Will Neural Scaling Laws Activate Jevons' Paradox in AI Labor Markets? A Time-Varying Elasticity of Substitution (VES) Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05816v2
• Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 19:11:42 GMT
• Title: Will Neural Scaling Laws Activate Jevons' Paradox in AI Labor Markets? A Time-Varying Elasticity of Substitution (VES) Analysis
• Abstract summary: We analyze whether neural scaling laws in artificial intelligence will activate Jevons' Paradox in labor markets.<n>We establish analytical conditions under which AI systems transition from complementing to substituting for human labor.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We develop a formal economic framework to analyze whether neural scaling laws in artificial intelligence will activate Jevons' Paradox in labor markets, potentially leading to increased AI adoption and human labor substitution. By using a time-varying elasticity of substitution (VES) approach, we establish analytical conditions under which AI systems transition from complementing to substituting for human labor. Our model formalizes four interconnected mechanisms: (1) exponential growth in computational capacity ($C(t) = C(0) \cdot e^{g \cdot t}$); (2) logarithmic scaling of AI capabilities with computation ($\sigma(t) = \delta \cdot \ln(C(t)/C(0))$); (3) declining AI prices ($p_A(t) = p_A(0) \cdot e^{-d \cdot t}$); and (4) a resulting compound effect parameter ($\phi = \delta \cdot g$) that governs market transformation dynamics. We identify five distinct phases of AI market penetration, demonstrating that complete market transformation requires the elasticity of substitution to exceed unity ($\sigma > 1$), with the timing determined primarily by the compound parameter $\phi$ rather than price competition alone. These findings provide an analytical framing for evaluating industry claims about AI substitution effects, especially on the role of quality versus price in the technological transition.

Related papers

• Civilizational Metamaterials: Engineering Coordination Under Capability Gradients and Structural Turbulence [0.0]
  We argue that governance must transition from a normative discipline to an engineering discipline.<n>We develop a formal framework, inspired by the physics of metamaterials, to make this transition quantitative and testable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T18:10:00Z)
• The Novelty Bottleneck: A Framework for Understanding Human Effort Scaling in AI-Assisted Work [4.726153739634646]
  We propose a model of human-AI collaboration that isolates a mechanism we call the novelty bottleneck.<n>The model assumes that tasks decompose into atomic decisions, a fraction $$ of which are "novel"<n>Our contribution is not a proof that human effort must scale linearly, but a framework that identifies the novelty fraction as the key parameter governing AI-assisted productivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T22:50:13Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Systemic Risk: A Unified Model of Performative Prediction, Algorithmic Herding, and Cognitive Dependency in Financial Markets [0.7016842616745783]
  We develop a unified model in which AI adoption in financial markets generates systemic risk through three mutually reinforcing channels.<n>The model implies tail-loss amplification of 18--54%, economically significant relative to Basel III countercyclical buffers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T06:47:55Z)
• Wiener Chaos Expansion based Neural Operator for Singular Stochastic Partial Differential Equations [58.188204772101756]
  This paper explores how our recently developed Wiener Chaos Expansion (WCE)-based neural operator (NO) can be applied to singular partial differential equations.<n>We leverage feature-wise linear modulation (FiLM) to appropriately capture the dependency between the solution of singular SPDE and its smooth remainder.<n>The resulting WCE-FiLM-NO shows excellent performance on $boldsymbol4$, as measured by relative $L$ loss, out-of-distribution and autocorrelation score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T10:50:30Z)
• When AI Levels the Playing Field: Skill Homogenization, Asset Concentration, and Two Regimes of Inequality [0.7016842616745783]
  Generative AI compresses within-task skill differences while shifting economic value toward concentrated complementary assets.<n>We formalize this tension in a task-based model with endogenous education, employer screening, and heterogeneous firms.<n>The model yields two regimes whose boundary depends on AI's technology structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T12:41:08Z)
• Generative AI as a Non-Convex Supply Shock: Market Bifurcation and Welfare Analysis [4.887749221165767]
  We show how the GenAI cost shock reshapes the market into exit AI, and human segments, generating a -class hollow'' output.<n>We conclude that optimal governance must be toward laissez-faire congestion management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T17:00:40Z)
• A Sustainable AI Economy Needs Data Deals That Work for Generators [56.949279542190084]
  We argue that the machine learning value chain is structurally unsustainable due to an economic data processing inequality.<n>We analyze 73 public data deals and show that the majority of value accrues to aggregators.<n>We propose an Equitable Data-Value Exchange Framework to enable a minimal market that benefits all participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T01:05:48Z)
• Governance of Technological Transition: A Predator-Prey Analysis of AI Capital in China's Economy and Its Policy Implications [7.7994612323406765]
  The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence into China's economy presents a classic governance challenge.<n>This study addresses this policy dilemma by modeling the dynamic interactions between AI capital, physical capital, and labor.<n>Our results reveal a consistent pattern where AI capital acts as the 'prey', stimulating both physical capital accumulation and labor compensation (wage bill)<n>The sensitivity analysis shows that the labor market equilibrium is overwhelmingly driven by AI-related parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T03:30:46Z)
• A Theory of Information, Variation, and Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  A growing body of empirical work suggests that the widespread adoption of generative AI produces a significant homogenizing effect on information, creativity, and cultural production.<n>This paper argues that the very homogenization that flattens knowledge within specialized domains simultaneously renders that knowledge into consistent modules that can be recombined across them.<n>The paper concludes by outlining the cognitive and institutional scaffolds required to resolve this tension, arguing they are the decisive variable that determine whether generative AI becomes an instrument of innovation or homogenization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T16:21:13Z)
• Idempotent Equilibrium Analysis of Hybrid Workflow Allocation: A Mathematical Schema for Future Work [0.0]
  Large-scale AI systems are reshaping how work is divided between people and machines.<n>We formalise this reallocation as an iterated task-delegation map and show that the process converges to a stable idempotent equilibrium.<n>We argue that policies which promote "centaur" human-AI teaming can steer the economy toward the welfare-maximising fixed point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T11:28:34Z)
• Shifting AI Efficiency From Model-Centric to Data-Centric Compression [67.45087283924732]
  We argue that the focus of research for AI is shifting from model-centric compression to data-centric compression.<n>Data-centric compression improves AI efficiency by directly compressing the volume of data processed during model training or inference.<n>Our work aims to provide a novel perspective on AI efficiency, synthesize existing efforts, and catalyze innovation to address the challenges posed by ever-increasing context lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T13:51:17Z)
• An AI Capability Threshold for Rent-Funded Universal Basic Income in an AI-Automated Economy [2.6451153531057985]
  We derive the first closed-form condition under which AI capital profits could sustainably finance a universal basic income.<n>We analyze how the AI capability threshold--defined as the productivity level of AI relative to pre-AI automation--varies under different economic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T13:08:13Z)
• Transfer Faster, Price Smarter: Minimax Dynamic Pricing under Cross-Market Preference Shift [5.471147654736597]
  We study contextual dynamic pricing when a target market can leverage K auxiliary markets.<n>We propose Cross-Market Transfer Dynamic Pricing (CM-TDP), the first algorithm that provably handles such model-shift transfer.<n>By bridging transfer learning, robust aggregation, and revenue optimization, CM-TDP moves toward pricing systems that transfer faster, price smarter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T18:18:17Z)
• FLARE: Robot Learning with Implicit World Modeling [87.81846091038676]
  $textbfFLARE$ integrates predictive latent world modeling into robot policy learning.<n>$textbfFLARE$ achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming prior policy learning baselines by up to 26%.<n>Our results establish $textbfFLARE$ as a general and scalable approach for combining implicit world modeling with high-frequency robotic control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T15:33:27Z)
• Complement or substitute? How AI increases the demand for human skills [0.0]
  This paper examines whether artificial intelligence (AI) acts as a substitute or complement to human labour.<n>It draws on 12 million online job vacancies from the United States spanning 2018-2023.<n>Results show that AI-focused roles are nearly twice as likely to require skills like resilience, agility, or analytical thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-27T17:26:30Z)
• Societal Adaptation to AI Human-Labor Automation [0.0]
  This paper analyzes how society can adapt to AI-driven human-labor automation.<n>The threat model is centered on mass unemployment and its socioeconomic consequences.<n>The analysis explores both "capability-modifying interventions" (CMIs) that shape how AI develops, and "adaptation interventions" (ADIs) that help society adjust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T15:08:11Z)
• Boardwalk Empire: How Generative AI is Revolutionizing Economic Paradigms [0.0]
  Deep generative models, an integration of generative and deep learning techniques, excel in creating new data beyond analyzing existing ones. By automating design, optimization, and innovation cycles, Generative AI is reshaping core industrial processes. In the financial sector, it is transforming risk assessment, trading strategies, and forecasting, demonstrating its profound impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T20:57:16Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• The Dual Imperative: Innovation and Regulation in the AI Era [0.0]
  This article addresses the societal costs associated with the lack of regulation in Artificial Intelligence. Over fifty years of AI research, have propelled AI into the mainstream, promising significant economic benefits. The discourse is polarized between accelerationists, advocating for unfettered technological advancement, and doomers, calling for a slowdown to prevent dystopian outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:26:25Z)
• Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups [0.0]
  This paper explores the relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI) It argues that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation. The paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T22:40:07Z)
• Transformers as Support Vector Machines [54.642793677472724]
  We establish a formal equivalence between the optimization geometry of self-attention and a hard-margin SVM problem. We characterize the implicit bias of 1-layer transformers optimized with gradient descent. We believe these findings inspire the interpretation of transformers as a hierarchy of SVMs that separates and selects optimal tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T17:57:50Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Bayesian Bilinear Neural Network for Predicting the Mid-price Dynamics in Limit-Order Book Markets [84.90242084523565]
  Traditional time-series econometric methods often appear incapable of capturing the true complexity of the multi-level interactions driving the price dynamics. By adopting a state-of-the-art second-order optimization algorithm, we train a Bayesian bilinear neural network with temporal attention. By addressing the use of predictive distributions to analyze errors and uncertainties associated with the estimated parameters and model forecasts, we thoroughly compare our Bayesian model with traditional ML alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-07T18:59:54Z)
• Finding General Equilibria in Many-Agent Economic Simulations Using Deep Reinforcement Learning [72.23843557783533]
  We show that deep reinforcement learning can discover stable solutions that are epsilon-Nash equilibria for a meta-game over agent types. Our approach is more flexible and does not need unrealistic assumptions, e.g., market clearing. We demonstrate our approach in real-business-cycle models, a representative family of DGE models, with 100 worker-consumers, 10 firms, and a government who taxes and redistributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-03T17:00:17Z)
• The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learning [126.37520136341094]
  We show that machine-learning-based economic simulation is a powerful policy and mechanism design framework. The AI Economist is a two-level, deep RL framework that trains both agents and a social planner who co-adapt. In simple one-step economies, the AI Economist recovers the optimal tax policy of economic theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T17:42:35Z)
• Online Learning of Competitive Equilibria in Exchange Economies [94.24357018178867]
  In economics, the sharing of scarce resources among multiple rational agents is a classical problem. We propose an online learning mechanism to learn agent preferences. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this mechanism through numerical simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T21:32:17Z)
• Learning from Learning Machines: Optimisation, Rules, and Social Norms [91.3755431537592]
  It appears that the area of AI that is most analogous to the behaviour of economic entities is that of morally good decision-making. Recent successes of deep learning for AI suggest that more implicit specifications work better than explicit ones for solving such problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-29T17:42:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.