Cross-modal Associations in Vision and Language Models: Revisiting the Bouba-Kiki Effect

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10013v2
• Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 06:25:34 GMT
• Title: Cross-modal Associations in Vision and Language Models: Revisiting the Bouba-Kiki Effect
• Abstract summary: We re-evaluate the bouba-kiki effect, where humans reliably associate pseudowords like bouba' with round shapes and kiki' with jagged ones.<n>We show that these model variants do not consistently exhibit the bouba-kiki effect.<n>Results contribute to the ongoing debate about the extent to which vision-and-language models truly understand cross-modal concepts.
• Score: 0.8793721044482612
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in multimodal models have raised questions about whether vision-and-language models (VLMs) integrate cross-modal information in ways that reflect human cognition. One well-studied test case in this domain is the bouba-kiki effect, where humans reliably associate pseudowords like `bouba' with round shapes and `kiki' with jagged ones. Given the mixed evidence found in prior studies for this effect in VLMs, we present a comprehensive re-evaluation focused on two variants of CLIP, ResNet and Vision Transformer (ViT), given their centrality in many state-of-the-art VLMs. We apply two complementary methods closely modelled after human experiments: a prompt-based evaluation that uses probabilities as a measure of model preference, and we use Grad-CAM as a novel approach to interpret visual attention in shape-word matching tasks. Our findings show that these model variants do not consistently exhibit the bouba-kiki effect. While ResNet shows a preference for round shapes, overall performance across both model variants lacks the expected associations. Moreover, direct comparison with prior human data on the same task shows that the models' responses fall markedly short of the robust, modality-integrated behaviour characteristic of human cognition. These results contribute to the ongoing debate about the extent to which VLMs truly understand cross-modal concepts, highlighting limitations in their internal representations and alignment with human intuitions.

Related papers

• Interpretable and Fair Generalized Additive Neural Networks via Multi-objective Learning [52.66717986145448]
  Interpretability and fairness are two of the most emphasized dimensions in trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI)<n>This paper focuses on neural network (NN)-based generalized additive models (GAMs), a class of self-interpretable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T07:29:42Z)
• Cross-View Feature Matching: Survey, Benchmarking, and Foundation-Model Perspectives [74.46417373478194]
  Cross-view feature matching aims to establish reliable correspondences across images with large viewpoint variations.<n>Over the past decade, the field has evolved from task-specific models toward increasingly unified and generalizable correspondence models.<n>Despite these advances, existing studies remain highly diverse in their problem formulations, model architectures, training paradigms, and evaluation protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T16:00:40Z)
• A Study of Failure Modes in Two-Stage Human-Object Interaction Detection [49.37675694881915]
  We present a study to better understand the failure modes of two-stage HOI models.<n>We decompose HOI detection into multiple interpretable perspectives to study different types of failure patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T04:01:23Z)
• LVLM-Aided Alignment of Task-Specific Vision Models [49.96265491629163]
  Small task-specific vision models are crucial in high-stakes domains.<n>We introduce a novel and efficient method for aligning small task-specific vision models with human domain knowledge.<n>Our method demonstrates substantial improvement in aligning model behavior with human specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-26T11:11:25Z)
• Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs [65.93003087656754]
  VisFactor is a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from a well-established cognitive psychology assessment.<n>We evaluate 20 frontier Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) from GPT, Gemini, Claude, LLaMA, Qwen, and SEED families.<n>The best-performing model achieves a score of only 25.19 out of 100, with consistent failures on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T04:21:32Z)
• Illusory VQA: Benchmarking and Enhancing Multimodal Models on Visual Illusions [0.03495246564946555]
  We introduce a novel task called Illusory VQA, along with four specialized datasets: IllusionMNIST, IllusionFashionMNIST, IllusionAnimals, and IllusionChar.<n>These datasets are designed to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art multimodal models in recognizing and interpreting visual illusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T07:51:18Z)
• Cross-Modal Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models [33.229271701817616]
  We introduce a novel concept termed cross-modal consistency. Our experimental findings reveal a pronounced inconsistency between the vision and language modalities within GPT-4V. Our research yields insights into the appropriate utilization of such models and hints at potential avenues for enhancing their design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T08:22:42Z)
• Human-Object Interaction Detection Collaborated with Large Relation-driven Diffusion Models [65.82564074712836]
  We introduce DIFfusionHOI, a new HOI detector shedding light on text-to-image diffusion models. We first devise an inversion-based strategy to learn the expression of relation patterns between humans and objects in embedding space. These learned relation embeddings then serve as textual prompts, to steer diffusion models generate images that depict specific interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T12:00:33Z)
• Are Visual-Language Models Effective in Action Recognition? A Comparative Study [22.97135293252601]
  This paper provides a large-scale study and insight on state-of-the-art vision foundation models. It compares their transfer ability onto zero-shot and frame-wise action recognition tasks. Experiments are conducted on recent fine-grained, human-centric action recognition datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T16:28:21Z)
• VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models [75.88987277686914]
  We present the Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models (VHELM) VHELM aggregates various datasets to cover one or more of the 9 aspects: visual perception, knowledge, reasoning, bias, fairness, multilinguality, robustness, toxicity, and safety. Our framework is designed to be lightweight and automatic so that evaluation runs are cheap and fast.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:46:34Z)
• Linking Robustness and Generalization: A k* Distribution Analysis of Concept Clustering in Latent Space for Vision Models [56.89974470863207]
  This article uses the k* Distribution, a local neighborhood analysis method, to examine the learned latent space at the level of individual concepts. We introduce skewness-based true and approximate metrics for interpreting individual concepts to assess the overall quality of vision models' latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T01:43:51Z)
• What does Kiki look like? Cross-modal associations between speech sounds and visual shapes in vision-and-language models [0.10923877073891446]
  Cross-modal preferences play a prominent role in our linguistic processing, language learning, and the origins of signal-meaning mappings. We probe and compare four vision- and-language (VLM) models for a well-known human cross-modal preference, the bouba-kiki effect. Our findings inform discussions on the origins of the bouba-kiki effect in human cognition and future developments of VLMs that align well with human cross-modal associations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T12:09:41Z)
• From CNNs to Transformers in Multimodal Human Action Recognition: A Survey [23.674123304219822]
  Human action recognition is one of the most widely studied research problems in Computer Vision. Recent studies have shown that addressing it using multimodal data leads to superior performance. Recent rise of Transformers in visual modelling is now also causing a paradigm shift for the action recognition task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T02:11:18Z)
• VALOR-EVAL: Holistic Coverage and Faithfulness Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models [57.43276586087863]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination issues, wherein the models generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect outputs. Existing benchmarks are often limited in scope, focusing mainly on object hallucinations. We introduce a multi-dimensional benchmark covering objects, attributes, and relations, with challenging images selected based on associative biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T04:49:22Z)
• SA-Attack: Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models via Self-Augmentation [56.622250514119294]
  In contrast to white-box adversarial attacks, transfer attacks are more reflective of real-world scenarios. We propose a self-augment-based transfer attack method, termed SA-Attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T09:08:50Z)
• Unsupervised discovery of Interpretable Visual Concepts [0.0]
  We propose two methods to explain a model's decision, enhancing global interpretability. One method is inspired by Occlusion and Sensitivity analysis (incorporating causality) The other method uses a novel metric, called Class-aware Order Correlation (CaOC), to globally evaluate the most important image regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T07:53:02Z)
• Adaptive Contextual Perception: How to Generalize to New Backgrounds and Ambiguous Objects [75.15563723169234]
  We investigate how vision models adaptively use context for out-of-distribution generalization. We show that models that excel in one setting tend to struggle in the other. To replicate the generalization abilities of biological vision, computer vision models must have factorized object vs. background representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T15:29:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.