FinResearchBench: A Logic Tree based Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation Framework for Financial Research Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16248v3
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 06:53:59 GMT
• Title: FinResearchBench: A Logic Tree based Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation Framework for Financial Research Agents
• Abstract summary: FinResearchBench is a logic tree-based Agent-as-a-Judge and targets specifically for the financial research agents.<n>It provides a comprehensive and automatic assessment of the research agents across 7 key types of tasks in the financial research domain.
• Score: 15.905856417551737
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recently, AI agents are rapidly evolving in intelligence and widely used in professional research applications, such as STEM, software development, and finance. Among these AI agents, deep research agent is a key category as it can perform long-horizon tasks and solve problems of greater complexity. However, there are few evaluation frameworks and benchmarks that systematically and automatically investigate the capabilities of these research agents. In addition, financial research problems have distinct complexity and subtlety. To fill in the gap, we propose FinResearchBench, which is a logic tree-based Agent-as-a-Judge and targets specifically for the financial research agents. It provides a comprehensive and automatic assessment of the research agents across 7 key types of tasks in the financial research domain. The contributions of this work are two-folded: (1) the first and innovative Agent-as-a-Judge system that extracts the logic tree of the research outcome and uses it as the intermediate information to present a comprehensive, reliable, and robust evaluation; (2) finance-oriented that it covers 70 typical financial research questions, spreading across 7 frequently encountered types of task in the domain.

Related papers

• FinanceHarness: Autonomous Financial Deep Research Framework [41.02718376252945]
  FinanceHarness runs finance-oriented tools and practitioner-guided, automated financial deep research end to end.<n>FinanceGym comprises thesis-driven research questions and rubrics that combine pre-cutoff and post-cutoff criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T08:32:04Z)
• Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales [118.2204632627895]
  SciAgentArena is a systematic benchmark for evaluating AI agents in real-world scientific research scenarios.<n>It comprises approximately 200 tasks with stepwise verification and an interactive, agent-agnostic environment for assessing diverse AI agents.<n>We find that current agents can contribute effectively to well-specified data-analysis, particularly when the task structure and evaluation criteria are clear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T22:55:30Z)
• Herculean: An Agentic Benchmark for Financial Intelligence [114.33879935277217]
  We introduce Herculean, the first skilled benchmark for agentic financial intelligence spanning four representative skill sets.<n>Across frontier agents, we find agents perform relatively well on Trading and Market Insights, but struggle substantially on Hedging and Auditing.<n>Overall, our results point to a key gap in current agents in turning financial reasoning into dependable workflow execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T04:30:49Z)
• AutoResearchBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Complex Scientific Literature Discovery [55.70879973230979]
  AutoResearchBench is a benchmark for autonomous scientific literature discovery.<n>Compared to previous benchmarks on agentic web browsing, AutoResearchBench is research-oriented.<n>Even the most powerful LLMs, despite having largely conquered general agentic web-browsing benchmarks such as BrowseComp, achieve only 9.39% accuracy on Deep Research and 9.31% IoU on Wide Research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T06:05:17Z)
• SmartSearch: Process Reward-Guided Query Refinement for Search Agents [63.46067892354375]
  Large language model (LLM)-based search agents have proven promising for addressing knowledge-intensive problems.<n>Existing works largely focus on optimizing the reasoning paradigms of search agents, yet the quality of intermediate search queries during reasoning remains overlooked.<n>We introduce SmartSearch, a framework built upon two key mechanisms to mitigate this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T12:39:05Z)
• AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite [75.58737079136942]
  We present AstaBench, a suite that provides the first holistic measure of agentic ability to perform scientific research.<n>Our suite comes with the first scientific research environment with production-grade search tools.<n>Our evaluation of 57 agents across 22 agent classes reveals several interesting findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T17:10:26Z)
• FinDeepResearch: Evaluating Deep Research Agents in Rigorous Financial Analysis [110.5695516127813]
  HisRubric is a novel evaluation framework with a hierarchical analytical structure and a fine-grained grading rubric.<n>FinDeepResearch is a benchmark that comprises 64 listed companies from 8 financial markets across 4 languages.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on the FinDeepResearch using 16 representative methods, including 6 DR agents, 5 LLMs equipped with both deep reasoning and search capabilities, and 5 LLMs with deep reasoning capabilities only.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T17:21:56Z)
• Enhancing Financial RAG with Agentic AI and Multi-HyDE: A Novel Approach to Knowledge Retrieval and Hallucination Reduction [0.5814806132299305]
  We introduce a framework for financial Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)<n>RAG generates multiple, nonequivalent queries to boost the effectiveness and coverage of retrieval from large, structured financial corpora.<n>Our pipeline is optimized for token efficiency and multi-step financial reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T19:24:30Z)
• FinSearchComp: Towards a Realistic, Expert-Level Evaluation of Financial Search and Reasoning [30.252244345152956]
  FinSearchComp is the first fully open-source benchmark for realistic, open-domain financial search and reasoning.<n>The benchmark includes 635 questions spanning global and Greater China markets.<n>Grok 4 (web) tops the global subset, approaching expert-level accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T15:13:13Z)
• FinAgentBench: A Benchmark Dataset for Agentic Retrieval in Financial Question Answering [57.18367828883773]
  FinAgentBench is a benchmark for evaluating agentic retrieval with multi-step reasoning in finance.<n>The benchmark consists of 26K expert-annotated examples on S&P-500 listed firms.<n>We evaluate a suite of state-of-the-art models and demonstrate how targeted fine-tuning can significantly improve agentic retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T22:15:22Z)
• Cognitive Kernel-Pro: A Framework for Deep Research Agents and Agent Foundation Models Training [67.895981259683]
  General AI Agents are increasingly recognized as foundational frameworks for the next generation of artificial intelligence.<n>Current agent systems are either closed-source or heavily reliant on a variety of paid APIs and proprietary tools.<n>We present Cognitive Kernel-Pro, a fully open-source and (to the maximum extent) free multi-module agent framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T08:11:31Z)
• FinGAIA: A Chinese Benchmark for AI Agents in Real-World Financial Domain [17.682962451679312]
  FinGAIA comprises 407 meticulously crafted tasks, spanning seven major financial sub-domains.<n>The best-performing agent, ChatGPT, achieved an overall accuracy of 48.9%, which, while superior to non-professionals, still lags financial experts by over 35 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T04:19:16Z)
• AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
  We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z)
• Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge [34.672897171399775]
  Agentic search systems autonomously browse the web, synthesize information, and return comprehensive citation-backed answers.<n>Mind2Web 2 is a benchmark of 130 realistic, high-quality, and long-horizon tasks constructed with over 1000 hours of human labor.<n>Our method constructs task-specific judge agents based on a tree-structured design to automatically assess both answer correctness and source attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T17:32:50Z)
• From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents [96.65646344634524]
  Large Language Models (LLMs), endowed with reasoning and agentic capabilities, are ushering in a new paradigm termed Agentic Deep Research.<n>We trace the evolution from static web search to interactive, agent-based systems that plan, explore, and learn.<n>We demonstrate that Agentic Deep Research not only significantly outperforms existing approaches, but is also poised to become the dominant paradigm for future information seeking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T17:27:19Z)
• Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap [79.04813794804377]
  Deep Research (DR) agents are designed to tackle complex, multi-turn informational research tasks.<n>In this paper, we conduct a detailed analysis of the foundational technologies and architectural components that constitute DR agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T16:52:48Z)
• DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents [30.768405850755602]
  DeepResearch Bench is a benchmark consisting of 100 PhD-level research tasks.<n> evaluating Deep Research Agents is inherently complex and labor-intensive.<n>We propose two novel methodologies that achieve strong alignment with human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T13:17:32Z)
• AgentSwift: Efficient LLM Agent Design via Value-guided Hierarchical Search [58.98450205734779]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Existing agent search methods suffer from three major limitations.<n>We introduce a comprehensive framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T12:07:23Z)
• FinDER: Financial Dataset for Question Answering and Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation [63.55583665003167]
  We present FinDER, an expert-generated dataset tailored for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in finance.<n>FinDER focuses on annotating search-relevant evidence by domain experts, offering 5,703 query-evidence-answer triplets.<n>By challenging models to retrieve relevant information from large corpora, FinDER offers a more realistic benchmark for evaluating RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T11:30:13Z)
• FinRobot: AI Agent for Equity Research and Valuation with Large Language Models [6.2474959166074955]
  This paper presents FinRobot, the first AI agent framework specifically designed for equity research. FinRobot employs a multi-agent Chain of Thought (CoT) system, integrating both quantitative and qualitative analyses to emulate the comprehensive reasoning of a human analyst. Unlike existing automated research tools, such as CapitalCube and Wright Reports, FinRobot delivers insights comparable to those produced by major brokerage firms and fundamental research vendors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T17:38:07Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in the Service of Entrepreneurial Finance: Knowledge Structure and the Foundational Algorithmic Paradigm [0.8287206589886879]
  The study provides a bibliometric review of Artificial Intelligence applications in entrepreneurial finance literature. The bibliometric analysis gives a rich insight into the knowledge field's conceptual, intellectual, and social structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T07:58:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.