Optimal Differentially Private Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09388v1
• Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 20:09:28 GMT
• Title: Optimal Differentially Private Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons
• Authors: T. Tony Cai, Abhinav Chakraborty, Yichen Wang,
• Abstract summary: We develop and analyze ranking methods under two privacy notions: edge differential privacy and individual differential privacy.<n>Our algorithms achieve minimax optimal rates of convergence under the respective privacy constraints.
• Score: 4.524669884005837
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Data privacy is a central concern in many applications involving ranking from incomplete and noisy pairwise comparisons, such as recommendation systems, educational assessments, and opinion surveys on sensitive topics. In this work, we propose differentially private algorithms for ranking based on pairwise comparisons. Specifically, we develop and analyze ranking methods under two privacy notions: edge differential privacy, which protects the confidentiality of individual comparison outcomes, and individual differential privacy, which safeguards potentially many comparisons contributed by a single individual. Our algorithms--including a perturbed maximum likelihood estimator and a noisy count-based method--are shown to achieve minimax optimal rates of convergence under the respective privacy constraints. We further demonstrate the practical effectiveness of our methods through experiments on both simulated and real-world data.

Related papers

• Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: An Utility-Enhanced Approach [12.614480013684759]
  Federated learning has emerged as an attractive approach to protect data privacy by eliminating the need for sharing clients' data.<n>Recent studies have shown that federated learning alone does not guarantee privacy, as private data may still be inferred from the uploaded parameters to the central server.<n>We present a modification to these vanilla differentially private algorithms based on a Haar wavelet transformation step and a novel noise injection scheme that significantly lowers the bound of the noise variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T04:48:29Z)
• Differentially Private Random Feature Model [52.468511541184895]
  We produce a differentially private random feature model for privacy-preserving kernel machines.<n>We show that our method preserves privacy and derive a generalization error bound for the method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T05:31:08Z)
• Private Estimation when Data and Privacy Demands are Correlated [5.755004576310333]
  Differential Privacy is the current gold-standard for ensuring privacy for statistical queries.<n>We consider the problems of empirical mean estimation for univariate data and frequency estimation for categorical data.<n>We establish theoretical performance guarantees for our proposed algorithms, under both PAC error and mean-squared error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T22:46:02Z)
• TernaryVote: Differentially Private, Communication Efficient, and Byzantine Resilient Distributed Optimization on Heterogeneous Data [50.797729676285876]
  We propose TernaryVote, which combines a ternary compressor and the majority vote mechanism to realize differential privacy, gradient compression, and Byzantine resilience simultaneously. We theoretically quantify the privacy guarantee through the lens of the emerging f-differential privacy (DP) and the Byzantine resilience of the proposed algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T16:41:14Z)
• Improving the Variance of Differentially Private Randomized Experiments through Clustering [16.166525280886578]
  We propose a new differentially private mechanism, "Cluster-DP"<n>We demonstrate that selecting higher-quality clusters, according to a quality metric we introduce, can decrease the variance penalty without compromising privacy guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T05:51:57Z)
• Theoretically Principled Federated Learning for Balancing Privacy and Utility [61.03993520243198]
  We propose a general learning framework for the protection mechanisms that protects privacy via distorting model parameters. It can achieve personalized utility-privacy trade-off for each model parameter, on each client, at each communication round in federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T13:44:02Z)
• Ranking Differential Privacy [17.826241775212786]
  Existing works mainly develop privacy protection on a single ranking within a set of ranking or pairwise comparisons of a ranking under the $epsilon$-differential privacy. This paper proposes a novel notion called $epsilon$-ranking differential privacy for protecting ranks. We develop a multistage ranking algorithm to generate synthetic rankings while satisfying the developed $epsilon$-ranking differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T19:12:42Z)
• Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guarantees [65.3684804101664]
  We consider partial differential privacy (DP), which allows quantifying the privacy guarantee on a per-attribute basis. In this work, we study several basic data analysis and learning tasks, and design algorithms whose per-attribute privacy parameter is smaller that the best possible privacy parameter for the entire record of a person.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T22:43:50Z)
• Individual Privacy Accounting for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent [69.14164921515949]
  We characterize privacy guarantees for individual examples when releasing models trained by DP-SGD. We find that most examples enjoy stronger privacy guarantees than the worst-case bound. This implies groups that are underserved in terms of model utility simultaneously experience weaker privacy guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T13:49:37Z)
• Non-parametric Differentially Private Confidence Intervals for the Median [3.205141100055992]
  This paper proposes and evaluates several strategies to compute valid differentially private confidence intervals for the median. We also illustrate that addressing both sources of uncertainty--the error from sampling and the error from protecting the output--should be preferred over simpler approaches that incorporate the uncertainty in a sequential fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T19:45:37Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.