Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09662v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 14:51:59 GMT
• Title: Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey
• Authors: Jason Zhu, Hongyu Li,
• Abstract summary: Large reasoning models (LRMs) like OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1 have demonstrated impressive performance on complex reasoning tasks.<n>These models also face a huge challenge that generating unnecessarily lengthy and redundant reasoning chains.
• Score: 8.736170026262279
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large reasoning models (LRMs) like OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1 have demonstrated impressive performance on complex reasoning tasks like mathematics and programming with long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning sequences (slow-thinking), compared with traditional large language models (fast-thinking). However, these reasoning models also face a huge challenge that generating unnecessarily lengthy and redundant reasoning chains even for trivial questions. This phenomenon leads to a significant waste of inference resources, increases the response time for simple queries, and hinders the practical application of LRMs in real-world products. To this end, it is crucial to shorten lengthy reasoning chains and learn adaptive reasoning between fast and slow thinking based on input difficulty. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of recent progress in concise and adaptive thinking for efficient reasoning of LRMs, including methodologies, benchmarks, and challenges for future exploration. We hope this survey can help researchers quickly understand the landscape of this field and inspire novel adaptive thinking ideas to facilitate better usage of LRMs.

Related papers

• To Think or Not To Think, That is The Question for Large Reasoning Models in Theory of Mind Tasks [56.11584171938381]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) assesses whether models can infer hidden mental states such as beliefs, desires, and intentions.<n>Recent progress in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) has boosted step-by-step inference in mathematics and coding.<n>We present a systematic study of nine advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) comparing reasoning models with non-reasoning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T08:16:13Z)
• R-Horizon: How Far Can Your Large Reasoning Model Really Go in Breadth and Depth? [63.51955244144878]
  R-HORIZON is a method designed to stimulate long-horizon reasoning behaviors in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs)<n>Based on R-HORIZON, we construct a long-horizon reasoning benchmark, comprising complex multi-step reasoning tasks with interdependent problems that span long reasoning horizons.<n>Our analysis reveals that LRMs exhibit limited effective reasoning length and struggle to allocate thinking budget across multiple problems appropriately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T13:16:22Z)
• Explore Briefly, Then Decide: Mitigating LLM Overthinking via Cumulative Entropy Regulation [82.62935304152239]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning abilities on complex problems using long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.<n>They often suffer from overthinking, meaning generating unnecessarily lengthy reasoning steps for simpler problems.<n>We introduce a novel metric Token Entropy Cumulative Average (TECA), which measures the extent of exploration throughout the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T17:36:50Z)
• From Long to Short: LLMs Excel at Trimming Own Reasoning Chains [48.692414597960244]
  O1/R1 style large reasoning models (LRMs) signal a substantial leap forward over conventional instruction-following LLMs.<n>Recent studies show that LRMs are prone to suffer from overthinking.<n>We propose a test-time scaling method, EDIT, which efficiently guides LRMs to identify the shortest correct reasoning paths at test time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T19:00:44Z)
• Don't Overthink It: A Survey of Efficient R1-style Large Reasoning Models [49.598776427454176]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have gradually become a research hotspot due to their outstanding performance in handling complex tasks.<n>However, with the widespread application of these models, the problem of overthinking has gradually emerged.<n>Various efficient reasoning methods have been proposed, aiming to reduce the length of reasoning paths without compromising model performance and reasoning capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:54:31Z)
• Think How to Think: Mitigating Overthinking with Autonomous Difficulty Cognition in Large Reasoning Models [12.618562275265704]
  Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex reasoning tasks but often suffer from overthinking.<n>We propose Think-How-to-Think (TH2T), a novel two-stage fine-tuning strategy that progressively inspires LRMs' difficulty cognition and redundancy cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:24:26Z)
• OThink-R1: Intrinsic Fast/Slow Thinking Mode Switching for Over-Reasoning Mitigation [33.008513399946914]
  OThink-R1 is a method that prunes redundant reasoning steps while preserving logical validity.<n> Experiments across mathematical and question-answering tasks demonstrate that OThink-R1 reduces reasoning redundancy by almost 23% on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T03:31:30Z)
• Let LLMs Break Free from Overthinking via Self-Braking Tuning [60.08396797526657]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have significantly enhanced their reasoning capabilities by generating longer chains of thought.<n>This performance gain comes at the cost of a substantial increase in redundant reasoning during the generation process.<n>We propose a novel framework, Self-Braking Tuning (SBT), which tackles overthinking from the perspective of allowing the model to regulate its own reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:53:40Z)
• Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMs [52.405085773954596]
  We find that large language models (LLMs) tend to overthink simple problems, generating unnecessarily long outputs, and underthink harder ones.<n>This indicates that models might misjudge problem difficulty and fail to calibrate their response length appropriately.<n> Experiments show that the generation length can be significantly reduced while maintaining acceptable accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T18:48:06Z)
• A Short Survey on Small Reasoning Models: Training, Inference, Applications and Research Directions [42.77077835885798]
  Reasoning capabilities of large reasoning models (LRMs) have seen significant advancements through the slow thinking process.<n>In contrast, small reasoning models (SRMs), often distilled from larger ones, offer greater efficiency and can exhibit distinct capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T06:45:57Z)
• FReM: A Flexible Reasoning Mechanism for Balancing Quick and Slow Thinking in Long-Context Question Answering [18.213334065233465]
  We propose FReM: Flexible Reasoning Mechanism, a method that adjusts reasoning depth according to the complexity of each question.<n>Specifically, FReM leverages synthetic reference QA examples to provide an explicit chain of thought, enabling efficient handling of simple queries.<n>Experiments on seven QA datasets show that FReM improves reasoning accuracy and scalability, particularly for complex multihop questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T06:20:12Z)
• A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyond [88.5807076505261]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance gains by scaling up the length of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning during inference.<n>A growing concern lies in their tendency to produce excessively long reasoning traces.<n>This inefficiency introduces significant challenges for training, inference, and real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T15:36:30Z)
• Trade-offs in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Analysis of Deliberative and Adaptive Reasoning over Foundational Capabilities [101.77467538102924]
  Recent advancements in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in specialized reasoning tasks.<n>We show that acquiring deliberative reasoning capabilities significantly reduces the foundational capabilities of LRMs.<n>We demonstrate that adaptive reasoning -- employing modes like Zero-Thinking, Less-Thinking, and Summary-Thinking -- can effectively alleviate these drawbacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T08:18:51Z)
• Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models [54.04678363287392]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex tasks.<n>Recent advancements in OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have further improved performance in System-2 reasoning domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T17:59:38Z)
• Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models [39.781889862599854]
  Long chain-of-thought (Long CoT) characteristics enhance reasoning abilities and enable the solution of intricate problems.<n>We first distinguish Long CoT from Short CoT and introduce a novel taxonomy to categorize current reasoning paradigms.<n>We then investigate key phenomena such as the emergence of Long CoT with these characteristics, including overthinking, and inference-time scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T17:35:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.