents capable of completing wide-range of complex tasks in those environments.
CoDE yields 4x higher success rate than the strongest baseline, and demonstrates strong performance of real websites learned on 3500 primitive tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-21T21:35:01Z) - Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations.
Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z) - KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Tasks [102.33046195554886]
We present a benchmark for knowledge-intensive language tasks (KILT)
All tasks in KILT are grounded in the same snapshot of Wikipedia.
We find that a shared dense vector index coupled with a seq2seq model is a strong baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-04T15:32:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.