Related papers: Handcrafted vs. Deep Radiomics vs. Fusion vs. Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning -Based Cancer Outcome Prediction in PET and SPECT Imaging

Handcrafted vs. Deep Radiomics vs. Fusion vs. Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning -Based Cancer Outcome Prediction in PET and SPECT Imaging

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16065v2
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:51:42 GMT
Title: Handcrafted vs. Deep Radiomics vs. Fusion vs. Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning -Based Cancer Outcome Prediction in PET and SPECT Imaging
Authors: Mohammad R. Salmanpour, Somayeh Sadat Mehrnia, Sajad Jabarzadeh Ghandilu, Zhino Safahi, Sonya Falahati, Shahram Taeb, Ghazal Mousavi, Mehdi Maghsoudi, Ahmad Shariftabrizi, Ilker Hacihaliloglu, Arman Rahmim,
Abstract summary: This systematic review analyzed 226 studies published from 2020 to 2025 that applied machine learning to PET or SPECT imaging for outcome prediction.<n> PET-based studies generally outperformed those using SPECT, likely due to higher spatial resolution and sensitivity.<n>Common limitations included inadequate handling of class imbalance, missing data, and low population diversity.
Score: 0.7573820776203027
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: Machine learning (ML), including deep learning (DL) and radiomics-based methods, is increasingly used for cancer outcome prediction with PET and SPECT imaging. However, the comparative performance of handcrafted radiomics features (HRF), deep radiomics features (DRF), DL models, and hybrid fusion approaches remains inconsistent across clinical applications. This systematic review analyzed 226 studies published from 2020 to 2025 that applied ML to PET or SPECT imaging for outcome prediction. Each study was evaluated using a 59-item framework covering dataset construction, feature extraction, validation methods, interpretability, and risk of bias. We extracted key details including model type, cancer site, imaging modality, and performance metrics such as accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). PET-based studies (95%) generally outperformed those using SPECT, likely due to higher spatial resolution and sensitivity. DRF models achieved the highest mean accuracy (0.862), while fusion models yielded the highest AUC (0.861). ANOVA confirmed significant differences in performance (accuracy: p=0.0006, AUC: p=0.0027). Common limitations included inadequate handling of class imbalance (59%), missing data (29%), and low population diversity (19%). Only 48% of studies adhered to IBSI standards. These findings highlight the need for standardized pipelines, improved data quality, and explainable AI to support clinical integration.

Related papers

An Explainable AI-Enhanced Machine Learning Approach for Cardiovascular Disease Detection and Risk Assessment [0.0]
Heart disease remains a major global health concern.<n>Traditional diagnostic methods fail to accurately identify and manage heart disease risks.<n>Machine learning has the potential to significantly enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and speed of heart disease diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-15T10:38:38Z)
Comparative Evaluation of Radiomics and Deep Learning Models for Disease Detection in Chest Radiography [0.0]
We evaluate radiomics-based and deep learning-based approaches for disease detection in chest radiography.<n>Deep learning models learn directly from image data, while radiomics-based models extract handcrafted features.<n>These findings provide statistically validated, data-driven recommendations for model selection in diagnostic AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-16T16:54:37Z)
Semi-Supervised Learning for Dose Prediction in Targeted Radionuclide: A Synthetic Data Study [44.18078370879369]
Targeted Radionuclide Therapy (TRT) is a modern strategy in radiation oncology that aims to administer a potent radiation dose specifically to cancer cells.<n>Deep learning holds promise for personalizing TRT doses.<n>Current methods require large time series of SPECT imaging, which is hardly achievable in routine clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T12:21:09Z)
EVolutionary Independent DEtermiNistiC Explanation [5.127310126394387]
This paper introduces the Evolutionary Independent Deterministic Explanation (EVIDENCE) theory.<n>EVIDENCE offers a deterministic, model-independent method for extracting significant signals from black-box models.<n> Practical applications of EVIDENCE include improving diagnostic accuracy in healthcare and enhancing audio signal analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-20T12:05:14Z)
CRTRE: Causal Rule Generation with Target Trial Emulation Framework [47.2836994469923]
We introduce a novel method called causal rule generation with target trial emulation framework (CRTRE) CRTRE applies randomize trial design principles to estimate the causal effect of association rules. We then incorporate such association rules for the downstream applications such as prediction of disease onsets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-10T02:40:06Z)
Deep Radiomics Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multicenter MRI: Initial Comparison to PI-RADS Assessment [0.0]
This study analyzed biparametric (T2W and DW) prostate MRI sequences of 615 patients (mean age, 63.1 +/- 7 years) from four datasets acquired between 2010 and 2020. Deep radiomics machine learning model achieved comparable performance to PI-RADS assessment in csPCa detection at the patient-level but not at the lesion-level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T17:41:58Z)
Machine Learning for ALSFRS-R Score Prediction: Making Sense of the Sensor Data [44.99833362998488]
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that presents individuals with limited treatment options. The present investigation, spearheaded by the iDPP@CLEF 2024 challenge, focuses on utilizing sensor-derived data obtained through an app.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T19:17:23Z)
Comparative Analysis of Epileptic Seizure Prediction: Exploring Diverse Pre-Processing Techniques and Machine Learning Models [0.0]
We present a comparative analysis of five machine learning models for the prediction of epileptic seizures using EEG data. The results of our analysis demonstrate the performance of each model in terms of accuracy. The ET model exhibited the best performance with an accuracy of 99.29%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-06T08:50:08Z)
Deep-Learning Tool for Early Identifying Non-Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Etiology based on CT Scan [40.51754649947294]
The deep learning model was developed with 1868 eligible NCCT scans with non-traumatic ICH collected between January 2011 and April 2018. The model's diagnostic performance was compared with clinicians's performance. The clinicians achieve significant improvements in the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnoses of certain hemorrhage etiologies with proposed system augmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-02T08:45:17Z)
CIRCA: comprehensible online system in support of chest X-rays-based COVID-19 diagnosis [37.41181188499616]
Deep learning techniques can help in the faster detection of COVID-19 cases and monitoring of disease progression. Five different datasets were used to construct a representative dataset of 23 799 CXRs for model training. A U-Net-based model was developed to identify a clinically relevant region of the CXR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-11T13:30:34Z)
Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.