Shaping a Profession, Building a Community: A Practitioner-Led Investigation of Public Interest Technologists in Civil Society

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07230v1
• Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 08:15:30 GMT
• Title: Shaping a Profession, Building a Community: A Practitioner-Led Investigation of Public Interest Technologists in Civil Society
• Authors: Mallory Knodel, Mallika Balakrishnan, Lauren M. Chambers,
• Abstract summary: Public interest technology (PIT) is growing in popularity among technical practitioners working in civil society and nonprofit organizations.<n>This paper describes a mixed-methods study that characterizes technologists within the specific context of civil society, civil rights, and advocacy organizations in North America and Western Europe.
• Score: 0.4779196219827508
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The label `public interest technology' (PIT) is growing in popularity among those seeking to use `tech for good' - especially among technical practitioners working in civil society and nonprofit organizations. PIT encompasses a broad range of sociotechnical work across professional domains and sectors; however, the trend remains understudied within sociotechnical research. This paper describes a mixed-methods study, designed and conducted by PIT practitioners at the Center for Democracy and Technology, that characterizes technologists within the specific context of civil society, civil rights, and advocacy organizations in North America and Western Europe. We conducted interviews with civil society leaders to investigate how PIT practitioners position the field and themselves, and we held a roundtable discussion bringing diverse voices together to make meaning of this growing phenomenon. Ultimately, we find that PIT remains both defined and plagued by its expansiveness, and that today's civil society public interest technologists see a need for both (a) more robust professionalization infrastructures, including philanthropic attention, and (b) more engaged, coherent community. This study illuminates a nascent intersection of technology and policy on-the-ground that is of growing relevance to critical sociotechnical research on the shifting relationship between computing and society.

Related papers

• Public Technologies Transforming Work of the Public and the Public Sector [20.810516825243116]
  We focus on a digital platform called OneStop which is deployed by several building departments across the U.S. OneStop aims to integrate various steps and services into a single point of online contact between public sector employees and the public. We observe a multifaceted perspective and experience caused by the adoption of OneStop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:54:31Z)
• Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questions [67.60397632819202]
  Building socially-intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal research goal. We identify a set of underlying technical challenges and open questions for researchers across computing communities to advance Social-AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T02:57:42Z)
• Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical Futures [3.909878683245887]
  Information retrieval research must understand and contend with the social implications of the technology it produces.<n>The community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T17:43:08Z)
• Open Source Software Field Research: Spanning Social and Practice Networks for Re-Entering the Field [2.668565733115187]
  Sociotechnical research increasingly includes the social sub-networks that emerge from large-scale sociotechnical infrastructure. This paper focuses on how researchers can best span adjacent social sub-networks during engaged field research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T23:21:16Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• Application of Text Analytics in Public Service Co-Creation: Literature Review and Research Framework [68.8204255655161]
  An alternative to the traditional top-down development of public services is co-creation of public services. Co-creation promotes collaboration between stakeholders with the aim to create better public services and achieve public values. We study existing works on the application of Text Analytics (TA) techniques on text data to support public service co-creation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T17:34:17Z)
• Responsible and Inclusive Technology Framework: A Formative Framework to Promote Societal Considerations in Information Technology Contexts [1.9991645269305982]
  This paper contributes a formative framework -- the Responsible and Inclusive Technology Framework -- that orients critical reflection around the social contexts of technology creation and use. We expect that the implementation of the Responsible and Inclusive Technology framework, especially in business-to-business industry settings, will serve as a catalyst for more intentional and socially-grounded practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T18:59:04Z)
• Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future Trends [76.94037394832931]
  In recent years, the CHI community has seen significant growth in research on Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence. All of this work is aimed at developing AI that benefits humanity while being grounded in human rights and ethics, and reducing the potential harms of AI. In this special interest group, we aim to bring together researchers from academia and industry interested in these topics to map current and future research trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T08:59:42Z)
• Beyond Transactional Democracy: A Study of Civic Tech in Canada [3.2814818900171763]
  Civic tech groups organize around issues of shared concern to explore new forms of democratic technologies. This paper explores how a Civic Tech Toronto creates a platform for civic engagement through the maintenance of an autonomous community. The case shows that understanding civic tech requires a lens beyond the mere analysis or production of technical artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T19:31:13Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• Deep Technology Tracing for High-tech Companies [67.86308971806322]
  We develop a novel data-driven solution, i.e., Deep Technology Forecasting (DTF) framework, to automatically find the most possible technology directions customized to each high-tech company. DTF consists of three components: Potential Competitor Recognition (PCR), Collaborative Technology Recognition (CTR), and Deep Technology Tracing (DTT) neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-02T07:44:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.