Imitation Learning in Continuous Action Spaces: Mitigating Compounding Error without Interaction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09061v2
• Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 03:47:41 GMT
• Title: Imitation Learning in Continuous Action Spaces: Mitigating Compounding Error without Interaction
• Authors: Thomas T. Zhang, Daniel Pfrommer, Nikolai Matni, Max Simchowitz,
• Abstract summary: We study the problem of imitating an expert demonstrator in a continuous state-and-action dynamical system.<n>We present minimal interventions that mitigate compounding errors in continuous state-and-action imitation learning.
• Score: 23.93098879202432
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We study the problem of imitating an expert demonstrator in a continuous state-and-action dynamical system. While imitation learning in discrete settings such as autoregressive language modeling has seen immense success and popularity in recent years, imitation in physical settings such as autonomous driving and robot learning has proven comparably more complex due to the compounding errors problem, often requiring elaborate set-ups to perform stably. Recent work has demonstrated that even in benign settings, exponential compounding errors are unavoidable when learning solely from expert-controlled trajectories, suggesting the need for more advanced policy parameterizations or data augmentation. To this end, we present minimal interventions that provably mitigate compounding errors in continuous state-and-action imitation learning. When the system is open-loop stable, we prescribe "action chunking," i.e., predicting and playing sequences of actions in open-loop; when the system is possibly unstable, we prescribe "noise injection," i.e., adding noise during expert demonstrations. These interventions align with popular choices in modern robot learning, though the benefits we derive are distinct from the effects they were designed to target. Our results draw insights and tools from both control theory and reinforcement learning; however, our analysis reveals novel considerations that do not naturally arise when either literature is considered in isolation.

Related papers

• The Pitfalls of Imitation Learning when Actions are Continuous [33.44344966171865]
  We study the problem of imitating an expert demonstrator in a continuous state-and-action control system.<n>We show that, even if the dynamics satisfy a control-theoretic property called exponentially stability, any smooth, deterministic imitator policy necessarily suffers error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T18:11:37Z)
• Logarithmic Regret for Nonlinear Control [5.473636587010879]
  We address the problem of learning to control an unknown nonlinear dynamical system through sequential interactions.<n>Motivated by high-stakes applications in which mistakes can be catastrophic, we study situations where it is possible for fast sequential learning to occur.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T15:42:42Z)
• A Mathematical Model of the Hidden Feedback Loop Effect in Machine Learning Systems [44.99833362998488]
  We introduce a repeated learning process to jointly describe several phenomena attributed to unintended hidden feedback loops. A distinctive feature of such repeated learning setting is that the state of the environment becomes causally dependent on the learner itself over time. We present a novel dynamical systems model of the repeated learning process and prove the limiting set of probability distributions for positive and negative feedback loop modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T17:57:24Z)
• Can Active Sampling Reduce Causal Confusion in Offline Reinforcement Learning? [58.942118128503104]
  Causal confusion is a phenomenon where an agent learns a policy that reflects imperfect spurious correlations in the data. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in domains such as robotics. In this paper, we study causal confusion in offline reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T17:54:56Z)
• Interpretable Imitation Learning with Dynamic Causal Relations [65.18456572421702]
  We propose to expose captured knowledge in the form of a directed acyclic causal graph. We also design this causal discovery process to be state-dependent, enabling it to model the dynamics in latent causal graphs. The proposed framework is composed of three parts: a dynamic causal discovery module, a causality encoding module, and a prediction module, and is trained in an end-to-end manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T20:59:42Z)
• Imitating, Fast and Slow: Robust learning from demonstrations via decision-time planning [96.72185761508668]
  Planning at Test-time (IMPLANT) is a new meta-algorithm for imitation learning. We demonstrate that IMPLANT significantly outperforms benchmark imitation learning approaches on standard control environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T17:16:52Z)
• Shaking the foundations: delusions in sequence models for interaction and control [45.34593341136043]
  We show that sequence models "lack the understanding of the cause and effect of their actions" leading them to draw incorrect inferences due to auto-suggestive delusions. We show that in supervised learning, one can teach a system to condition or intervene on data by training with factual and counterfactual error signals respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T23:31:05Z)
• Social NCE: Contrastive Learning of Socially-aware Motion Representations [87.82126838588279]
  Experimental results show that the proposed method dramatically reduces the collision rates of recent trajectory forecasting, behavioral cloning and reinforcement learning algorithms. Our method makes few assumptions about neural architecture designs, and hence can be used as a generic way to promote the robustness of neural motion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T22:25:06Z)
• Bridging the Imitation Gap by Adaptive Insubordination [88.35564081175642]
  We show that when the teaching agent makes decisions with access to privileged information, this information is marginalized during imitation learning. We propose 'Adaptive Insubordination' (ADVISOR) to address this gap. ADVISOR dynamically weights imitation and reward-based reinforcement learning losses during training, enabling on-the-fly switching between imitation and exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T17:59:57Z)
• State-Only Imitation Learning for Dexterous Manipulation [63.03621861920732]
  In this paper, we explore state-only imitation learning. We train an inverse dynamics model and use it to predict actions for state-only demonstrations. Our method performs on par with state-action approaches and considerably outperforms RL alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T17:57:20Z)
• Metric-Based Imitation Learning Between Two Dissimilar Anthropomorphic Robotic Arms [29.08134072341867]
  One major challenge in imitation learning is the correspondence problem. We introduce a distance measure between dissimilar embodiments. We find that the measure is well suited for describing the similarity between embodiments and for learning imitation policies by distance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T19:47:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.