Dynamic User-controllable Privacy-preserving Few-shot Sensing Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03989v1
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:44:11 GMT
• Title: Dynamic User-controllable Privacy-preserving Few-shot Sensing Framework
• Authors: Ajesh Koyatan Chathoth, Shuhao Yu, Stephen Lee,
• Abstract summary: PrivCLIP is a user-controllable, few-shot privacy-preserving sensing framework.<n>PrivCLIP allows users to specify and modify their privacy preferences by categorizing activities as sensitive (black-listed), non-sensitive (white-listed), or neutral (gray-listed)
• Score: 0.589889361990138
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: User-controllable privacy is important in modern sensing systems, as privacy preferences can vary significantly from person to person and may evolve over time. This is especially relevant in devices equipped with Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors, such as smartphones and wearables, which continuously collect rich time-series data that can inadvertently expose sensitive user behaviors. While prior work has proposed privacy-preserving methods for sensor data, most rely on static, predefined privacy labels or require large quantities of private training data, limiting their adaptability and user agency. In this work, we introduce PrivCLIP, a dynamic, user-controllable, few-shot privacy-preserving sensing framework. PrivCLIP allows users to specify and modify their privacy preferences by categorizing activities as sensitive (black-listed), non-sensitive (white-listed), or neutral (gray-listed). Leveraging a multimodal contrastive learning approach, PrivCLIP aligns IMU sensor data with natural language activity descriptions in a shared embedding space, enabling few-shot detection of sensitive activities. When a privacy-sensitive activity is identified, the system uses a language-guided activity sanitizer and a motion generation module (IMU-GPT) to transform the original data into a privacy-compliant version that semantically resembles a non-sensitive activity. We evaluate PrivCLIP on multiple human activity recognition datasets and demonstrate that it significantly outperforms baseline methods in terms of both privacy protection and data utility.

Related papers

• Inference Privacy: Properties and Mechanisms [8.471466670802817]
  Inference Privacy (IP) can allow a user to interact with a model while providing a rigorous privacy guarantee for the users' data at inference.<n>We present two types of mechanisms for achieving IP: namely, input perturbations and output perturbations which are customizable by the users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T20:47:28Z)
• FT-PrivacyScore: Personalized Privacy Scoring Service for Machine Learning Participation [4.772368796656325]
  In practice, controlled data access remains a mainstream method for protecting data privacy in many industrial and research environments. We developed the demo prototype FT-PrivacyScore to show that it's possible to efficiently and quantitatively estimate the privacy risk of participating in a model fine-tuning task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T02:41:26Z)
• Activity Recognition on Avatar-Anonymized Datasets with Masked Differential Privacy [64.32494202656801]
  Privacy-preserving computer vision is an important emerging problem in machine learning and artificial intelligence.<n>We present anonymization pipeline that replaces sensitive human subjects in video datasets with synthetic avatars within context.<n>We also proposeMaskDP to protect non-anonymized but privacy sensitive background information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:22:53Z)
• Protecting Activity Sensing Data Privacy Using Hierarchical Information Dissociation [8.584570228761503]
  Smartphones and wearable devices have been integrated into our daily lives, offering personalized services. Many apps become overprivileged as their collected sensing data contains unnecessary sensitive information. Existing methods must obtain private labels and users need to specify privacy policies. We present Hippo to dissociate hierarchical information including private metadata and multi-grained activity information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T15:38:00Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• Privacy Preserving Large Language Models: ChatGPT Case Study Based Vision and Framework [6.828884629694705]
  This article proposes the conceptual model called PrivChatGPT, a privacy-generative model for LLMs. PrivChatGPT consists of two main components i.e., preserving user privacy during the data curation/pre-processing together with preserving private context and the private training process for large-scale data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:55:13Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• SPAct: Self-supervised Privacy Preservation for Action Recognition [73.79886509500409]
  Existing approaches for mitigating privacy leakage in action recognition require privacy labels along with the action labels from the video dataset. Recent developments of self-supervised learning (SSL) have unleashed the untapped potential of the unlabeled data. We present a novel training framework which removes privacy information from input video in a self-supervised manner without requiring privacy labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T02:56:40Z)
• Partial sensitivity analysis in differential privacy [58.730520380312676]
  We investigate the impact of each input feature on the individual's privacy loss. We experimentally evaluate our approach on queries over private databases. We also explore our findings in the context of neural network training on synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T08:29:16Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.