Idempotent Equilibrium Analysis of Hybrid Workflow Allocation: A Mathematical Schema for Future Work

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01323v1
• Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 11:28:34 GMT
• Title: Idempotent Equilibrium Analysis of Hybrid Workflow Allocation: A Mathematical Schema for Future Work
• Authors: Faruk Alpay, Bugra Kilictas, Taylan Alpay, Hamdi Alakkad,
• Abstract summary: Large-scale AI systems are reshaping how work is divided between people and machines.<n>We formalise this reallocation as an iterated task-delegation map and show that the process converges to a stable idempotent equilibrium.<n>We argue that policies which promote "centaur" human-AI teaming can steer the economy toward the welfare-maximising fixed point.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid advance of large-scale AI systems is reshaping how work is divided between people and machines. We formalise this reallocation as an iterated task-delegation map and show that--under broad, empirically grounded assumptions--the process converges to a stable idempotent equilibrium in which every task is performed by the agent (human or machine) with enduring comparative advantage. Leveraging lattice-theoretic fixed-point tools (Tarski and Banach), we (i) prove existence of at least one such equilibrium and (ii) derive mild monotonicity conditions that guarantee uniqueness. In a stylised continuous model the long-run automated share takes the closed form $x^* = \alpha / (\alpha + \beta)$, where $\alpha$ captures the pace of automation and $\beta$ the rate at which new, human-centric tasks appear; hence full automation is precluded whenever $\beta > 0$. We embed this analytic result in three complementary dynamical benchmarks--a discrete linear update, an evolutionary replicator dynamic, and a continuous Beta-distributed task spectrum--each of which converges to the same mixed equilibrium and is reproducible from the provided code-free formulas. A 2025-to-2045 simulation calibrated to current adoption rates projects automation rising from approximately 10% of work to approximately 65%, leaving a persistent one-third of tasks to humans. We interpret that residual as a new profession of workflow conductor: humans specialise in assigning, supervising and integrating AI modules rather than competing with them. Finally, we discuss implications for skill development, benchmark design and AI governance, arguing that policies which promote "centaur" human-AI teaming can steer the economy toward the welfare-maximising fixed point.

Related papers

• Discovery of Fatigue Strength Models via Feature Engineering and automated eXplainable Machine Learning applied to the welded Transverse Stiffener [0.0]
  This research introduces a unified approach combining Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) with Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)<n>It integrates expert-driven feature engineering with algorithmic feature creation to enhance accuracy and explainability.<n>It bridges data-driven modeling with engineering validation, enabling AI-assisted design and assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T21:57:12Z)
• Scalable, Symbiotic, AI and Non-AI Agent Based Parallel Discrete Event Simulations [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel parallel discrete event simulation (PDES) based methodology to combine multiple AI and non-AI agents.<n>We evaluate our approach by solving four problems from four different domains and comparing the results with those from AI models alone.<n>Results show that overall accuracy of our approach is 68% where as the accuracy of vanilla models is less than 23%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:50:01Z)
• FLARE: Robot Learning with Implicit World Modeling [87.81846091038676]
  $textbfFLARE$ integrates predictive latent world modeling into robot policy learning.<n>$textbfFLARE$ achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming prior policy learning baselines by up to 26%.<n>Our results establish $textbfFLARE$ as a general and scalable approach for combining implicit world modeling with high-frequency robotic control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T15:33:27Z)
• SkillFlow: Efficient Skill and Code Transfer Through Communication in Adapting AI Agents [1.249418440326334]
  SkillFlow is a technology-agnostic framework that allows agents to expand their functionality in an ad-hoc fashion.<n>We show that SkillFlow's ability to accelerate task completion and lead to lower cumulative costs in a real-world application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T16:33:24Z)
• Will Neural Scaling Laws Activate Jevons' Paradox in AI Labor Markets? A Time-Varying Elasticity of Substitution (VES) Analysis [0.0]
  We analyze whether neural scaling laws in artificial intelligence will activate Jevons' Paradox in labor markets.<n>We establish analytical conditions under which AI systems transition from complementing to substituting for human labor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T16:55:30Z)
• Principal-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Orchestrating AI Agents with Contracts [20.8288955218712]
  We propose a framework where a principal guides an agent in a Markov Decision Process (MDP) using a series of contracts. We present and analyze a meta-algorithm that iteratively optimize the policies of the principal and agent. We then scale our algorithm with deep Q-learning and analyze its convergence in the presence of approximation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T14:28:58Z)
• REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and human preferences can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world.<n>Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences.<n>We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• An Empirical Study of Multimodal Model Merging [148.48412442848795]
  Model merging is a technique that fuses multiple models trained on different tasks to generate a multi-task solution. We conduct our study for a novel goal where we can merge vision, language, and cross-modal transformers of a modality-specific architecture. We propose two metrics that assess the distance between weights to be merged and can serve as an indicator of the merging outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T15:43:21Z)
• Efficient Model-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Optimistic Equilibrium Computation [93.52573037053449]
  H-MARL (Hallucinated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning) learns successful equilibrium policies after a few interactions with the environment. We demonstrate our approach experimentally on an autonomous driving simulation benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:24:03Z)
• Learning Dynamic Mechanisms in Unknown Environments: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [123.55983746427572]
  We propose novel learning algorithms to recover the dynamic Vickrey-Clarke-Grove (VCG) mechanism over multiple rounds of interaction.<n>A key contribution of our approach is incorporating reward-free online Reinforcement Learning (RL) to aid exploration over a rich policy space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T16:17:23Z)
• Inducing Equilibria via Incentives: Simultaneous Design-and-Play Finds Global Optima [114.31577038081026]
  We propose an efficient method that tackles the designer's and agents' problems simultaneously in a single loop. Although the designer does not solve the equilibrium problem repeatedly, it can anticipate the overall influence of the incentives on the agents. We prove that the algorithm converges to the global optima at a sublinear rate for a broad class of games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T06:53:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.