Dynamic and Generalizable Process Reward Modeling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17849v1
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:17:22 GMT
- Title: Dynamic and Generalizable Process Reward Modeling
- Authors: Zhangyue Yin, Qiushi Sun, Zhiyuan Zeng, Qinyuan Cheng, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang,
- Abstract summary: We propose Dynamic and Generalizable Process Reward Modeling (DG-PRM), which features a reward tree to capture and store fine-grained, multi-dimensional reward criteria.<n> Experimental results show that DG-PRM achieves stunning performance on prevailing benchmarks, significantly boosting model performance across tasks with dense rewards.
- Score: 74.36829922727026
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Process Reward Models (PRMs) are crucial for guiding Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex scenarios by providing dense reward signals. However, existing PRMs primarily rely on heuristic approaches, which struggle with cross-domain generalization. While LLM-as-judge has been proposed to provide generalized rewards, current research has focused mainly on feedback results, overlooking the meaningful guidance embedded within the text. Additionally, static and coarse-grained evaluation criteria struggle to adapt to complex process supervision. To tackle these challenges, we propose Dynamic and Generalizable Process Reward Modeling (DG-PRM), which features a reward tree to capture and store fine-grained, multi-dimensional reward criteria. DG-PRM dynamically selects reward signals for step-wise reward scoring. To handle multifaceted reward signals, we pioneeringly adopt Pareto dominance estimation to identify discriminative positive and negative pairs. Experimental results show that DG-PRM achieves stunning performance on prevailing benchmarks, significantly boosting model performance across tasks with dense rewards. Further analysis reveals that DG-PRM adapts well to out-of-distribution scenarios, demonstrating exceptional generalizability.
Related papers
- Recursive Reward Aggregation [51.552609126905885]
We propose an alternative approach for flexible behavior alignment that eliminates the need to modify the reward function.<n>By introducing an algebraic perspective on Markov decision processes (MDPs), we show that the Bellman equations naturally emerge from the generation and aggregation of rewards.<n>Our approach applies to both deterministic and deterministic settings and seamlessly integrates with value-based and actor-critic algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-11T12:37:20Z) - GRPO-CARE: Consistency-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Reasoning [53.894789613838654]
We introduce SEED-Bench-R1, a benchmark with complex real-world videos requiring balanced perception and reasoning.<n>Using SEED-Bench-R1, we find that standard GRPO, while improving answer accuracy, often reduces logical coherence between reasoning steps and answers, with only a 57.9% consistency rate.<n>We propose GRPO-CARE, a consistency-aware RL framework optimizing both answer correctness and reasoning coherence without explicit supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-19T08:49:13Z) - Intra-Trajectory Consistency for Reward Modeling [67.84522106537274]
We develop an intra-trajectory consistency regularization to enforce that adjacent processes with higher next-token generation probability maintain more consistent rewards.<n>We show that the reward model trained with the proposed regularization induces better DPO-aligned policies and achieves better best-of-N (BON) inference-time verification results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T12:59:14Z) - Reward Reasoning Model [104.39256985858428]
Reward Reasoning Models (RRMs) are designed to execute a deliberate reasoning process before generating final rewards.<n>We implement a reinforcement learning framework that fosters self-evolved reward reasoning capabilities.<n> Notably, RRMs can adaptively exploit test-time compute to further improve reward accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T17:58:03Z) - Entropy-Regularized Process Reward Model [30.279394036823092]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in performing complex multi-step reasoning, yet they continue to struggle with mathematical reasoning.<n>We propose an entropy-regularized process reward model (ER-PRM) that integrates KL-regularized Markov Decision Processes (MDP)<n>Our empirical experiments on the MATH and GSM8K benchmarks demonstrate that ER-PRM consistently outperforms existing process reward models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-15T01:09:23Z) - Let's Reinforce Step by Step [10.65244642965387]
We use Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback to shape model reasoning processes.
Our results show that the fine-grained reward provided by PRM-based methods enhances accuracy on simple mathematical reasoning.
We also show the critical role reward aggregation functions play in model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T01:35:51Z) - Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for
Reasoning [64.27898739929734]
Process-Supervised Reward Model (PRM) furnishes LLMs with step-by-step feedback during the training phase.
We propose a greedy search algorithm that employs the step-level feedback from PRM to optimize the reasoning pathways explored by LLMs.
To explore the versatility of our approach, we develop a novel method to automatically generate step-level reward dataset for coding tasks and observed similar improved performance in the code generation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T05:21:50Z) - Multimodal Reward Shaping for Efficient Exploration in Reinforcement
Learning [8.810296389358134]
IRS modules rely on attendant models or additional memory to record and analyze learning procedures.
We introduce a novel metric entitled Jain's fairness index (JFI) to replace the entropy regularizer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-19T14:04:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.