Learning Individual Intrinsic Reward in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Incorporating Generalized Human Expertise

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18867v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:59:10 GMT
• Title: Learning Individual Intrinsic Reward in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Incorporating Generalized Human Expertise
• Authors: Xuefei Wu, Xiao Yin, Yuanyang Zhu, Chunlin Chen,
• Abstract summary: Efficient exploration in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is a challenging problem when receiving only a team reward.<n>A powerful method to mitigate this issue involves crafting dense individual rewards to guide the agents toward efficient exploration.<n>We propose a novel framework, LIGHT, which can integrate human knowledge into MARL algorithms in an end-to-end manner.
• Score: 6.441011477647557
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Efficient exploration in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is a challenging problem when receiving only a team reward, especially in environments with sparse rewards. A powerful method to mitigate this issue involves crafting dense individual rewards to guide the agents toward efficient exploration. However, individual rewards generally rely on manually engineered shaping-reward functions that lack high-order intelligence, thus it behaves ineffectively than humans regarding learning and generalization in complex problems. To tackle these issues, we combine the above two paradigms and propose a novel framework, LIGHT (Learning Individual Intrinsic reward via Incorporating Generalized Human experTise), which can integrate human knowledge into MARL algorithms in an end-to-end manner. LIGHT guides each agent to avoid unnecessary exploration by considering both individual action distribution and human expertise preference distribution. Then, LIGHT designs individual intrinsic rewards for each agent based on actionable representational transformation relevant to Q-learning so that the agents align their action preferences with the human expertise while maximizing the joint action value. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method over representative baselines regarding performance and better knowledge reusability across different sparse-reward tasks on challenging scenarios.

Related papers

• Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents are not even close to Human Intelligence [25.836584192349907]
  Deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents achieve impressive results in a wide variety of tasks, but they lack zero-shot adaptation capabilities.<n>We introduce HackAtari, a set of task variations of the Arcade Learning Environments.<n>We use it to demonstrate that, contrary to humans, RL agents systematically exhibit huge performance drops on simpler versions of their training tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T20:21:46Z)
• Effective Reward Specification in Deep Reinforcement Learning [2.28438857884398]
  Improper reward specification can result in misaligned agent behavior and inefficient learning.<n>In this thesis, we survey the literature on effective reward specification strategies.<n>We propose original contributions addressing the issue of sample efficiency and alignment in deep reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T04:22:11Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.<n>We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning [60.63173816209543]
  RILe (Reinforced Learning) is a framework that combines the strengths of imitation learning and inverse reinforcement learning to learn a dense reward function efficiently.<n>Our framework produces high-performing policies in high-dimensional tasks where direct imitation fails to replicate complex behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:56:31Z)
• Beyond Joint Demonstrations: Personalized Expert Guidance for Efficient Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [54.40927310957792]
  We introduce a novel concept of personalized expert demonstrations, tailored for each individual agent or, more broadly, each individual type of agent within a heterogeneous team.<n>These demonstrations solely pertain to single-agent behaviors and how each agent can achieve personal goals without encompassing any cooperative elements.<n>We propose an approach that selectively utilizes personalized expert demonstrations as guidance and allows agents to learn to cooperate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T20:11:20Z)
• Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Sub-optimal Experts [56.553106680769474]
  We study the theoretical properties of the class of reward functions that are compatible with a given set of experts. Our results show that the presence of multiple sub-optimal experts can significantly shrink the set of compatible rewards. We analyze a uniform sampling algorithm that results in being minimax optimal whenever the sub-optimal experts' performance level is sufficiently close to the one of the optimal agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T12:39:25Z)
• Collaborative Training of Heterogeneous Reinforcement Learning Agents in Environments with Sparse Rewards: What and When to Share? [7.489793155793319]
  This work focuses on combining information obtained through intrinsic motivation with the aim of having a more efficient exploration and faster learning. Our results reveal different ways in which a collaborative framework with little additional computational cost can outperform an independent learning process without knowledge sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T16:15:51Z)
• Open-Ended Learning Leads to Generally Capable Agents [12.079718607356178]
  We define a universe of tasks within an environment domain and demonstrate the ability to train agents that are capable across this vast space and beyond. The resulting space is exceptionally diverse in terms of the challenges posed to agents, and as such, even measuring the learning progress of an agent is an open research problem. We show that through constructing an open-ended learning process, which dynamically changes the training task distributions and training objectives such that the agent never stops learning, we achieve consistent learning of new behaviours.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-27T13:30:07Z)
• PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
  We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
• Learning to Incentivize Other Learning Agents [73.03133692589532]
  We show how to equip RL agents with the ability to give rewards directly to other agents, using a learned incentive function. Such agents significantly outperform standard RL and opponent-shaping agents in challenging general-sum Markov games. Our work points toward more opportunities and challenges along the path to ensure the common good in a multi-agent future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:12:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.