FedFlex: Federated Learning for Diverse Netflix Recommendations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21115v2
• Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 13:39:23 GMT
• Title: FedFlex: Federated Learning for Diverse Netflix Recommendations
• Authors: Sven Lankester, Gustavo de Carvalho Bertoli, Matias Vizcaino, Emmanuelle Beauxis Aussalet, Manel Slokom,
• Abstract summary: FedFlex is a two-stage framework that combines local, on-device fine-tuning of matrix factorization models (SVD and BPR) with a lightweight Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) re-ranking step to promote diversity.<n>Re-ranking with MMR consistently improved ranking quality (nDCG) across both models, with statistically significant gains, particularly for BPR.<n>Our exit questionnaire responses indicated that most users expressed no clear preference between re-ranked and unprocessed lists, implying that increased diversity did not substantially reduce user satisfaction.
• Score: 0.49295921923394387
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The drive for personalization in recommender systems creates a tension between user privacy and the risk of "filter bubbles". Although federated learning offers a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving recommendations, its impact on diversity remains unclear. We introduce FedFlex, a two-stage framework that combines local, on-device fine-tuning of matrix factorization models (SVD and BPR) with a lightweight Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) re-ranking step to promote diversity. We conducted the first live user study of a federated recommender, collecting behavioral data and feedback during a two-week online deployment. Our results show that FedFlex successfully engages users, with BPR outperforming SVD in click-through rate. Re-ranking with MMR consistently improved ranking quality (nDCG) across both models, with statistically significant gains, particularly for BPR. Diversity effects varied: MMR increased coverage for both models and improved intra-list diversity for BPR, but slightly reduced it for SVD, suggesting different interactions between personalization and diversification across models. Our exit questionnaire responses indicated that most users expressed no clear preference between re-ranked and unprocessed lists, implying that increased diversity did not substantially reduce user satisfaction.

Related papers

• Adaptive Quality-Diversity Trade-offs for Large-Scale Batch Recommendation [14.759906340416828]
  We introduce an efficient algorithm called B-DivRec to adjust the degree of item diversity.<n>This helps enforcing a quality-diversity trade-off throughout the user history.<n>Second, we propose an approach to adaptively tailor the quality-diversity trade-off to the user, so that diversity in recommendations can be enhanced if it leads to positive feedback, and vice-diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T12:20:07Z)
• MMR1: Enhancing Multimodal Reasoning with Variance-Aware Sampling and Open Resources [113.33902847941941]
  Variance-Aware Sampling (VAS) is a data selection strategy guided by Variance Promotion Score (VPS)<n>We release large-scale, carefully curated resources containing 1.6M long CoT cold-start data and 15k RL QA pairs.<n> Experiments across mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of both the curated data and the proposed VAS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:58:29Z)
• Bayesian-Guided Diversity in Sequential Sampling for Recommender Systems [1.675857332621569]
  We propose a novel framework that leverages a multi-objective, contextual sequential sampling strategy.<n>Item selection is guided by Bayesian updates that dynamically adjust scores to optimize diversity.<n> Experiments on a real-world dataset show that our approach significantly improves diversity without sacrificing relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T19:36:02Z)
• Reinforcing Video Reasoning with Focused Thinking [65.85683941058916]
  We propose TW-GRPO, a novel framework that enhances visual reasoning with focused thinking and dense reward granularity.<n>Specifically, we employ a token weighting mechanism that prioritizes tokens with high informational density.<n>We also reformulate RL training by shifting from single-choice to multi-choice QA tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T15:42:19Z)
• Counterfactual Multi-player Bandits for Explainable Recommendation Diversification [7.948416784331374]
  We propose a textbfCounterfactual textbfMulti-player textbfBandits (CMB) method to deliver explainable recommendation diversification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T13:21:39Z)
• Preference Diffusion for Recommendation [50.8692409346126]
  We propose PreferDiff, a tailored optimization objective for DM-based recommenders.<n> PreferDiff transforms BPR into a log-likelihood ranking objective to better capture user preferences.<n>It is the first personalized ranking loss designed specifically for DM-based recommenders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T01:02:04Z)
• Dynamic Fusion Strategies for Federated Multimodal Recommendations [37.52127488593226]
  We propose FedMR, a novel multimodal FedRec framework centered around the Mixing Feature Fusion Module (MFFM)<n>FedMR employs a two-stage process: (1) Server-side centralized multimedia content processing provides rich, shared item context using pre-trained models, mitigating limitations from client sparsity and resource constraints efficiently.<n>The MFFM dynamically adapts these server-provided multimodal representations based on client-specific interaction patterns, effectively tailoring recommendations and resolving heterogeneity in user preferences towards different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:10:09Z)
• Relevance meets Diversity: A User-Centric Framework for Knowledge Exploration through Recommendations [15.143224593682012]
  We propose a novel recommendation strategy that combines relevance and diversity by a copula function. We use diversity as a surrogate of the amount of knowledge obtained by the user while interacting with the system. Our strategy outperforms several state-of-the-art competitors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T13:48:24Z)
• A Preference-oriented Diversity Model Based on Mutual-information in Re-ranking for E-commerce Search [11.49911967350851]
  This paper proposes a Preference-oriented Diversity Model Based on Mutual-information (PODM-MI) PODM-MI consider both accuracy and diversity in the re-ranking process. We have successfully deployed PODM-MI on an e-commerce search platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T13:03:34Z)
• How to Diversify any Personalized Recommender? [0.0]
  We introduce a novel approach to improve the diversity of Top-N recommendations while maintaining accuracy.<n>Our approach employs a user-centric pre-processing strategy aimed at exposing users to a wide array of content categories and topics.<n>Using pre-processed data for training leads to recommender systems achieving performance levels comparable to, and in some cases, better than those trained on original, unmodified data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T15:02:55Z)
• Sequential Recommendation with Controllable Diversification: Representation Degeneration and Diversity [59.24517649169952]
  We argue that the representation degeneration issue is the root cause of insufficient recommendation diversity in existing SR methods. We propose a novel Singular sPectrum sMoothing regularization for Recommendation (SPMRec), which acts as a controllable surrogate to alleviate the degeneration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T02:42:37Z)
• Improving Recommendation System Serendipity Through Lexicase Selection [53.57498970940369]
  We propose a new serendipity metric to measure the presence of echo chambers and homophily in recommendation systems. We then attempt to improve the diversity-preservation qualities of well known recommendation techniques by adopting a parent selection algorithm known as lexicase selection. Our results show that lexicase selection, or a mixture of lexicase selection and ranking, outperforms its purely ranked counterparts in terms of personalization, coverage and our specifically designed serendipity benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T15:37:38Z)
• Dual Personalization on Federated Recommendation [50.4115315992418]
  Federated recommendation is a new Internet service architecture that aims to provide privacy-preserving recommendation services in federated settings. This paper proposes a novel Personalized Federated Recommendation (PFedRec) framework to learn many user-specific lightweight models. We also propose a new dual personalization mechanism to effectively learn fine-grained personalization on both users and items.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:26:07Z)
• Track2Vec: fairness music recommendation with a GPU-free customizable-driven framework [6.2405734957622245]
  Track2Vec is a GPU-free customizable-driven framework for fairness music recommendation. We introduce a metric called Miss Rate - Inverse Ground Truth Frequency (MR-ITF) to measure the fairness. Our model achieves a 4th price ranking in a GPU-free environment on the leaderboard in the EvalRS @ CIKM 2022 challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-29T12:53:09Z)
• Recommendation Systems with Distribution-Free Reliability Guarantees [83.80644194980042]
  We show how to return a set of items rigorously guaranteed to contain mostly good items. Our procedure endows any ranking model with rigorous finite-sample control of the false discovery rate. We evaluate our methods on the Yahoo! Learning to Rank and MSMarco datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T17:49:25Z)
• Choosing the Best of Both Worlds: Diverse and Novel Recommendations through Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning [68.45370492516531]
  We introduce Scalarized Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (SMORL) for the Recommender Systems (RS) setting. SMORL agent augments standard recommendation models with additional RL layers that enforce it to simultaneously satisfy three principal objectives: accuracy, diversity, and novelty of recommendations. Our experimental results on two real-world datasets reveal a substantial increase in aggregate diversity, a moderate increase in accuracy, reduced repetitiveness of recommendations, and demonstrate the importance of reinforcing diversity and novelty as complementary objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T13:22:45Z)
• D2RLIR : an improved and diversified ranking function in interactive recommendation systems based on deep reinforcement learning [0.3058685580689604]
  This paper proposes a deep reinforcement learning based recommendation system by utilizing Actor-Critic architecture. The proposed model is able to generate a diverse while relevance recommendation list based on the user's preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T13:11:29Z)
• On component interactions in two-stage recommender systems [82.38014314502861]
  Two-stage recommenders are used by many online platforms, including YouTube, LinkedIn, and Pinterest. We show that interactions between the ranker and the nominators substantially affect the overall performance. In particular, using a Mixture-of-Experts approach, we train the nominators to specialize on different subsets of the item pool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-28T20:53:23Z)
• Sequential Recommendation with Self-Attentive Multi-Adversarial Network [101.25533520688654]
  We present a Multi-Factor Generative Adversarial Network (MFGAN) for explicitly modeling the effect of context information on sequential recommendation. Our framework is flexible to incorporate multiple kinds of factor information, and is able to trace how each factor contributes to the recommendation decision over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T12:28:59Z)
• Towards Multimodal Response Generation with Exemplar Augmentation and Curriculum Optimization [73.45742420178196]
  We propose a novel multimodal response generation framework with exemplar augmentation and curriculum optimization. Our model achieves significant improvements compared to strong baselines in terms of diversity and relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-26T16:29:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.