Exit Stories: Using Reddit Self-Disclosures to Understand Disengagement from Problematic Communities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13837v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:57:55 GMT
• Title: Exit Stories: Using Reddit Self-Disclosures to Understand Disengagement from Problematic Communities
• Authors: Shruti Phadke,
• Abstract summary: "Ex-" subreddits on Reddit allow users to recount their departures from social, ideological, and political groups.<n>This paper presents an in-depth exploration of 15K exit stories across 131 subreddits.<n>It focuses on five key areas: religion, manosphere, conspiracy theories, politics, and lifestyle.
• Score: 1.6317061277457001
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Online platforms like Reddit are increasingly becoming popular for individuals sharing personal experiences of leaving behind social, ideological, and political groups. Specifically, a series of "ex-" subreddits on Reddit allow users to recount their departures from commitments such as religious affiliations, manosphere communities, conspiracy theories or political beliefs, and lifestyle choices. Understanding the natural process through which users exit, especially from problematic groups such as conspiracy theory communities and the manosphere, can provide valuable insights for designing interventions targeting disengagement from harmful ideologies. This paper presents an in-depth exploration of 15K exit stories across 131 subreddits, focusing on five key areas: religion, manosphere, conspiracy theories, politics, and lifestyle. Using a transdisciplinary framework that incorporates theories from social psychology, organizational behavior, and violent extremism studies, this work identifies a range of factors contributing to disengagement. The results describe how disengagement from problematic groups, such as conspiracy theories and the manosphere, is a multi-faceted process that is qualitatively different than disengaging from more established social structures, such as religions or political ideologies. This research further highlights the need for moving beyond interventions that treat conspiracy theorizing solely as an information problem and contributes insights for future research focusing on offering mental health interventions and support in exit communities.

Related papers

• Beyond the Rabbit Hole: Mapping the Relational Harms of QAnon Radicalization [10.43639199148568]
  This study systematically maps radicalization journeys and quantifying the associated emotional toll inflicted on loved ones.<n>We use the prominent case of QAnon as a case study, analyzing 12747 narratives from the r/QAnonCasualties support community.<n>Our findings reveal that these personas are not just descriptive; they are powerful predictors of the specific emotional harms experienced by narrators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T02:35:22Z)
• Early linguistic fingerprints of online users who engage with conspiracy communities [3.816108682565106]
  We study the psycholinguistic patterns of Reddit users who become active in a prominent conspiracy community.<n>We find that conspiracy-engaged individuals exhibit distinct psycholinguistic fingerprints, setting them apart from the general user population.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:33:40Z)
• Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media [124.26693978503339]
  Social media platforms have traditionally relied on independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.<n>X (formerly Twitter) and Meta have shifted towards community-driven content moderation by launching their own versions of crowd-sourced fact-checking.<n>We examine the current approaches to misinformation detection across major platforms, explore the emerging role of community-driven moderation, and critically evaluate both the promises and challenges of crowd-checking at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:50:18Z)
• Dynamics of collective minds in online communities [1.747623282473278]
  We show how collective minds in online news communities can be influenced by different editorial agenda-setting practices and aspects of community dynamics.<n>We develop a computational model of collective minds, calibrated and validated with data from 400 million comments across five U.S. online news platforms and a large-scale survey.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T22:22:40Z)
• Echo-chambers and Idea Labs: Communication Styles on Twitter [51.13560635563004]
  This paper investigates the communication styles and structures of Twitter (X) communities within the vaccination context. By shedding light on the nuanced nature of communication within social networks, this study emphasizes the significance of understanding the diversity of perspectives within online communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T13:55:51Z)
• Online posting effects: Unveiling the non-linear journeys of users in depression communities on Reddit [0.12564343689544843]
  We introduce a data-informed framework reconstructing online dynamics from 303k users interacting over two years.<n>Our analysis unveils online posting effects: a user can transition to another psychological state after online exposure to peers' emotional/semantic content.<n>Interpreted in light of psychological literature, our findings can provide evidence that the type and layout of online social interactions have an impact on users' "journeys" when posting about depression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T14:45:11Z)
• Disinformation Echo-Chambers on Facebook [0.27195102129095]
  This chapter introduces a computational method designed to identify coordinated inauthentic behavior within Facebook groups. The method focuses on analyzing posts, URLs, and images, revealing that certain Facebook groups engage in orchestrated campaigns. These groups simultaneously share identical content, which may expose users to repeated encounters with false or misleading narratives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T14:33:16Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
  We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)
• Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
  We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past. We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers. These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z)
• How do climate change skeptics engage with opposing views? Understanding mechanisms of social identity and cognitive dissonance in an online forum [0.0]
  We study the impact of opposing views within a major climate change skeptic online community on Reddit. We find that ideologically dissonant submissions act as a stimulant to activity in the community. Users who engaged with dissonant submissions were also more likely to return to the forum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T13:39:00Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.