Empathy Guidelines for Improving Practitioner Well-being & Software Engineering Practices

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03846v1
• Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 18:44:12 GMT
• Title: Empathy Guidelines for Improving Practitioner Well-being & Software Engineering Practices
• Authors: Hashini Gunatilake, John Grundy, Rashina Hoda, Ingo Mueller,
• Abstract summary: Empathy is a powerful yet often overlooked element in software engineering (SE)<n>This paper introduces 17 actionable empathy guidelines designed to support practitioners, teams, and organisations.
• Score: 10.307654003138401
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Empathy is a powerful yet often overlooked element in software engineering (SE), supporting better teamwork, smoother communication, and effective decision-making. In our previous study, we identified a range of practitioner strategies for fostering empathy in SE contexts. Building on these insights, this paper introduces 17 actionable empathy guidelines designed to support practitioners, teams, and organisations. We also explore how these guidelines can be implemented in practice by examining real-world applications, challenges, and strategies to overcome them shared by software practitioners. To support adoption, we present a visual prioritisation framework that categorises the guidelines based on perceived importance, ease of implementation, and willingness to adopt. The findings offer practical and flexible suggestions for integrating empathy into everyday SE work, helping teams move from principles to sustainable action.

Related papers

• Modelling Interrelations Between Agile Practices: The Agile Map [2.2044574002571182]
  The Agile Map is a theoretical model describing relations between agile practices.<n>The model aims to support practitioners in selecting and combining agile practices in a meaningful way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T04:28:37Z)
• Feature-Based vs. GAN-Based Learning from Demonstrations: When and Why [50.191655141020505]
  This survey provides a comparative analysis of feature-based and GAN-based approaches to learning from demonstrations.<n>We argue that the dichotomy between feature-based and GAN-based methods is increasingly nuanced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T11:45:51Z)
• Exploring Empathy in Software Engineering: Insights from a Grey Literature Analysis of Practitioners' Perspectives [0.798734008619224]
  Empathy, a key social skill, is essential for communication and collaboration in SE but remains an under-researched topic.<n>This study investigates empathy in SE from practitioners' perspectives, aiming to characterize its meaning, identify barriers, discuss practices to overcome them, and explore its effects.<n>The study proposes a definition of empathy in SE, identifies barriers such as toxic culture and excessive technical focus, practices to foster empathy in teams, and outcomes, including improved collaboration, communication, and reduced anxiety, frustration, and stress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:35:37Z)
• IntentionESC: An Intention-Centered Framework for Enhancing Emotional Support in Dialogue Systems [74.0855067343594]
  In emotional support conversations, unclear intentions can lead supporters to employ inappropriate strategies.<n>We propose the Intention-centered Emotional Support Conversation framework.<n>It defines the possible intentions of supporters, identifies key emotional state aspects for inferring these intentions, and maps them to appropriate support strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T10:14:49Z)
• Responsible AI in the Software Industry: A Practitioner-Centered Perspective [0.0]
  This study explores the practices and challenges faced by software practitioners in aligning with Responsible AI principles.<n>Our findings reveal that while practitioners frequently address fairness, inclusiveness, and reliability, principles such as transparency and accountability receive comparatively less attention in their practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T15:57:13Z)
• Learning to Assist Humans without Inferring Rewards [65.28156318196397]
  We build upon prior work that studies assistance through the lens of empowerment.<n>An assistive agent aims to maximize the influence of the human's actions.<n>We prove that these representations estimate a similar notion of empowerment to that studied by prior work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:31:04Z)
• Demystifying Large Language Models for Medicine: A Primer [50.83806796466396]
  Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative class of AI tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare. This tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T15:41:56Z)
• APTNESS: Incorporating Appraisal Theory and Emotion Support Strategies for Empathetic Response Generation [71.26755736617478]
  Empathetic response generation is designed to comprehend the emotions of others. We develop a framework that combines retrieval augmentation and emotional support strategy integration. Our framework can enhance the empathy ability of LLMs from both cognitive and affective empathy perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T02:23:37Z)
• Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges [2.5788518098820337]
  A plethora of frameworks and guidelines have appeared to support practitioners in implementing Trustworthy AI applications. We study the vision AI practitioners have on TAI principles, how they address them, and what they would like to have. We highlight recommendations to help AI practitioners develop Trustworthy AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T13:02:46Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• Principles to Practices for Responsible AI: Closing the Gap [0.1749935196721634]
  We argue that an impact assessment framework is a promising approach to close the principles-to-practices gap. We review a case study of AI's use in forest ecosystem restoration, demonstrating how an impact assessment framework can translate into effective and responsible AI practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T16:04:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.