LLM-based IR-system for Bank Supervisors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02945v1
• Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 23:02:01 GMT
• Title: LLM-based IR-system for Bank Supervisors
• Authors: Ilias Aarab,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel Information Retrieval (IR) System tailored to assist supervisors in drafting both consistent and effective measures.<n>It ingests findings from on-site investigations and retrieves the most relevant historical findings and their associated measures from a comprehensive database.<n>The final model achieves a Mean Average Precision (MAP@100) of 0.83 and a Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR@100) of 0.92.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Bank supervisors face the complex task of ensuring that new measures are consistently aligned with historical precedents. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel Information Retrieval (IR) System tailored to assist supervisors in drafting both consistent and effective measures. This system ingests findings from on-site investigations. It then retrieves the most relevant historical findings and their associated measures from a comprehensive database, providing a solid basis for supervisors to write well-informed measures for new findings. Utilizing a blend of lexical, semantic, and Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) fuzzy set matching techniques, the IR system ensures the retrieval of findings that closely align with current cases. The performance of this system, particularly in scenarios with partially labeled data, is validated through a Monte Carlo methodology, showcasing its robustness and accuracy. Enhanced by a Transformer-based Denoising AutoEncoder for fine-tuning, the final model achieves a Mean Average Precision (MAP@100) of 0.83 and a Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR@100) of 0.92. These scores surpass those of both standalone lexical models such as BM25 and semantic BERT-like models.

Related papers

• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• Scalable Unit Harmonization in Medical Informatics via Bayesian-Optimized Retrieval and Transformer-Based Re-ranking [0.14504054468850663]
  We develop a scalable methodology for harmonizing inconsistent units in large-scale clinical datasets.<n>We implement a multi-stage pipeline: filtering, identification, harmonization proposal generation, automated re-ranking, and manual validation.<n>The system achieved 83.39% precision at rank 1 and 94.66% recall at rank 5.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:09:15Z)
• RAAD-LLM: Adaptive Anomaly Detection Using LLMs and RAG Integration [2.879328762187361]
  We present RAAD-LLM, a novel framework for adaptive anomaly detection.<n>By effectively utilizing domain-specific knowledge, RAAD-LLM enhances the detection of anomalies in time series data.<n>Results show significant improvements over our previous model with an accuracy increase from 70.7% to 88.6% on the real-world dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T17:20:43Z)
• Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
  I propose a novel Comparative RAG system that introduces an evaluator module to bridge the gap between probabilistic RAG systems and deterministically verifiable responses.<n>This framework paves the way for more reliable and scalable question-answering applications in domains requiring high precision and verifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:52:06Z)
• Revisiting BPR: A Replicability Study of a Common Recommender System Baseline [78.00363373925758]
  We study the features of the BPR model, indicating their impact on its performance, and investigate open-source BPR implementations. Our analysis reveals inconsistencies between these implementations and the original BPR paper, leading to a significant decrease in performance of up to 50% for specific implementations. We show that the BPR model can achieve performance levels close to state-of-the-art methods on the top-n recommendation tasks and even outperform them on specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T18:39:53Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Enhancing Microgrid Performance Prediction with Attention-based Deep Learning Models [0.0]
  This research aims to address microgrid systems' operational challenges, characterized by power oscillations that contribute to grid instability. An integrated strategy is proposed, leveraging the strengths of convolutional and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) layers. The framework is anchored by a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model, which is tasked with comprehensive load forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T21:24:11Z)
• Comparing Hyper-optimized Machine Learning Models for Predicting Efficiency Degradation in Organic Solar Cells [38.647921189039934]
  This work presents a set of optimal machine learning (ML) models to represent the temporal degradation suffered by the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic solar cells (OSCs)<n>We generated a database with 996 entries, which includes up to 7 variables regarding both the manufacturing process and environmental conditions for more than 180 days.<n>The accuracy achieved reaches values of the coefficient determination (R2) widely exceeding 0.90, whereas the root mean squared error (RMSE), sum of squared error (SSE), and mean absolute error (MAE)>1% of the target value, the PCE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T22:05:26Z)
• Test-Time Adaptation Induces Stronger Accuracy and Agreement-on-the-Line [65.14099135546594]
  Recent test-time adaptation (TTA) methods drastically strengthen the ACL and AGL trends in models, even in shifts where models showed very weak correlations before. Our results show that by combining TTA with AGL-based estimation methods, we can estimate the OOD performance of models with high precision for a broader set of distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T23:21:25Z)
• Relational Action Bases: Formalization, Effective Safety Verification, and Invariants (Extended Version) [67.99023219822564]
  We introduce the general framework of relational action bases (RABs) RABs generalize existing models by lifting both restrictions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a benchmark of data-aware business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-12T17:03:50Z)
• TTRS: Tinkoff Transactions Recommender System benchmark [62.997667081978825]
  We present the TTRS - Tinkoff Transactions Recommender System benchmark. This financial transaction benchmark contains over 2 million interactions between almost 10,000 users and more than 1,000 merchant brands over 14 months. We also present a comprehensive comparison of the current popular RecSys methods on the next-period recommendation task and conduct a detailed analysis of their performance against various metrics and recommendation goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T20:04:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.