FEAT: A Multi-Agent Forensic AI System with Domain-Adapted Large Language Model for Automated Cause-of-Death Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07950v1
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:05:59 GMT
- Title: FEAT: A Multi-Agent Forensic AI System with Domain-Adapted Large Language Model for Automated Cause-of-Death Analysis
- Abstract summary: Forensic cause-of-death determination faces systemic challenges, including workforce shortages and diagnostic variability.<n>We introduce FEAT, a multi-agent AI framework that automates and standardizes death investigations through a domain-adapted large language model.<n>In evaluations across diverse Chinese case cohorts, FEAT outperformed state-of-the-art AI systems in both long-form autopsy analyses and concise cause-of-death conclusions.
- Score: 13.589362185995611
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Forensic cause-of-death determination faces systemic challenges, including workforce shortages and diagnostic variability, particularly in high-volume systems like China's medicolegal infrastructure. We introduce FEAT (ForEnsic AgenT), a multi-agent AI framework that automates and standardizes death investigations through a domain-adapted large language model. FEAT's application-oriented architecture integrates: (i) a central Planner for task decomposition, (ii) specialized Local Solvers for evidence analysis, (iii) a Memory & Reflection module for iterative refinement, and (iv) a Global Solver for conclusion synthesis. The system employs tool-augmented reasoning, hierarchical retrieval-augmented generation, forensic-tuned LLMs, and human-in-the-loop feedback to ensure legal and medical validity. In evaluations across diverse Chinese case cohorts, FEAT outperformed state-of-the-art AI systems in both long-form autopsy analyses and concise cause-of-death conclusions. It demonstrated robust generalization across six geographic regions and achieved high expert concordance in blinded validations. Senior pathologists validated FEAT's outputs as comparable to those of human experts, with improved detection of subtle evidentiary nuances. To our knowledge, FEAT is the first LLM-based AI agent system dedicated to forensic medicine, offering scalable, consistent death certification while maintaining expert-level rigor. By integrating AI efficiency with human oversight, this work could advance equitable access to reliable medicolegal services while addressing critical capacity constraints in forensic systems.
Related papers
- Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions [24.28151698249644]
Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems have emerged as promising solutions.<n>This survey systematically reviews 74 studies and makes four contributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-03T11:42:29Z) - Foundations for Agentic AI Investigations from the Forensic Analysis of OpenClaw [0.0]
Agentic Al systems are increasingly deployed as personal assistants and are likely to become a common object of digital investigations.<n>This paper presents an empirical study of OpenClaw a widely used single-agent assistant.<n>We classify and correlate these traces to assess their investigative value in a systematic way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T08:35:22Z) - AgentFoX: LLM Agent-Guided Fusion with eXplainability for AI-Generated Image Detection [21.02452809723292]
We present textbfAgentFoX, a framework that redefines AIGI detection as a dynamic, multi-phase analytical process.<n>Our approach employs a quick-integration fusion mechanism guided by a curated knowledge base.<n>AgentFoX produces a detailed, human-readable forensic report that substantiates its verdict.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T12:10:21Z) - Explainable and Fine-Grained Safeguarding of LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Bi-Level Graph Anomaly Detection [76.91230292971115]
Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown strong capabilities in solving complex tasks.<n>XG-Guard is an explainable and fine-grained safeguarding framework for detecting malicious agents in MAS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-21T13:46:36Z) - SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z) - SciAgent: A Unified Multi-Agent System for Generalistic Scientific Reasoning [54.186990494217916]
SciAgent is a unified multi-agent system designed for generalistic scientific reasoning.<n>A Coordinator Agent interprets each problem's domain and complexity, dynamically orchestrating specialized Worker Systems.<n>These Worker Systems are composed of interacting reasoning Sub-agents for symbolic deduction, conceptual modeling, numerical computation, and verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-11T12:00:34Z) - End-to-End Agentic RAG System Training for Traceable Diagnostic Reasoning [52.12425911708585]
Deep-DxSearch is an agentic RAG system trained end-to-end with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>In Deep-DxSearch, we first construct a large-scale medical retrieval corpus comprising patient records and reliable medical knowledge sources.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our end-to-end RL training framework consistently outperforms prompt-engineering and training-free RAG approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T17:42:47Z) - Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z) - A Versatile Pathology Co-pilot via Reasoning Enhanced Multimodal Large Language Model [26.704101714550827]
We present SmartPath-R1, a versatile MLLM capable of simultaneously addressing both ROI-level and WSI-level tasks.<n>Our framework combines scale-dependent supervised fine-tuning and task-aware reinforcement fine-tuning, which circumvents the requirement for chain-of-thought supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-23T08:09:42Z) - AIGI-Holmes: Towards Explainable and Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection via Multimodal Large Language Models [78.08374249341514]
The rapid development of AI-generated content (AIGC) has led to the misuse of AI-generated images (AIGI) in spreading misinformation.<n>We introduce a large-scale and comprehensive dataset, Holmes-Set, which includes an instruction-tuning dataset with explanations on whether images are AI-generated.<n>Our work introduces an efficient data annotation method called the Multi-Expert Jury, enhancing data generation through structured MLLM explanations and quality control.<n>In addition, we propose Holmes Pipeline, a meticulously designed three-stage training framework comprising visual expert pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, and direct preference optimization
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-03T14:26:31Z) - Advancing AI Research Assistants with Expert-Involved Learning [84.30323604785646]
Large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) promise to accelerate biomedical discovery, yet their reliability remains unclear.<n>We introduce ARIEL (AI Research Assistant for Expert-in-the-Loop Learning), an open-source evaluation and optimization framework.<n>We find that state-of-the-art models generate fluent but incomplete summaries, whereas LMMs struggle with detailed visual reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-03T14:21:48Z) - TAMA: A Human-AI Collaborative Thematic Analysis Framework Using Multi-Agent LLMs for Clinical Interviews [54.35097932763878]
Thematic analysis (TA) is a widely used qualitative approach for uncovering latent meanings in unstructured text data.<n>Here, we propose TAMA: A Human-AI Collaborative Thematic Analysis framework using Multi-Agent LLMs for clinical interviews.<n>We demonstrate that TAMA outperforms existing LLM-assisted TA approaches, achieving higher thematic hit rate, coverage, and distinctiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-26T15:58:16Z) - Comprehensive Review of Reinforcement Learning for Medical Ultrasound Imaging [15.38820664844588]
This work aims to offer a thorough review of current research efforts, highlighting the potential of RL in building autonomous US solutions.<n>Existing surveys on advancements in the US scanning domain predominantly focus on partially autonomous solutions leveraging AI.<n>To bridge this gap, this review proposes a comprehensive taxonomy that integrates the stages of the US process with the RL development pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T03:22:27Z) - Expertise Is What We Want [0.0]
We share an application architecture, the Large Language Expert (LLE), that combines the flexibility and power of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the interpretability, explainability, and reliability of Expert Systems.<n>To highlight the power of the Large Language Expert (LLE) system, we built an LLE to assist with the workup of patients newly diagnosed with cancer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T18:05:15Z) - Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM [51.91311158085973]
Methods for detecting AI-generated media have evolved rapidly.<n>General-purpose detectors based on MLLMs integrate authenticity verification, explainability, and localization capabilities.<n>Ethical and security considerations have emerged as critical global concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T12:18:20Z) - STRICTA: Structured Reasoning in Critical Text Assessment for Peer Review and Beyond [68.47402386668846]
We introduce Structured Reasoning In Critical Text Assessment (STRICTA) to model text assessment as an explicit, step-wise reasoning process.<n>STRICTA breaks down the assessment into a graph of interconnected reasoning steps drawing on causality theory.<n>We apply STRICTA to a dataset of over 4000 reasoning steps from roughly 40 biomedical experts on more than 20 papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T06:55:37Z) - Large-vocabulary forensic pathological analyses via prototypical cross-modal contrastive learning [20.3729821685966]
SongCi is an innovative visual-language model (VLM) designed specifically for forensic pathology.
SongCi utilizes advanced cross-modal self-supervised contrastive learning to enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and generalizability of forensic analyses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-20T15:34:52Z) - A Survey on Failure Analysis and Fault Injection in AI Systems [28.30817443151044]
The complexity of AI systems has exposed their vulnerabilities, necessitating robust methods for failure analysis (FA) and fault injection (FI) to ensure resilience and reliability.
This study fills this gap by presenting a detailed survey of existing FA and FI approaches across six layers of AI systems.
Our findings reveal a taxonomy of AI system failures, assess the capabilities of existing FI tools, and highlight discrepancies between real-world and simulated failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T00:32:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.