Can Language Models Discover Scaling Laws?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21184v2
• Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 14:57:00 GMT
• Title: Can Language Models Discover Scaling Laws?
• Authors: Haowei Lin, Haotian Ye, Wenzheng Feng, Quzhe Huang, Yujun Li, Hubert Lim, Zhengrui Li, Xiangyu Wang, Jianzhu Ma, James Zou, Yitao Liang,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces SLDAgent, an evolution-based agent that co-optimize the scaling law model and the parameters, enabling it to autonomously explore complex relationships between variables.<n>For the first time, we demonstrate that SLDAgent can automatically discover laws that exhibit consistently more accurate extrapolation than their established, human-derived counterparts.
• Score: 57.794209392781845
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Discovering scaling laws for predicting model performance at scale is a fundamental and open-ended challenge, mostly reliant on slow, case specific human experimentation. To investigate the potential for LLMs to automate this process, we collect over 5,000 experiments from existing literature and curate seven diverse scaling law discovery tasks. While existing agents struggle to produce accurate law formulas, this paper introduces SLDAgent, an evolution-based agent that co-optimize the scaling law model and the parameters, enabling it to autonomously explore complex relationships between variables. For the first time, we demonstrates that SLDAgent can automatically discover laws that exhibit consistently more accurate extrapolation than their established, human-derived counterparts across all tasks. Through comprehensive analysis, we elucidate why these discovered laws are superior and verify their practical utility in both pretraining and finetuning applications. This work establishes a new paradigm for agentic scientific discovery, showing that AI systems can understand their own scaling behavior, and can contribute novel and practical knowledge back to the research community.

Related papers

• Detailed balance in large language model-driven agents [1.2687030176231846]
  Large language model (LLM)-driven agents are emerging as a powerful new paradigm for solving complex problems.<n>This Letter proposes a method to estimate the underlying generative directionality of LLMs embedded within agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-10T20:04:23Z)
• AI Agents as Universal Task Solvers [94.49762121230042]
  We show that the optimal speed-up that a universal solver can achieve using past data is tightly related to their algorithmic information.<n>We argue that the key quantity to optimize when scaling reasoning models is time, whose critical role in learning has so far only been indirectly considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T02:17:54Z)
• NewtonBench: Benchmarking Generalizable Scientific Law Discovery in LLM Agents [65.85967483058705]
  Large language models are emerging as powerful tools for scientific law discovery.<n>Existing benchmarks for this task suffer from a fundamental methodological trilemma.<n>We introduce NewtonBench, a benchmark comprising 324 scientific law discovery tasks across 12 physics domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T16:12:11Z)
• SciML Agents: Write the Solver, Not the Solution [69.5021018644143]
  We introduce two new datasets: a diagnostic dataset of adversarial "misleading" problems; and a large-scale benchmark of 1,000 diverse ODE tasks.<n>We evaluate open- and closed-source LLM models along two axes: (i) unguided versus guided prompting with domain-specific knowledge; and (ii) off-the-shelf versus fine-tuned variants.<n>Preliminary results indicate that careful prompting and fine-tuning can yield a specialized LLM agent capable of reliably solving simple ODE problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T02:53:57Z)
• Satori-SWE: Evolutionary Test-Time Scaling for Sample-Efficient Software Engineering [51.7496756448709]
  Language models (LMs) perform well on coding benchmarks but struggle with real-world software engineering tasks.<n>Existing approaches rely on supervised fine-tuning with high-quality data, which is expensive to curate at scale.<n>We propose Test-Time Scaling (EvoScale), a sample-efficient method that treats generation as an evolutionary process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T16:15:36Z)
• Implicit bias produces neural scaling laws in learning curves, from perceptrons to deep networks [12.108234998867337]
  We identify two novel textitdynamical scaling laws that govern how performance evolves as function of different norm-based complexity measures.<n>Our findings are consistent across CNNs, ResNets, and Vision Transformers trained on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100.<n>We provide analytical support using a single-layer perceptron trained with logistic loss, where we derive the new dynamical scaling laws, and we explain them through the implicit bias induced by gradient-based training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T15:13:36Z)
• Neural Scaling Laws Rooted in the Data Distribution [0.0]
  Deep neural networks exhibit empirical neural scaling laws, with error decreasing as a power law with increasing model or data size.<n>We develop a mathematical model intended to describe natural datasets using percolation theory.<n>We test the theory by training regression models on toy datasets derived from percolation theory simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T22:01:38Z)
• Understanding Scaling Laws with Statistical and Approximation Theory for Transformer Neural Networks on Intrinsically Low-dimensional Data [4.481230230086981]
  In deep neural networks, a model's generalization error is often observed to follow a power scaling law dependent both on the model size and the data size. We show that our theory predicts a power law between the generalization error and both the training data size and the network size for transformers. By leveraging low-dimensional data structures under a manifold hypothesis, we are able to explain transformer scaling laws in a way which respects the data geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T01:05:28Z)
• Bayesian scaling laws for in-context learning [85.34114399339741]
  In-context learning (ICL) is a powerful technique for getting language models to perform complex tasks with no training updates.<n>We show that ICL approximates a Bayesian learner, which gives rise to a novel Bayesian scaling law for ICL.<n>Our scaling law matches existing scaling laws in accuracy while also offering interpretable terms for task priors, learning efficiency, and per-example probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T21:45:22Z)
• WorkArena++: Towards Compositional Planning and Reasoning-based Common Knowledge Work Tasks [85.95607119635102]
  Large language models (LLMs) can mimic human-like intelligence.<n>WorkArena++ is designed to evaluate the planning, problem-solving, logical/arithmetic reasoning, retrieval, and contextual understanding abilities of web agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T07:15:49Z)
• Information-Theoretic Foundations for Neural Scaling Laws [20.617552198581024]
  We develop information-theoretic foundations for neural scaling laws. We observe that the optimal relation between data and model size is linear, up to logarithmic factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T02:20:54Z)
• Mental Modeling of Reinforcement Learning Agents by Language Models [14.668006477454616]
  This study empirically examines, for the first time, how well large language models can build a mental model of agents. This research may unveil the potential of leveraging LLMs for elucidating RL agent behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T17:14:45Z)
• A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Laws [11.6055501181235]
  We ask: How will the scaling laws change in the inevitable regime where synthetic data makes its way into the training corpus? We develop a theoretical framework of model collapse through the lens of scaling laws. We discover a wide range of decay phenomena, analyzing loss of scaling, shifted scaling with number of generations, the ''un-learning" of skills, and grokking when mixing human and synthesized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T21:06:34Z)
• Computational Experiments Meet Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey and Perspective [16.08517740276261]
  Computational experiments have emerged as a valuable method for studying complex systems. accurately representing real social systems in Agent-based Modeling (ABM) is challenging due to the diverse and intricate characteristics of humans. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) has been proposed, enabling agents to possess anthropomorphic abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T01:17:46Z)
• In-Context Language Learning: Architectures and Algorithms [73.93205821154605]
  We study ICL through the lens of a new family of model problems we term in context language learning (ICLL) We evaluate a diverse set of neural sequence models on regular ICLL tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T18:59:21Z)
• Interpretability at Scale: Identifying Causal Mechanisms in Alpaca [62.65877150123775]
  We use Boundless DAS to efficiently search for interpretable causal structure in large language models while they follow instructions. Our findings mark a first step toward faithfully understanding the inner-workings of our ever-growing and most widely deployed language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T17:15:40Z)
• An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Compute-Optimal Neural Scaling Laws [24.356906682593532]
  We study the compute-optimal trade-off between model and training data set sizes for large neural networks. Our result suggests a linear relation similar to that supported by the empirical analysis of chinchilla.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-02T18:46:41Z)
• A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Laws [72.8349503901712]
  Large language models with a huge number of parameters, when trained on near internet-sized number of tokens, have been empirically shown to obey neural scaling laws. We propose a statistical model -- a joint generative data model and random feature model -- that captures this neural scaling phenomenology. Key findings are the manner in which the power laws that occur in the statistics of natural datasets are extended by nonlinear random feature maps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-30T15:13:18Z)
• Scaling Laws Under the Microscope: Predicting Transformer Performance from Small Scale Experiments [42.793379799720434]
  We investigate whether scaling laws can be used to accelerate model development. We find that scaling laws emerge at finetuning time in some NLP tasks. For tasks where scaling laws exist, they can be used to predict the performance of larger models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-13T19:13:00Z)
• Improving Classifier Training Efficiency for Automatic Cyberbullying Detection with Feature Density [58.64907136562178]
  We study the effectiveness of Feature Density (FD) using different linguistically-backed feature preprocessing methods. We hypothesise that estimating dataset complexity allows for the reduction of the number of required experiments. The difference in linguistic complexity of datasets allows us to additionally discuss the efficacy of linguistically-backed word preprocessing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:48:28Z)
• SDA: Improving Text Generation with Self Data Augmentation [88.24594090105899]
  We propose to improve the standard maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) paradigm by incorporating a self-imitation-learning phase for automatic data augmentation. Unlike most existing sentence-level augmentation strategies, our method is more general and could be easily adapted to any MLE-based training procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T01:15:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.