Why can't Epidemiology be automated (yet)?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15617v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 13:41:52 GMT
• Title: Why can't Epidemiology be automated (yet)?
• Authors: David Bann, Ed Lowther, Liam Wright, Yevgeniya Kovalchuk,
• Abstract summary: We map the landscape of epidemiological tasks using existing datasets.<n>We identify where existing AI tools offer efficiency gains.<n>We demonstrate that recently developed agentic systems can now design and execute epidemiological analysis.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) - particularly generative AI - present new opportunities to accelerate, or even automate, epidemiological research. Unlike disciplines based on physical experimentation, a sizable fraction of Epidemiology relies on secondary data analysis and thus is well-suited for such augmentation. Yet, it remains unclear which specific tasks can benefit from AI interventions or where roadblocks exist. Awareness of current AI capabilities is also mixed. Here, we map the landscape of epidemiological tasks using existing datasets - from literature review to data access, analysis, writing up, and dissemination - and identify where existing AI tools offer efficiency gains. While AI can increase productivity in some areas such as coding and administrative tasks, its utility is constrained by limitations of existing AI models (e.g. hallucinations in literature reviews) and human systems (e.g. barriers to accessing datasets). Through examples of AI-generated epidemiological outputs, including fully AI-generated papers, we demonstrate that recently developed agentic systems can now design and execute epidemiological analysis, albeit to varied quality (see https://github.com/edlowther/automated-epidemiology). Epidemiologists have new opportunities to empirically test and benchmark AI systems; realising the potential of AI will require two-way engagement between epidemiologists and engineers.

Related papers

• Beyond Black-Box AI: Interpretable Hybrid Systems for Dementia Care [2.4339626079536925]
  The recent boom of large language models (LLMs) has re-ignited the hope that artificial intelligence (AI) systems could aid medical diagnosis.<n>Despite dazzling benchmark scores, LLM assistants have yet to deliver measurable improvements at the bedside.<n>This scoping review aims to highlight the areas where AI is limited to make practical contributions in the clinical setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T01:43:06Z)
• AI-Driven Automation Can Become the Foundation of Next-Era Science of Science Research [58.944125758758936]
  The Science of Science (SoS) explores the mechanisms underlying scientific discovery.<n>The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) presents a transformative opportunity for the next generation of SoS.<n>We outline the advantages of AI over traditional methods, discuss potential limitations, and propose pathways to overcome them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T15:01:33Z)
• A Study on Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Healthcare Perspectives [2.5782420501870296]
  Symbolic AI excels in reasoning, explainability, and knowledge representation but faces challenges in processing complex real-world data with noise.<n>Deep learning (Black-Box systems) research breakthroughs in neural networks are notable, yet they lack reasoning and interpretability.<n>Neuro-symbolic AI (NeSy) attempts to bridge this gap by integrating logical reasoning into neural networks, enabling them to learn and reason with symbolic representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T21:33:38Z)
• The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Emergency Medicine: A Review of Recent Advances [0.2544903230401084]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing emergency medicine by enhancing diagnostic processes and improving patient outcomes.<n>Machine learning and deep learning are pivotal in interpreting complex imaging data, offering rapid, accurate diagnoses and potentially surpassing traditional diagnostic methods.<n>Despite these advancements, the integration of AI into clinical practice presents challenges such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the need for extensive validation across diverse settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T17:45:00Z)
• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• AI-in-the-loop: The future of biomedical visual analytics applications in the era of AI [3.0942901747200975]
  How will massive developments of AI in data analytics shape future data visualizations and visual analytics?<n>What are opportunities, open challenges and threats in the context of an increasingly powerful AI?<n>We highlight the potential of AI to transform biomedical visualization as a research field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T13:27:24Z)
• The Dual Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Balancing Advancements with Ethical and Operational Challenges [1.3302498881305604]
  This paper takes a close look at how AI is transforming areas such as diagnostics, precision medicine, and drug discovery.<n>Issues like patient privacy, safety, and the fairness of AI decisions are explored to understand whether AI in healthcare is a positive force, a potential risk, or perhaps both.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T23:36:16Z)
• AI-Generated Images as Data Source: The Dawn of Synthetic Era [61.879821573066216]
  generative AI has unlocked the potential to create synthetic images that closely resemble real-world photographs. This paper explores the innovative concept of harnessing these AI-generated images as new data sources. In contrast to real data, AI-generated data exhibit remarkable advantages, including unmatched abundance and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T06:55:19Z)
• A Survey on Brain-Inspired Deep Learning via Predictive Coding [85.93245078403875]
  Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks.<n>PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.